Best local LLMs for the OnePlus 13 (24 GB RAM)

Each list assumes the context that task needs, so a model that fits for chat may rank lower for long documents.

General chat at 8K context

  1. 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Gemma 4 26B-A4B Q3_K_M · 24.2 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  2. 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. LFM2.5 24B-A2B Q4_K_M · 28.4 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  3. 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Raon-1 mini Preview (30B-A4B) Q3_K_M · 21.6 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  4. 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3.6 35B-A3B Q2_K · 37.3 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  5. 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B Q2_K · 37.3 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)

Coding at 32K context

  1. 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Gemma 4 26B-A4B Q3_K_M · 24.2 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  2. 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Maple Preview (20B-A1B) Q5_K_M · 37.2 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  3. 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Raon-1 mini Preview (30B-A4B) Q3_K_M · 21.6 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  4. 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B Q2_K · 37.3 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  5. 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Nex N2 Mini (35B-A3B) Q2_K · 37.3 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)

Reasoning at 32K context

  1. 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Maple Preview (20B-A1B) Q5_K_M · 37.2 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  2. 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Raon-1 mini Preview (30B-A4B) Q3_K_M · 21.6 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  3. 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B Q2_K · 37.3 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  4. 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Nex N2 Mini (35B-A3B) Q2_K · 37.3 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  5. 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. LFM2.5 24B-A2B Q3_K_M · 35.9 tok/s · Runs great

Documents (RAG) at 32K context

  1. 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Gemma 4 26B-A4B Q3_K_M · 24.2 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  2. 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B Q2_K · 37.3 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  3. 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GLM-4.7 Flash (30B-A3B) Q2_K · 37.3 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  4. 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Agents-A1 35B-A3B Q2_K · 37.3 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  5. 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen AgentWorld 35B-A3B Q2_K · 37.3 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)

Agents & tools at 64K context

  1. 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Raon-1 mini Preview (30B-A4B) Q3_K_M · 21.6 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  2. 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. gpt-oss 20B MXFP4 · 21.3 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  3. 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. LFM2.5 24B-A2B Q3_K_M · 35.9 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  4. 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Gemma 4 26B-A4B Q2_K · 30.2 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  5. 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Mellum2.1 Thinking (12B-A2.5B) Q4_K_M · 27.9 tok/s · Runs well

Reverse engineering at 32K context

  1. 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. gpt-oss 20B MXFP4 · 21.3 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  2. 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GLM-4.7 Flash (30B-A3B) Q2_K · 37.3 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  3. 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Gemma 4 26B-A4B Q3_K_M · 24.2 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  4. 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Maple Preview (20B-A1B) Q5_K_M · 37.2 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  5. 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Raon-1 mini Preview (30B-A4B) Q3_K_M · 21.6 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.

Was this page helpful?