on

Can the Intel Core i5-1240P / i5-1340P NAS (96 GB) run Kimi Dev 72B?

79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.

Barely: it runs very slowly

Very slow. At Q6_K it needs about 69.6 GB of 83.5 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 0.4 tok/s.

Best quant
Q6_K
Generation speed
0.4 tok/s
Prompt processing
4.3 tok/s
First token (1K prompt)
236.4 s
Largest safe context
49K

Best app to run it on the Intel Core i5-1240P / i5-1340P NAS (96 GB)

On Linux

llama.cpp

Command line + local API · runs on llama.cpp

  • Usually the first to support new model architectures.
llama-server -hf unsloth/Kimi-Dev-72B-GGUF:Q6_K

Want an agent? Kimi Dev 72B supports tool use, so you can pair a llama.cpp or MLX LM server with one of these. Apps that run on this computer come first.

Coding agents

Personal assistants

How we choose: the files published for this model, which apps run in a container on a NAS without a graphics card (models run on its processor), and whether the model fits fully in the memory models can use. Details.

Download Kimi Dev 72B

Recommended for the Intel Core i5-1240P / i5-1340P NAS (96 GB): Q6_K. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.

Quantized files · GGUF

Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.

Download the Q6_K files (opens in a new tab)

huggingface.co/unsloth/Kimi-Dev-72B-GGUF (opens in a new tab)

ollama run hf.co/unsloth/Kimi-Dev-72B-GGUF

Original weights · Hugging Face

Full-precision files from Moonshot AI, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.

huggingface.co/moonshotai/Kimi-Dev-72B (opens in a new tab)

No sign-in needed.

Official repo · GitHub

Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Moonshot AI. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.

github.com/MoonshotAI/Kimi-Dev (opens in a new tab)

git clone https://github.com/MoonshotAI/Kimi-Dev

Links checked 3 days ago against Hugging Face, Ollama and GitHub.

How it’s rated

Quality 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
How capable the model itself is at Q6_K, from its editorial quality tier scaled by the quantization or precision. It’s the same on any hardware that runs this variant. Scale: A+ 85+ · A 70+ · B 55+ · C 40+ · D under 40.
Runs Very slow
How well it runs on the Intel Core i5-1240P / i5-1340P NAS (96 GB): speed, capped by how well it fits in memory. Runs great: 30+ tokens/s (or near the image, video or decision speed target) · Runs well: 10+ tokens/s · Slow: 3+ tokens/s · Very slow: under 3 · Won’t run: doesn’t fit even with offload. A tight fit or RAM offload caps it at Runs well; heavy offload caps it at Slow.

Match score

To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.

Model qualityEditorial quality tier of the model, scaled by the quantization or precision used.35.6 / 45
Memory fitFull marks when the model fits in the share of the NAS’s memory that models can use (the rest stays with the NAS system and its storage services); fewer when it goes past that limit.25.0 / 25
SpeedGeneration speed against a 40 tokens/s target for LLMs, or render time against a target for image and video.1.6 / 15
Memory useRewards using the memory you have, so a bigger, better variant beats a tiny one that leaves most memory idle.15.0 / 15
Match score77.2 / 100

The match score orders results; it is not shown as a grade. Quality and Runs are the two ratings in the tables.

Every quantization on the Intel Core i5-1240P / i5-1340P NAS (96 GB)

Quant Memory needed Available Speed Runs Quality Download
Q2_K 39.0 GB 83.5 GB 1.0 tok/s Very slow 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GGUF (UD-Q2_K_XL) (opens in a new tab)
Q3_K_M 45.6 GB 83.5 GB 0.8 tok/s Very slow 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GGUF (opens in a new tab)
Q4_K_M 54.3 GB 83.5 GB 0.6 tok/s Very slow 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GGUF (Q4_0) (opens in a new tab)
Q5_K_M 61.6 GB 83.5 GB 0.5 tok/s Very slow 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GGUF (UD-Q5_K_XL) · folder (opens in a new tab)
Q6_K 69.6 GB 83.5 GB 0.4 tok/s Very slow 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab)
Q8_0 87.0 GB 83.5 GB 0.3 tok/s Very slowover memory limit 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab)
F16 155 GB 83.5 GB — Won't run 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab)

Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.

Other hardware that runs it

Quick answers

How much memory does Kimi Dev 72B need on the Intel Core i5-1240P / i5-1340P NAS 96GB?

At Q6_K it needs about 69.6 GB. The Intel Core i5-1240P / i5-1340P NAS 96GB has 83.5 GB usable.

How fast is Kimi Dev 72B on the Intel Core i5-1240P / i5-1340P NAS 96GB?

About 0.4 tok/s at Q6_K, an estimate from the hardware’s memory bandwidth and the size of the model.

Which quantization of Kimi Dev 72B should I use on the Intel Core i5-1240P / i5-1340P NAS 96GB?

Q6_K. Of the versions that fit, it is the one that runs best; when two run equally well, the check prefers the higher-rated one.

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.

Was this page helpful?