Ling 2.6 1T on Apple M2 Ultra (192 GB)
Can the Apple M2 Ultra (192 GB) run Ling 2.6 1T?
No, it doesn’t fit
No. Ling 2.6 1T needs about 422 GB even at Q2_K; the Apple M2 Ultra (192 GB) has 144 GB usable.
Download Ling 2.6 1T
Original weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from Ant Group (inclusionAI), for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Ant Group (inclusionAI). The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/inclusionAI/Ling-V2 (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/inclusionAI/Ling-V2How it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 8.7 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 0.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 0.0 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 0.0 / 15 | |
| Match score | 8.7 / 100 |
Every quantization on the Apple M2 Ultra (192 GB)
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 422 GB | 144 GB | — | Won't run | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | All files (opens in a new tab) |
Q3_K_M | 515 GB | 144 GB | — | Won't run | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | All files (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 638 GB | 144 GB | — | Won't run | 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | All files (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 740 GB | 144 GB | — | Won't run | 89Excellent quality (A+) · 89 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | All files (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 853 GB | 144 GB | — | Won't run | 91Excellent quality (A+) · 91 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | All files (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 1,099 GB | 144 GB | — | Won't run | 92Excellent quality (A+) · 92 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | All files (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 2,063 GB | 144 GB | — | Won't run | 92Excellent quality (A+) · 92 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Hardware that can run it
-
64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M3 Ultra (512 GB)
-
64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (512 GB)
-
64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M5 Ultra (512 GB)
-
64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Intel Xeon Silver (4100 to 4300 series) NAS (512 GB)
-
64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Intel Xeon W-2100 series NAS (512 GB)
-
64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Intel Xeon D-2700 series NAS (512 GB)
Models that do run on the Apple M2 Ultra (192 GB)
- 92Excellent quality (A+) · 92 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 96/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B-A12B
- 91Excellent quality (A+) · 91 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 96/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Ornith 1.5 122B-A10B
- 92Excellent quality (A+) · 92 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 96/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B
- 91Excellent quality (A+) · 91 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 96/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3.8 Flash Next (125B-A6B)
- 91Excellent quality (A+) · 91 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 95/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
Quick answers
How much memory does Ling 2.6 1T need on the M2 Ultra 192GB?
Even at Q2_K it needs about 422 GB; the M2 Ultra 192GB has 144 GB usable.
What can the M2 Ultra 192GB run instead?
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B-A12B, Ornith 1.5 122B-A10B and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B run best on it; the page lists more, each with its speed.
What hardware can run Ling 2.6 1T?
M3 Ultra 512GB, AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS 512GB and M5 Ultra 512GB run it; the page lists more, each with its speed.
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.