Kimi Dev 72B on NVIDIA GB300 Grace Blackwell Ultra Desktop Superchip
Can the NVIDIA GB300 Grace Blackwell Ultra Desktop Superchip run Kimi Dev 72B?
Yes, it runs great
Runs great. At Q8_0 it needs about 93.0 GB of 252 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 61.0 tok/s.
- Best quant
Q8_0- Generation speed
- 61.0 tok/s
- Prompt processing
- 792 tok/s
- First token (1K prompt)
- 1.3 s
- Largest safe context
- 128K
Best app to run it on the NVIDIA GB300 Grace Blackwell Ultra Desktop Superchip
On Windows
- Point-and-click: search, download and chat in one window.
On Linux
- The full model fits in GPU memory at 8-bit, so it can batch many requests: best for serving a team or an app.
vllm serve moonshotai/Kimi-Dev-72BDownload Kimi Dev 72B
Recommended for the NVIDIA GB300 Grace Blackwell Ultra Desktop Superchip: Q8_0. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.
Quantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
Download the Q8_0 files (opens in a new tab)
huggingface.co/unsloth/Kimi-Dev-72B-GGUF (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/unsloth/Kimi-Dev-72B-GGUFOriginal weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from Moonshot AI, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Moonshot AI. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/MoonshotAI/Kimi-Dev (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/MoonshotAI/Kimi-DevHow it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 36.0 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 25.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 8.5 / 15 | |
| Match score | 84.5 / 100 |
Every quantization on the NVIDIA GB300 Grace Blackwell Ultra Desktop Superchip
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 45.0 GB | 252 GB | 197 tok/s | Runs great | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (UD-Q2_K_XL) (opens in a new tab) |
Q3_K_M | 51.5 GB | 252 GB | 155 tok/s | Runs great | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 60.2 GB | 252 GB | 120 tok/s | Runs great | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (Q4_0) (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 67.5 GB | 252 GB | 99.0 tok/s | Runs great | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (UD-Q5_K_XL) · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 75.5 GB | 252 GB | 83.2 tok/s | Runs great | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 93.0 GB | 252 GB | 61.0 tok/s | Runs great | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 161 GB | 252 GB | 28.1 tok/s | Runs well | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Other hardware that runs it
-
76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
-
67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Max (64 GB)
-
76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M2 Ultra (192 GB)
-
76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M3 Ultra (256 GB)
-
67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Max (128 GB)
-
76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M3 Ultra (512 GB)
Quick answers
How much memory does Kimi Dev 72B need on the NVIDIA GB300 Grace Blackwell Ultra Desktop Superchip 252GB?
At Q8_0 it needs about 93.0 GB. The NVIDIA GB300 Grace Blackwell Ultra Desktop Superchip 252GB has 252 GB usable.
How fast is Kimi Dev 72B on the NVIDIA GB300 Grace Blackwell Ultra Desktop Superchip 252GB?
About 61.0 tok/s at Q8_0, an estimate from the hardware’s memory bandwidth and the size of the model.
Which quantization of Kimi Dev 72B should I use on the NVIDIA GB300 Grace Blackwell Ultra Desktop Superchip 252GB?
Q8_0. Of the versions that fit, it is the one that runs best; when two run equally well, the check prefers the higher-rated one.
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.