Ling Mini 2.0 (16B-A1.4B) on AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (DDR5 SO-DIMM) (96 GB)

Can the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (DDR5 SO-DIMM) (96 GB) run Ling Mini 2.0 (16B-A1.4B)?

Yes, it runs great

Runs great. At Q6_K it needs about 20.0 GB of 72.0 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 40.1 tok/s.

Best quant: Q6_K
Generation speed: 40.1 tok/s
Prompt processing: 10,540 tok/s
First token (1K prompt): 0.3 s
Largest safe context: 32K

Best app to run it on the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (DDR5 SO-DIMM) (96 GB)

On Windows

Lemonade

Desktop app · runs on llama.cpp, ONNX Runtime GenAI (Ryzen AI NPU)

Built for Ryzen AI and Strix Halo, including NPU + iGPU modes on Windows.

lemonade pull inclusionAI/Ling-mini-2.0-GGUF:Q6_K

LM Studio Point-and-click: search, download and chat in one window.
llama.cpp Usually the first to support new model architectures.

On Linux

Lemonade

Desktop app · runs on llama.cpp, ONNX Runtime GenAI (Ryzen AI NPU)

Built for Ryzen AI and Strix Halo, including NPU + iGPU modes on Windows.

lemonade pull inclusionAI/Ling-mini-2.0-GGUF:Q6_K

LM Studio Point-and-click: search, download and chat in one window.
llama.cpp Usually the first to support new model architectures.

How we choose: the files published for this model, your operating system and GPU, whether it fits fully in memory, and published speed tests (MLX vs llama.cpp on Apple silicon, vLLM vs llama.cpp vs Ollama on NVIDIA). Details.

Download Ling Mini 2.0 (16B-A1.4B)

Recommended for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (DDR5 SO-DIMM) (96 GB): Q6_K. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.

Quantized files · GGUF

Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.

Download the Q6_K file (opens in a new tab)

huggingface.co/inclusionAI/Ling-mini-2.0-GGUF (opens in a new tab)

ollama run hf.co/inclusionAI/Ling-mini-2.0-GGUF:Q6_K

Original weights · Hugging Face

Full-precision files from Ant Group (inclusionAI), for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.

huggingface.co/inclusionAI/Ling-mini-2.0 (opens in a new tab)

No sign-in needed.

Official repo · GitHub

Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Ant Group (inclusionAI). The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.

github.com/inclusionAI/Ling-V2 (opens in a new tab)

git clone https://github.com/inclusionAI/Ling-V2

Links checked 3 days ago against Hugging Face, Ollama and GitHub.

How it’s rated

Quality 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.: How capable the model itself is at Q6_K, from its editorial quality tier scaled by the quantization or precision. It’s the same on any hardware that runs this variant. Scale: A+ 85+ · A 70+ · B 55+ · C 40+ · D under 40.
Runs Runs great: How well it runs on the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (DDR5 SO-DIMM) (96 GB): speed, capped by how well it fits in memory. Runs great: 30+ tokens/s (or near the image, video or decision speed target) · Runs well: 10+ tokens/s · Slow: 3+ tokens/s · Very slow: under 3 · Won’t run: doesn’t fit even with offload. A tight fit or RAM offload caps it at Runs well; heavy offload caps it at Slow.

Match score

To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.

Model qualityEditorial quality tier of the model, scaled by the quantization or precision used.	23.2 / 45
Memory fitFull marks when the model fits in the share of unified memory the GPU can use; fewer when it goes past that limit.	25.0 / 25
SpeedGeneration speed against a 40 tokens/s target for LLMs, or render time against a target for image and video.	15.0 / 15
Memory useRewards using the memory you have, so a bigger, better variant beats a tiny one that leaves most memory idle.	6.4 / 15
Match score	69.6 / 100

The match score orders results; it is not shown as a grade. Quality and Runs are the two ratings in the tables.

Every quantization on the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (DDR5 SO-DIMM) (96 GB)

Quant	Memory needed	Available	Speed	Runs	Quality	Download
`Q2_K`	13.2 GB	72.0 GB	82.5 tok/s	Runs great	36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`Q3_K_M`	14.7 GB	72.0 GB	68.1 tok/s	Runs great	43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF files (opens in a new tab)
`Q4_K_M`	16.6 GB	72.0 GB	55.1 tok/s	Runs great	49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`Q5_K_M`	18.2 GB	72.0 GB	46.7 tok/s	Runs great	50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF files (opens in a new tab)
`Q6_K`	20.0 GB	72.0 GB	40.1 tok/s	Runs great	51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`Q8_0`	23.9 GB	72.0 GB	30.4 tok/s	Runs great	52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`F16`	39.2 GB	72.0 GB	14.8 tok/s	Runs well	52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab)

Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.

Other hardware that runs it

52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX Q8_0 · 154 tok/s · Runs great
52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Apple M1 Max (64 GB) F16 · 54.1 tok/s · Runs great
52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Apple M4 Max (64 GB) F16 · 68.0 tok/s · Runs great
52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Q8_0 · 161 tok/s · Runs great
52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Q8_0 · 166 tok/s · Runs great
50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT Q5_K_M · 167 tok/s · Runs great

Quick answers

How much memory does Ling Mini 2.0 (16B-A1.4B) need on the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (DDR5 SO-DIMM) 96GB?

At Q6_K it needs about 20.0 GB. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (DDR5 SO-DIMM) 96GB has 72.0 GB usable.

How fast is Ling Mini 2.0 (16B-A1.4B) on the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (DDR5 SO-DIMM) 96GB?

About 40.1 tok/s at Q6_K, an estimate from the hardware’s memory bandwidth and the size of the model.

Which quantization of Ling Mini 2.0 (16B-A1.4B) should I use on the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (DDR5 SO-DIMM) 96GB?

Q6_K. Of the versions that fit, it is the one that runs best; when two run equally well, the check prefers the higher-rated one.

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.