Ling 3.0 flash Sante on LattePanda Sigma (32 GB)
Can the LattePanda Sigma (32 GB) run Ling 3.0 flash Sante?
No, it doesn’t fit
No. Ling 3.0 flash Sante needs about 52.9 GB even at Q2_K; the LattePanda Sigma (32 GB) has 16.0 GB usable.
Download Ling 3.0 flash Sante
Recommended: Q2_K. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.
Quantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
Download the Q2_K file (opens in a new tab)
huggingface.co/bartowski/Ling-3.0-flash-Sante-GGUF (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/bartowski/Ling-3.0-flash-Sante-GGUF:Q2_KOriginal weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from Ant Group (inclusionAI), for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
huggingface.co/inclusionAI/Ling-3.0-flash-Sante (opens in a new tab)
How it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 6.4 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 0.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 0.0 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 0.0 / 15 | |
| Match score | 6.4 / 100 |
Every quantization on the LattePanda Sigma (32 GB)
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 52.9 GB | 16.0 GB | — | Won't run | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q3_K_M | 64.4 GB | 16.0 GB | — | Won't run | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 79.7 GB | 16.0 GB | — | Won't run | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 92.5 GB | 16.0 GB | — | Won't run | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 106 GB | 16.0 GB | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 137 GB | 16.0 GB | — | Won't run | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 257 GB | 16.0 GB | — | Won't run | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Hardware that can run it
-
68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M3 Ultra (256 GB)
-
67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M2 Ultra (192 GB)
-
67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GB10 (128 GB)
-
64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X (6144-core GPU) (128 GB)
-
65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
-
64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (128 GB)
Models that do run on the LattePanda Sigma (32 GB)
- 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Gemma 4 26B-A4B
- 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Maple Preview (20B-A1B)
- 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. KAT-Coder V2.5 Dev (35B-A3B)
- 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. gpt-oss 20B
- 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Mellum2.1 Thinking (12B-A2.5B)
Quick answers
How much memory does Ling 3.0 flash Sante need on the LattePanda Sigma 32GB?
Even at Q2_K it needs about 52.9 GB; the LattePanda Sigma 32GB has 16.0 GB usable.
What can the LattePanda Sigma 32GB run instead?
Gemma 4 26B-A4B, Maple Preview (20B-A1B) and KAT-Coder V2.5 Dev (35B-A3B) run best on it; the page lists more, each with its speed.
What hardware can run Ling 3.0 flash Sante?
M3 Ultra 256GB, M2 Ultra 192GB and NVIDIA GB10 128GB run it; the page lists more, each with its speed.
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.