GLM-Z1 32B (0414) on Intel Core Ultra 7 255H / 9 285H NAS (32 GB)

Can the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H / 9 285H NAS (32 GB) run GLM-Z1 32B (0414)?

Yes, but slowly (tight fit)

Slow (tight fit). At Q2_K it needs about 15.6 GB of 18.2 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 6.2 tok/s.

Best quant: Q2_K
Generation speed: 6.2 tok/s
Prompt processing: 198 tok/s
First token (1K prompt): 5.2 s
Largest safe context: 32K

Best app to run it on the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H / 9 285H NAS (32 GB)

On Linux

llama.cpp

Command line + local API · runs on llama.cpp

Usually the first to support new model architectures.

llama-server -hf unsloth/GLM-Z1-32B-0414-GGUF:Q2_K

Ollama Runs the Hugging Face GGUF with ollama run hf.co/…
KoboldCpp

Want an agent? GLM-Z1 32B (0414) supports tool use, so you can pair a llama.cpp or MLX LM server with one of these. Apps that run on this computer come first.

Coding agents

Personal assistants

How we choose: the files published for this model, which apps run in a container on a NAS without a graphics card (models run on its processor), and whether the model fits fully in the memory models can use. Details.

Download GLM-Z1 32B (0414)

Recommended for the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H / 9 285H NAS (32 GB): Q2_K. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.

Quantized files · GGUF

Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.

Download the Q2_K file (opens in a new tab)

huggingface.co/unsloth/GLM-Z1-32B-0414-GGUF (opens in a new tab)

ollama run hf.co/unsloth/GLM-Z1-32B-0414-GGUF:Q2_K

Original weights · Hugging Face

Full-precision files from Zhipu AI, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.

huggingface.co/zai-org/GLM-Z1-32B-0414 (opens in a new tab)

No sign-in needed.

Links checked 3 days ago against Hugging Face, Ollama and GitHub.

How it’s rated

Quality 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.: How capable the model itself is at Q2_K, from its editorial quality tier scaled by the quantization or precision. It’s the same on any hardware that runs this variant. Scale: A+ 85+ · A 70+ · B 55+ · C 40+ · D under 40.
Runs Slowtight fit: How well it runs on the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H / 9 285H NAS (32 GB): speed, capped by how well it fits in memory. Runs great: 30+ tokens/s (or near the image, video or decision speed target) · Runs well: 10+ tokens/s · Slow: 3+ tokens/s · Very slow: under 3 · Won’t run: doesn’t fit even with offload. A tight fit or RAM offload caps it at Runs well; heavy offload caps it at Slow.

Match score

To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.

Model qualityEditorial quality tier of the model, scaled by the quantization or precision used.	23.3 / 45
Memory fitFull marks when the model fits in the share of the NAS’s memory that models can use (the rest stays with the NAS system and its storage services); fewer when it goes past that limit.	24.0 / 25
SpeedGeneration speed against a 40 tokens/s target for LLMs, or render time against a target for image and video.	5.9 / 15
Memory useRewards using the memory you have, so a bigger, better variant beats a tiny one that leaves most memory idle.	15.0 / 15
Match score	68.2 / 100

The match score orders results; it is not shown as a grade. Quality and Runs are the two ratings in the tables.

Every quantization on the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H / 9 285H NAS (32 GB)

Quant	Memory needed	Available	Speed	Runs	Quality	Download
`Q2_K`	15.6 GB	18.2 GB	6.2 tok/s	Slowtight fit	51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`Q3_K_M`	18.5 GB	18.2 GB	4.1 tok/s	Slowover GPU memory limit	62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`Q4_K_M`	22.4 GB	18.2 GB	3.2 tok/s	Slowfar over GPU memory limit	70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`Q5_K_M`	25.7 GB	18.2 GB	—	Won't run	71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`Q6_K`	29.3 GB	18.2 GB	—	Won't run	73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`Q8_0`	37.1 GB	18.2 GB	—	Won't run	74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`F16`	67.7 GB	18.2 GB	—	Won't run	74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab)

Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.

Other hardware that runs it

71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Q5_K_M · 55.8 tok/s · Runs great
70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Q4_K_M · 38.0 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Q4_K_M · 35.3 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX Q4_K_M · 31.2 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Q6_K · 46.9 tok/s · Runs great
70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Apple M4 Max (64 GB) Q4_K_M · 17.7 tok/s · Runs well

Quick answers

How much memory does GLM-Z1 32B (0414) need on the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H / 9 285H NAS 32GB?

At Q2_K it needs about 15.6 GB. The Intel Core Ultra 7 255H / 9 285H NAS 32GB has 18.2 GB usable.

How fast is GLM-Z1 32B (0414) on the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H / 9 285H NAS 32GB?

About 6.2 tok/s at Q2_K, an estimate from the hardware’s memory bandwidth and the size of the model.

Which quantization of GLM-Z1 32B (0414) should I use on the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H / 9 285H NAS 32GB?

Q2_K. Of the versions that fit, it is the one that runs best; when two run equally well, the check prefers the higher-rated one.

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.