DeepSeek Coder V2 Lite (16B) on Apple M1 Pro (16 GB)
Can the Apple M1 Pro (16 GB) run DeepSeek Coder V2 Lite (16B)?
Yes, it runs well (tight fit)
Runs well (tight fit). At Q3_K_M it needs about 9.4 GB of 10.7 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 83.2 tok/s.
- Best quant
Q3_K_M- Generation speed
- 83.2 tok/s
- Prompt processing
- 1,343 tok/s
- First token (1K prompt)
- 0.8 s
- Largest safe context
- 49K
Best app to run it on the Apple M1 Pro (16 GB)
On macOS
- Runs the MLX build, typically 35–90% faster than GGUF for a model with 2.4B active parameters on Apple silicon.
- Point-and-click: search, download and chat in one window.
Download DeepSeek Coder V2 Lite (16B)
Recommended for the Apple M1 Pro (16 GB): Q3_K_M. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.
Quickest · Ollama
One command downloads a ready-to-run version and starts a chat.
ollama run deepseek-coder-v2:16b-lite-instruct-q3_K_MQuantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
Download the Q3_K_M (Q3_K_L) file (opens in a new tab)
huggingface.co/lmstudio-community/DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite-Instruct-GGUF (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/lmstudio-community/DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite-Instruct-GGUF:Q3_K_LOriginal weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from DeepSeek, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite-Instruct (opens in a new tab)
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from DeepSeek. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder-V2 (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder-V2How it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 19.7 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 24.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Match score | 73.7 / 100 |
Every quantization on the Apple M1 Pro (16 GB)
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 8.0 GB | 10.7 GB | 99.6 tok/s | Runs great | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | |
Q3_K_M | 9.4 GB | 10.7 GB | 83.2 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (Q3_K_L) (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 11.3 GB | 10.7 GB | 57.8 tok/s | Runs wellover GPU memory limit | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 12.9 GB | 10.7 GB | 49.3 tok/s | Slowfar over GPU memory limit | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 14.6 GB | 10.7 GB | — | Won't run | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 18.4 GB | 10.7 GB | — | Won't run | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 33.1 GB | 10.7 GB | — | Won't run | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Other hardware that runs it
-
52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
-
52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Max (64 GB)
-
52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
-
52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
-
50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT
-
50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Pro (24 GB)
Quick answers
How much memory does DeepSeek Coder V2 Lite (16B) need on the M1 Pro 16GB?
At Q3_K_M it needs about 9.4 GB. The M1 Pro 16GB has 10.7 GB usable.
How fast is DeepSeek Coder V2 Lite (16B) on the M1 Pro 16GB?
About 83.2 tok/s at Q3_K_M, an estimate from the hardware’s memory bandwidth and the size of the model.
Which quantization of DeepSeek Coder V2 Lite (16B) should I use on the M1 Pro 16GB?
Q3_K_M. Of the versions that fit, it is the one that runs best; when two run equally well, the check prefers the higher-rated one.
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.