Hermes 4 70B on AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (DDR5 SO-DIMM) (96 GB)

Can the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (DDR5 SO-DIMM) (96 GB) run Hermes 4 70B?

Barely: it runs very slowly

Very slow. At Q5_K_M it needs about 59.1 GB of 72.0 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 1.1 tok/s.

Best quant: Q5_K_M
Generation speed: 1.1 tok/s
Prompt processing: 209 tok/s
First token (1K prompt): 4.9 s
Largest safe context: 46K

Best app to run it on the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (DDR5 SO-DIMM) (96 GB)

On Windows

Lemonade

Desktop app · runs on llama.cpp, ONNX Runtime GenAI (Ryzen AI NPU)

Built for Ryzen AI and Strix Halo, including NPU + iGPU modes on Windows.

lemonade pull unsloth/Hermes-4-70B-GGUF:Q5_K_M

LM Studio Point-and-click: search, download and chat in one window.
llama.cpp Usually the first to support new model architectures.

On Linux

Lemonade

Desktop app · runs on llama.cpp, ONNX Runtime GenAI (Ryzen AI NPU)

Built for Ryzen AI and Strix Halo, including NPU + iGPU modes on Windows.

lemonade pull unsloth/Hermes-4-70B-GGUF:Q5_K_M

LM Studio Point-and-click: search, download and chat in one window.
llama.cpp Usually the first to support new model architectures.

Want an agent? Hermes 4 70B supports tool use, so you can pair a llama.cpp or MLX LM server with one of these. Apps that run on this computer come first.

Coding agents

Personal assistants

How we choose: the files published for this model, your operating system and GPU, whether it fits fully in memory, and published speed tests (MLX vs llama.cpp on Apple silicon, vLLM vs llama.cpp vs Ollama on NVIDIA). Details.

Download Hermes 4 70B

Recommended for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (DDR5 SO-DIMM) (96 GB): Q5_K_M. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.

Quantized files · GGUF

Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.

Download the Q5_K_M file (opens in a new tab)

huggingface.co/unsloth/Hermes-4-70B-GGUF (opens in a new tab)

ollama run hf.co/unsloth/Hermes-4-70B-GGUF:Q5_K_M

Original weights · Hugging Face

Full-precision files from Nous Research, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.

huggingface.co/NousResearch/Hermes-4-70B (opens in a new tab)

No sign-in needed.

Links checked 3 days ago against Hugging Face, Ollama and GitHub.

How it’s rated

Quality 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.: How capable the model itself is at Q5_K_M, from its editorial quality tier scaled by the quantization or precision. It’s the same on any hardware that runs this variant. Scale: A+ 85+ · A 70+ · B 55+ · C 40+ · D under 40.
Runs Very slow: How well it runs on the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (DDR5 SO-DIMM) (96 GB): speed, capped by how well it fits in memory. Runs great: 30+ tokens/s (or near the image, video or decision speed target) · Runs well: 10+ tokens/s · Slow: 3+ tokens/s · Very slow: under 3 · Won’t run: doesn’t fit even with offload. A tight fit or RAM offload caps it at Runs well; heavy offload caps it at Slow.

Match score

To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.

Model qualityEditorial quality tier of the model, scaled by the quantization or precision used.	32.3 / 45
Memory fitFull marks when the model fits in the share of unified memory the GPU can use; fewer when it goes past that limit.	25.0 / 25
SpeedGeneration speed against a 40 tokens/s target for LLMs, or render time against a target for image and video.	2.5 / 15
Memory useRewards using the memory you have, so a bigger, better variant beats a tiny one that leaves most memory idle.	15.0 / 15
Match score	74.8 / 100

The match score orders results; it is not shown as a grade. Quality and Runs are the two ratings in the tables.

Every quantization on the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (DDR5 SO-DIMM) (96 GB)

Quant	Memory needed	Available	Speed	Runs	Quality	Download
`Q2_K`	37.3 GB	72.0 GB	2.2 tok/s	Very slow	51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`Q3_K_M`	43.6 GB	72.0 GB	1.7 tok/s	Very slow	62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`Q4_K_M`	52.1 GB	72.0 GB	1.3 tok/s	Very slow	70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`Q5_K_M`	59.1 GB	72.0 GB	1.1 tok/s	Very slow	71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`Q6_K`	66.9 GB	72.0 GB	0.9 tok/s	Very slowtight fit	73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab)
`Q8_0`	83.8 GB	72.0 GB	0.6 tok/s	Very slowfar over GPU memory limit	74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab)
`F16`	150 GB	72.0 GB	—	Won't run	74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab)

Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.

Other hardware that runs it

70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Q4_K_M · 31.2 tok/s · Runs great
62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Apple M4 Max (64 GB) Q3_K_M · 10.6 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Apple M2 Ultra (192 GB) Q4_K_M · 12.0 tok/s · Runs well
70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Apple M3 Ultra (256 GB) Q4_K_M · 12.3 tok/s · Runs well
62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Apple M4 Max (128 GB) Q3_K_M · 10.6 tok/s · Runs well
70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Apple M3 Ultra (512 GB) Q4_K_M · 12.3 tok/s · Runs well

Quick answers

How much memory does Hermes 4 70B need on the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (DDR5 SO-DIMM) 96GB?

At Q5_K_M it needs about 59.1 GB. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (DDR5 SO-DIMM) 96GB has 72.0 GB usable.

How fast is Hermes 4 70B on the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (DDR5 SO-DIMM) 96GB?

About 1.1 tok/s at Q5_K_M, an estimate from the hardware’s memory bandwidth and the size of the model.

Which quantization of Hermes 4 70B should I use on the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (DDR5 SO-DIMM) 96GB?

Q5_K_M. Of the versions that fit, it is the one that runs best; when two run equally well, the check prefers the higher-rated one.

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.