Llama 3.1 70B Instruct on AMD Radeon PRO W7900
Can the AMD Radeon PRO W7900 run Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?
Yes, it runs well
Runs well. At Q3_K_M it needs about 40.3 GB of 48.0 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 16.7 tok/s.
- Best quant
Q3_K_M- Generation speed
- 16.7 tok/s
- Prompt processing
- 1,077 tok/s
- First token (1K prompt)
- 1.0 s
- Largest safe context
- 31K
Best app to run it on the AMD Radeon PRO W7900
On Windows
- AMD’s own app: llama.cpp tuned for Radeon on Vulkan and ROCm.
lemonade pull bartowski/Meta-Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct-GGUF:Q3_K_MDownload Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Recommended for the AMD Radeon PRO W7900: Q3_K_M. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.
Quickest · Ollama
One command downloads a ready-to-run version and starts a chat.
ollama run llama3.1:70b-instruct-q3_K_MQuantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
Download the Q3_K_M file (opens in a new tab)
huggingface.co/bartowski/Meta-Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct-GGUF (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/bartowski/Meta-Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct-GGUF:Q3_K_MOriginal weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from Meta, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct (opens in a new tab)
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Meta. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/meta-llama/llama-models (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-modelsHow it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 26.5 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 25.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 9.7 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Match score | 76.2 / 100 |
Every quantization on the AMD Radeon PRO W7900
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 33.9 GB | 48.0 GB | 21.2 tok/s | Runs well | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q3_K_M | 40.3 GB | 48.0 GB | 16.7 tok/s | Runs well | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 48.8 GB | 48.0 GB | 11.0 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 55.8 GB | 48.0 GB | 4.1 tok/s | Slowoffloads to RAM | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 63.6 GB | 48.0 GB | 2.4 tok/s | Very slowoffloads to RAM | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 80.5 GB | 48.0 GB | — | Won't run | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 147 GB | 48.0 GB | — | Won't run | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Other hardware that runs it
-
66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
-
58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Max (64 GB)
-
66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M2 Ultra (192 GB)
-
66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M3 Ultra (256 GB)
-
58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Max (128 GB)
-
66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M3 Ultra (512 GB)
Quick answers
How much memory does Llama 3.1 70B Instruct need on the PRO W7900 48GB?
At Q3_K_M it needs about 40.3 GB. The PRO W7900 48GB has 48.0 GB usable.
How fast is Llama 3.1 70B Instruct on the PRO W7900 48GB?
About 16.7 tok/s at Q3_K_M, an estimate from the hardware’s memory bandwidth and the size of the model.
Which quantization of Llama 3.1 70B Instruct should I use on the PRO W7900 48GB?
Q3_K_M. Of the versions that fit, it is the one that runs best; when two run equally well, the check prefers the higher-rated one.
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.