AuraFlow v0.3 on Intel Celeron N5105 / N5095 NAS (16 GB)

Can the Intel Celeron N5105 / N5095 NAS (16 GB) run AuraFlow v0.3?

Barely: it runs very slowly

Very slow. At Q4 GGUF it needs about 7.7 GB of 12.0 GB usable and takes about 1.9 h per image.

Best precision: Q4 GGUF
Memory mode: Everything on GPU
Time per image: 1.9 h
Output: 1024×1024, 50 steps

Download AuraFlow v0.3

Recommended for the Intel Celeron N5105 / N5095 NAS (16 GB): q4_gguf. Every other precision has its own download link in the table below.

Quantized files · GGUF for ComfyUI

Smaller GGUF versions for ComfyUI (with the ComfyUI-GGUF node). No sign-in needed; the model’s license still applies.

Download the q4_gguf (Q4_K_S) file (opens in a new tab)

huggingface.co/city96/AuraFlow-v0.3-gguf (opens in a new tab)

Original weights · Hugging Face

Full-precision files from fal, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers, Diffusers or ComfyUI.

huggingface.co/fal/AuraFlow-v0.3 (opens in a new tab)

No sign-in needed.

Links checked 3 days ago against Hugging Face, Ollama and GitHub.

How it’s rated

Quality 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.: How capable the model itself is at Q4 GGUF, from its editorial quality tier scaled by the quantization or precision. It’s the same on any hardware that runs this variant. Scale: A+ 85+ · A 70+ · B 55+ · C 40+ · D under 40.
Runs Very slow: How well it runs on the Intel Celeron N5105 / N5095 NAS (16 GB): speed, capped by how well it fits in memory. Runs great: 30+ tokens/s (or near the image, video or decision speed target) · Runs well: 10+ tokens/s · Slow: 3+ tokens/s · Very slow: under 3 · Won’t run: doesn’t fit even with offload. A tight fit or RAM offload caps it at Runs well; heavy offload caps it at Slow.

Match score

To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.

Model qualityEditorial quality tier of the model, scaled by the quantization or precision used.	24.3 / 45
Memory fitFull marks when the model fits in the share of the NAS’s memory that models can use (the rest stays with the NAS system and its storage services); fewer when it goes past that limit.	25.0 / 25
SpeedGeneration speed against a 40 tokens/s target for LLMs, or render time against a target for image and video.	0.6 / 15
Memory useRewards using the memory you have, so a bigger, better variant beats a tiny one that leaves most memory idle.	14.8 / 15
Match score	64.7 / 100

The match score orders results; it is not shown as a grade. Quality and Runs are the two ratings in the tables.

Every precision on the Intel Celeron N5105 / N5095 NAS (16 GB)

Quant	Memory needed	Available	Speed	Memory mode	Runs	Quality	Download
`FP16`	7.0 GB	12.0 GB	2.1 h	Sequential CPU offload	Very slowCPU offload	58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	Original weights (opens in a new tab)
`FP8`	10.4 GB	12.0 GB	85.4 min	Everything on GPU	Very slowtight fit	56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	Original weights (opens in a new tab)
`Q8 GGUF`	10.9 GB	12.0 GB	1.8 h	Everything on GPU	Very slowtight fit	57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`Q4 GGUF`	7.7 GB	12.0 GB	1.9 h	Everything on GPU	Very slow	53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)

Other hardware that runs it

56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT FP8 · 17 s · Runs well
56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 FP8 · 17 s · Runs well
56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER FP8 · 18 s · Runs well
56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER FP8 · 20 s · Runs well
56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti FP8 · 20 s · Runs well
58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 FP16 · 26 s · Runs well

Quick answers

How much memory does AuraFlow v0.3 need on the Intel Celeron N5105 / N5095 NAS 16GB?

At Q4 GGUF it needs about 7.7 GB. The Intel Celeron N5105 / N5095 NAS 16GB has 12.0 GB usable.

How long does AuraFlow v0.3 take on the Intel Celeron N5105 / N5095 NAS 16GB?

About 1.9 h per image at Q4 GGUF and default settings, an estimate scaled from a reference timing by this hardware’s compute speed.

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.