Ling 1T on Intel Core 3 304 / Core 5 320 NAS (16 GB)
Can the Intel Core 3 304 / Core 5 320 NAS (16 GB) run Ling 1T?
No, it doesn’t fit
No. Ling 1T needs about 404 GB even at Q2_K; the Intel Core 3 304 / Core 5 320 NAS (16 GB) has 12.0 GB usable.
Download Ling 1T
Recommended: Q2_K. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.
Quantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
Download the Q2_K files (opens in a new tab)
huggingface.co/unsloth/Ling-1T-GGUF (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/unsloth/Ling-1T-GGUFOriginal weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from Ant Group (inclusionAI), for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Ant Group (inclusionAI). The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/inclusionAI/Ling-V2 (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/inclusionAI/Ling-V2How it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 8.5 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 0.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 0.0 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 0.0 / 15 | |
| Match score | 8.5 / 100 |
Every quantization on the Intel Core 3 304 / Core 5 320 NAS (16 GB)
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 404 GB | 12.0 GB | — | Won't run | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q3_K_M | 494 GB | 12.0 GB | — | Won't run | 75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 614 GB | 12.0 GB | — | Won't run | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 714 GB | 12.0 GB | — | Won't run | 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 824 GB | 12.0 GB | — | Won't run | 89Excellent quality (A+) · 89 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 1,064 GB | 12.0 GB | — | Won't run | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 2,004 GB | 12.0 GB | — | Won't run | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Hardware that can run it
-
63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M3 Ultra (512 GB)
-
63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (512 GB)
-
63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M5 Ultra (512 GB)
-
63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Intel Xeon Silver (4100 to 4300 series) NAS (512 GB)
-
63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Intel Xeon W-2100 series NAS (512 GB)
-
63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Intel Xeon D-2700 series NAS (512 GB)
Models that do run on the Intel Core 3 304 / Core 5 320 NAS (16 GB)
- 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Gemma 4 12B
- 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. K2 Horizon 7B
- 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Mellum2.1 Thinking (12B-A2.5B)
- 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Maple Preview (20B-A1B)
- 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. MiMo V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
Quick answers
How much memory does Ling 1T need on the Intel Core 3 304 / Core 5 320 NAS 16GB?
Even at Q2_K it needs about 404 GB; the Intel Core 3 304 / Core 5 320 NAS 16GB has 12.0 GB usable.
What can the Intel Core 3 304 / Core 5 320 NAS 16GB run instead?
Gemma 4 12B, K2 Horizon 7B and Mellum2.1 Thinking (12B-A2.5B) run best on it; the page lists more, each with its speed.
What hardware can run Ling 1T?
M3 Ultra 512GB, AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS 512GB and M5 Ultra 512GB run it; the page lists more, each with its speed.
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.