Best local LLMs for the NVIDIA GB10 (128 GB)
Each list assumes the context that task needs, so a model that fits for chat may rank lower for long documents.
General chat at 8K context
- 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 100/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Kolibri 1 (78B-A3.5B)
- 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 98/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Thinking
- 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 97/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. gpt-oss 120B
- 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 97/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3 Next 80B-A3B Instruct
- 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 97/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Ornith 1.5 122B-A10B
Coding at 32K context
- 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 100/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Kolibri 1 (78B-A3.5B)
- 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 98/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3 Coder Next (80B-A3B)
- 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 98/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Thinking
- 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 97/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Ornith 1.5 122B-A10B
- 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 97/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
Reasoning at 32K context
- 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 100/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Kolibri 1 (78B-A3.5B)
- 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 98/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Thinking
- 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 97/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Ornith 1.5 122B-A10B
- 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 97/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
- 89Excellent quality (A+) · 89 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 97/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B-A12B
Documents (RAG) at 32K context
- 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 100/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Kolibri 1 (78B-A3.5B)
- 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 98/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3 Coder Next (80B-A3B)
- 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 98/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Thinking
- 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 97/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. gpt-oss 120B
- 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 97/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3 Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Agents & tools at 64K context
- 91Excellent quality (A+) · 91 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 100/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Kolibri 1 (78B-A3.5B)
- 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 98/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3 Coder Next (80B-A3B)
- 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 97/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3 Next 80B-A3B Instruct
- 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 97/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Ornith 1.5 122B-A10B
- 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 97/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
Reverse engineering at 32K context
- 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 97/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. gpt-oss 120B
- 93Excellent quality (A+) · 93 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 96/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B
- 91Excellent quality (A+) · 91 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 95/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Kolibri 1 (78B-A3.5B)
- 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3 Coder Next (80B-A3B)
- 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Thinking
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.