on

Can the Apple M5 Max (36 GB) run InternLM2 Chat 20B?

39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.

Yes, it runs well

Runs well. At Q4_K_M it needs about 16.3 GB of 24.1 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 24.5 tok/s.

Best quant
Q4_K_M
Generation speed
24.5 tok/s
Prompt processing
471 tok/s
First token (1K prompt)
2.2 s
Largest safe context
32K

Best app to run it on the Apple M5 Max (36 GB)

On macOS

LM Studio

Desktop app · runs on llama.cpp, MLX

  • Point-and-click: search, download and chat in one window.

Open InternLM2 Chat 20B in LM Studio

  • llama.cpp Usually the first to support new model architectures.
  • Ollama Runs the Hugging Face GGUF with ollama run hf.co/…

How we choose: the files published for this model, your operating system and GPU, whether it fits fully in memory, and published speed tests (MLX vs llama.cpp on Apple silicon, vLLM vs llama.cpp vs Ollama on NVIDIA). Details.

Download InternLM2 Chat 20B

Recommended for the Apple M5 Max (36 GB): Q4_K_M. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.

Quantized files · GGUF

Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.

Download the Q4_K_M file (opens in a new tab)

huggingface.co/mradermacher/internlm2-chat-20b-i1-GGUF (opens in a new tab)

ollama run hf.co/mradermacher/internlm2-chat-20b-i1-GGUF:Q4_K_M

Original weights · Hugging Face

Full-precision files from Shanghai AI Lab, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.

huggingface.co/internlm/internlm2-chat-20b (opens in a new tab)

No sign-in needed.

How it’s rated

Quality 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
How capable the model itself is at Q4_K_M, from its editorial quality tier scaled by the quantization or precision. It’s the same on any hardware that runs this variant. Scale: A+ 85+ · A 70+ · B 55+ · C 40+ · D under 40.
Runs Runs well
How well it runs on the Apple M5 Max (36 GB): speed, capped by how well it fits in memory. Runs great: 30+ tokens/s (or near the image, video or decision speed target) · Runs well: 10+ tokens/s · Slow: 3+ tokens/s · Very slow: under 3 · Won’t run: doesn’t fit even with offload. A tight fit or RAM offload caps it at Runs well; heavy offload caps it at Slow.

Match score

To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.

Model qualityEditorial quality tier of the model, scaled by the quantization or precision used.18.0 / 45
Memory fitFull marks when the model fits in the share of unified memory the GPU can use; fewer when it goes past that limit.25.0 / 25
SpeedGeneration speed against a 40 tokens/s target for LLMs, or render time against a target for image and video.11.7 / 15
Memory useRewards using the memory you have, so a bigger, better variant beats a tiny one that leaves most memory idle.15.0 / 15
Match score69.7 / 100

The match score orders results; it is not shown as a grade. Quality and Runs are the two ratings in the tables.

Every quantization on the Apple M5 Max (36 GB)

Quant Memory needed Available Speed Runs Quality Download
Q2_K 12.1 GB 24.1 GB 40.2 tok/s Runs great 29Basic quality (D) · 29 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GGUF (opens in a new tab)
Q3_K_M 13.9 GB 24.1 GB 31.7 tok/s Runs great 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GGUF (opens in a new tab)
Q4_K_M 16.3 GB 24.1 GB 24.5 tok/s Runs well 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GGUF (opens in a new tab)
Q5_K_M 18.2 GB 24.1 GB 20.2 tok/s Runs well 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GGUF (opens in a new tab)
Q6_K 20.4 GB 24.1 GB 17.0 tok/s Runs well 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GGUF (opens in a new tab)
Q8_0 25.2 GB 24.1 GB 10.6 tok/s Runs wellover GPU memory limit 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GGUF files (opens in a new tab)
F16 43.9 GB 24.1 GB — Won't run 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 5/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Original weights (opens in a new tab)

Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.

Other hardware that runs it

Quick answers

How much memory does InternLM2 Chat 20B need on the M5 Max 36GB?

At Q4_K_M it needs about 16.3 GB. The M5 Max 36GB has 24.1 GB usable.

How fast is InternLM2 Chat 20B on the M5 Max 36GB?

About 24.5 tok/s at Q4_K_M, an estimate from the hardware’s memory bandwidth and the size of the model.

Which quantization of InternLM2 Chat 20B should I use on the M5 Max 36GB?

Q4_K_M. Of the versions that fit, it is the one that runs best; when two run equally well, the check prefers the higher-rated one.

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.

Was this page helpful?