Gemma 4 26B-A4B on Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) (32 GB)
Can the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) (32 GB) run Gemma 4 26B-A4B?
Yes, it runs well (tight fit)
Runs well (tight fit). At Q4_K_M it needs about 18.2 GB of 18.2 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 23.3 tok/s.
- Best quant
Q4_K_M- Generation speed
- 23.3 tok/s
- Prompt processing
- 1,332 tok/s
- First token (1K prompt)
- 0.8 s
- Largest safe context
- 8K
Best app to run it on the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) (32 GB)
On Windows
- Supports Intel Arc through SYCL and Vulkan.
- Usually the first to support new model architectures.
llama-server -hf unsloth/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-GGUF:Q4_K_MOn Linux
- Supports Intel Arc through SYCL and Vulkan.
- Usually the first to support new model architectures.
llama-server -hf unsloth/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-GGUF:Q4_K_MDownload Gemma 4 26B-A4B
Recommended for the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) (32 GB): Q4_K_M. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.
Quickest · Ollama
One command downloads a ready-to-run version and starts a chat.
ollama run gemma4:26b-a4b-it-q4_K_MQuantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
Download the Q4_K_M file (opens in a new tab)
huggingface.co/unsloth/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-GGUF (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/unsloth/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-GGUF:Q4_K_MOriginal weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from Google, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
huggingface.co/google/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it (opens in a new tab)
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Google. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/google-deepmind/gemma (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/google-deepmind/gemmaHow it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 39.5 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 24.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 11.4 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Match score | 90.0 / 100 |
Every quantization on the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) (32 GB)
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 12.8 GB | 18.2 GB | 36.7 tok/s | Runs great | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (UD-Q2_K_XL) (opens in a new tab) |
Q3_K_M | 15.1 GB | 18.2 GB | 29.5 tok/s | Runs well | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 18.2 GB | 18.2 GB | 23.3 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 20.8 GB | 18.2 GB | 16.5 tok/s | Slowfar over GPU memory limit | 89Excellent quality (A+) · 89 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 23.6 GB | 18.2 GB | — | Won't run | 91Excellent quality (A+) · 91 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 29.8 GB | 18.2 GB | — | Won't run | 92Excellent quality (A+) · 92 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 54.1 GB | 18.2 GB | — | Won't run | 92Excellent quality (A+) · 92 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Other hardware that runs it
-
92Excellent quality (A+) · 92 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 96/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M1 Max (64 GB)
-
92Excellent quality (A+) · 92 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 96/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Max (64 GB)
-
91Excellent quality (A+) · 91 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 96/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Pro (48 GB)
-
91Excellent quality (A+) · 91 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 96/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
-
92Excellent quality (A+) · 92 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 95/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
-
91Excellent quality (A+) · 91 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 95/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Quick answers
How much memory does Gemma 4 26B-A4B need on the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) 32GB?
At Q4_K_M it needs about 18.2 GB. The Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) 32GB has 18.2 GB usable.
How fast is Gemma 4 26B-A4B on the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) 32GB?
About 23.3 tok/s at Q4_K_M, an estimate from the hardware’s memory bandwidth and the size of the model.
Which quantization of Gemma 4 26B-A4B should I use on the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) 32GB?
Q4_K_M. Of the versions that fit, it is the one that runs best; when two run equally well, the check prefers the higher-rated one.
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.