Maple Preview (20B-A1B) on LattePanda Sigma (16 GB)
Can the LattePanda Sigma (16 GB) run Maple Preview (20B-A1B)?
Yes, but slowly (far over GPU memory limit)
Slow (far over GPU memory limit). At Q2_K it needs about 9.4 GB of 8.0 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 67.6 tok/s.
- Best quant
Q2_K- Generation speed
- 67.6 tok/s
- Prompt processing
- 1,366 tok/s
- First token (1K prompt)
- 0.7 s
- Largest safe context
- —
Best app to run it on the LattePanda Sigma (16 GB)
On Windows
- Splits the model between GPU memory and system RAM, which this setup needs.
- Gives you direct control of how many layers sit on the GPU, the best way to squeeze a model that doesn’t quite fit.
- Supports Intel Arc through SYCL and Vulkan.
llama-server -hf deepgrove/maple-preview-GGUF:Q2_KOn Linux
- Splits the model between GPU memory and system RAM, which this setup needs.
- Gives you direct control of how many layers sit on the GPU, the best way to squeeze a model that doesn’t quite fit.
- Supports Intel Arc through SYCL and Vulkan.
llama-server -hf deepgrove/maple-preview-GGUF:Q2_KDownload Maple Preview (20B-A1B)
Quantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
huggingface.co/deepgrove/maple-preview-GGUF (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/deepgrove/maple-preview-GGUFOriginal weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from DeepGrove, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from DeepGrove. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/deepgrove-ai/llama.cpp (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/deepgrove-ai/llama.cppHow it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 22.1 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 4.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Match score | 56.1 / 100 |
Every quantization on the LattePanda Sigma (16 GB)
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 9.4 GB | 8.0 GB | 67.6 tok/s | Slowfar over GPU memory limit | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q3_K_M | 11.3 GB | 8.0 GB | — | Won't run | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 13.7 GB | 8.0 GB | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 15.7 GB | 8.0 GB | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 17.9 GB | 8.0 GB | — | Won't run | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 22.8 GB | 8.0 GB | — | Won't run | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 41.8 GB | 8.0 GB | — | Won't run | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Other hardware that runs it
-
70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Pro (48 GB)
-
70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
-
69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
-
69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
-
69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
-
67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT
Quick answers
How much memory does Maple Preview (20B-A1B) need on the LattePanda Sigma 16GB?
At Q2_K it needs about 9.4 GB. The LattePanda Sigma 16GB has 8.0 GB usable.
How fast is Maple Preview (20B-A1B) on the LattePanda Sigma 16GB?
About 67.6 tok/s at Q2_K, an estimate from the hardware’s memory bandwidth and the size of the model.
Which quantization of Maple Preview (20B-A1B) should I use on the LattePanda Sigma 16GB?
Q2_K. Of the versions that fit, it is the one that runs best; when two run equally well, the check prefers the higher-rated one.
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.