Can the Intel Arc Pro B60 run Llama 2 7B Chat?

Yes, it runs great

Runs great. At Q6_K it needs about 9.5 GB of 24.0 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 44.0 tok/s.

Best quant: Q6_K
Generation speed: 44.0 tok/s
Prompt processing: 2,007 tok/s
First token (1K prompt): 0.5 s
Largest safe context: 4K

Best app to run it on the Intel Arc Pro B60

On Windows

Command line + local API · runs on llama.cpp

Supports Intel Arc through SYCL and Vulkan.
Usually the first to support new model architectures.

llama-server -hf TheBloke/Llama-2-7B-Chat-GGUF:Q6_K

LM Studio Point-and-click: search, download and chat in one window.
Ollama Intel GPU support here is experimental (Vulkan).

On Linux

llama.cpp

Command line + local API · runs on llama.cpp

Supports Intel Arc through SYCL and Vulkan.
Usually the first to support new model architectures.

llama-server -hf TheBloke/Llama-2-7B-Chat-GGUF:Q6_K

LM Studio Point-and-click: search, download and chat in one window.
Ollama Intel GPU support here is experimental (Vulkan).

How we choose: the files published for this model, your operating system and GPU, whether it fits fully in memory, and published speed tests (MLX vs llama.cpp on Apple silicon, vLLM vs llama.cpp vs Ollama on NVIDIA). Details.

Download Llama 2 7B Chat

Recommended for the Intel Arc Pro B60: Q6_K. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.

Quickest · Ollama

One command downloads a ready-to-run version and starts a chat.

Get Ollama at ollama.com/download (opens in a new tab) · model page (opens in a new tab)

ollama run llama2:7b-chat-q6_K

Quantized files · GGUF

Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.

Download the Q6_K file (opens in a new tab)

huggingface.co/TheBloke/Llama-2-7B-Chat-GGUF (opens in a new tab)

ollama run hf.co/TheBloke/Llama-2-7B-Chat-GGUF:Q6_K

Original weights · Hugging Face

Full-precision files from Meta, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.

huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-chat-hf (opens in a new tab)

Free Hugging Face account needed: request access on the model page, and Meta approves it (usually within minutes to a few hours).

Official repo · GitHub

Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Meta. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.

github.com/meta-llama/llama (opens in a new tab)

Meta’s original Llama 2 repo (now archived).

git clone https://github.com/meta-llama/llama

Links checked 2 days ago against Hugging Face, Ollama and GitHub.

How it’s rated

Quality 19Basic quality (D) · 19 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.: How capable the model itself is at Q6_K, from its editorial quality tier scaled by the quantization or precision. It’s the same on any hardware that runs this variant. Scale: A+ 85+ · A 70+ · B 55+ · C 40+ · D under 40.
Runs Runs great: How well it runs on the Intel Arc Pro B60: speed, capped by how well it fits in memory. Runs great: 30+ tokens/s (or near the image, video or decision speed target) · Runs well: 10+ tokens/s · Slow: 3+ tokens/s · Very slow: under 3 · Won’t run: doesn’t fit even with offload. A tight fit or RAM offload caps it at Runs well; heavy offload caps it at Slow.

Match score

To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.

Model qualityEditorial quality tier of the model, scaled by the quantization or precision used.	8.9 / 45
Memory fitFull marks when everything sits in GPU memory; fewer when part spills to system RAM.	25.0 / 25
SpeedGeneration speed against a 40 tokens/s target for LLMs, or render time against a target for image and video.	15.0 / 15
Memory useRewards using the memory you have, so a bigger, better variant beats a tiny one that leaves most memory idle.	9.1 / 15
Match score	58.0 / 100

The match score orders results; it is not shown as a grade. Quality and Runs are the two ratings in the tables.

Every quantization on the Intel Arc Pro B60

Quant	Memory needed	Available	Speed	Runs	Quality	Download
`Q2_K`	6.6 GB	24.0 GB	104 tok/s	Runs great	14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`Q3_K_M`	7.3 GB	24.0 GB	82.0 tok/s	Runs great	16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`Q4_K_M`	8.1 GB	24.0 GB	63.4 tok/s	Runs great	19Basic quality (D) · 19 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`Q5_K_M`	8.7 GB	24.0 GB	52.4 tok/s	Runs great	19Basic quality (D) · 19 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`Q6_K`	9.5 GB	24.0 GB	44.0 tok/s	Runs great	19Basic quality (D) · 19 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`Q8_0`	11.1 GB	24.0 GB	32.3 tok/s	Runs great	20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`F16`	17.4 GB	24.0 GB	14.9 tok/s	Runs well	20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	Original weights (opens in a new tab)

Memory figures assume 4K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.

Other hardware that runs it

20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT Q8_0 · 51.1 tok/s · Runs great
20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Q8_0 · 62.3 tok/s · Runs great
20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER Q8_0 · 68.2 tok/s · Runs great
20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 F16 · 43.1 tok/s · Runs great
20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB Q8_0 · 41.5 tok/s · Runs great
20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Q8_0 · 83.1 tok/s · Runs great

Quick answers

How much memory does Llama 2 7B Chat need on the Arc Pro B60 24GB?

At Q6_K it needs about 9.5 GB. The Arc Pro B60 24GB has 24.0 GB usable.

How fast is Llama 2 7B Chat on the Arc Pro B60 24GB?

About 44.0 tok/s at Q6_K, an estimate from the hardware’s memory bandwidth and the size of the model.

Which quantization of Llama 2 7B Chat should I use on the Arc Pro B60 24GB?

Q6_K. Of the versions that fit, it is the one that runs best; when two run equally well, the check prefers the higher-rated one.

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.