Gemma 4 12B on Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) (32 GB)
Can the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) (32 GB) run Gemma 4 12B?
Yes, it runs well
Runs well. At Q3_K_M it needs about 8.6 GB of 18.2 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 10.4 tok/s.
- Best quant
Q3_K_M- Generation speed
- 10.4 tok/s
- Prompt processing
- 423 tok/s
- First token (1K prompt)
- 2.4 s
- Largest safe context
- 123K
Best app to run it on the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) (32 GB)
On Windows
- Supports Intel Arc through SYCL and Vulkan.
- Usually the first to support new model architectures.
llama-server -hf unsloth/gemma-4-12B-it-GGUF:Q3_K_MOn Linux
- Supports Intel Arc through SYCL and Vulkan.
- Usually the first to support new model architectures.
llama-server -hf unsloth/gemma-4-12B-it-GGUF:Q3_K_MDownload Gemma 4 12B
Recommended for the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) (32 GB): Q3_K_M. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.
Quickest · Ollama
One command downloads a ready-to-run version and starts a chat.
ollama run gemma4:12bQuantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
Download the Q3_K_M file (opens in a new tab)
huggingface.co/unsloth/gemma-4-12B-it-GGUF (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/unsloth/gemma-4-12B-it-GGUF:Q3_K_MOriginal weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from Google, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Google. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/google-deepmind/gemma (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/google-deepmind/gemmaHow it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 31.4 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 25.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 7.6 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 10.9 / 15 | |
| Match score | 74.9 / 100 |
Every quantization on the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) (32 GB)
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 7.5 GB | 18.2 GB | 13.2 tok/s | Runs well | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (UD-Q2_K_XL) (opens in a new tab) |
Q3_K_M | 8.6 GB | 18.2 GB | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 10.0 GB | 18.2 GB | 8.0 tok/s | Slow | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 11.2 GB | 18.2 GB | 6.6 tok/s | Slow | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 12.5 GB | 18.2 GB | 5.6 tok/s | Slow | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 15.4 GB | 18.2 GB | 4.1 tok/s | Slow | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 26.7 GB | 18.2 GB | — | Won't run | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Other hardware that runs it
-
83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 92/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
-
82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
-
82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
-
82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
-
82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080
-
83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Quick answers
How much memory does Gemma 4 12B need on the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) 32GB?
At Q3_K_M it needs about 8.6 GB. The Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) 32GB has 18.2 GB usable.
How fast is Gemma 4 12B on the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) 32GB?
About 10.4 tok/s at Q3_K_M, an estimate from the hardware’s memory bandwidth and the size of the model.
Which quantization of Gemma 4 12B should I use on the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) 32GB?
Q3_K_M. Of the versions that fit, it is the one that runs best; when two run equally well, the check prefers the higher-rated one.
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.