MiMo V2.5 (310B-A15B) on Intel Core Ultra 5 225 / 7 265 / 9 285 (desktop) NAS (192 GB)

Can the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 / 7 265 / 9 285 (desktop) NAS (192 GB) run MiMo V2.5 (310B-A15B)?

Yes, but slowly (tight fit)

Slow (tight fit). At Q3_K_M it needs about 167 GB of 173 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 7.7 tok/s.

Best quant: Q3_K_M
Generation speed: 7.7 tok/s
Prompt processing: 32.0 tok/s
First token (1K prompt): 32.0 s
Largest safe context: 194K

Best app to run it on the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 / 7 265 / 9 285 (desktop) NAS (192 GB)

On Linux

llama.cpp

Command line + local API · runs on llama.cpp

Usually the first to support new model architectures.

llama-server -hf unsloth/MiMo-V2.5-GGUF:Q3_K_M

Ollama Runs the Hugging Face GGUF with ollama run hf.co/…
KoboldCpp

Want an agent? MiMo V2.5 (310B-A15B) supports tool use, so you can pair a llama.cpp or MLX LM server with one of these. Apps that run on this computer come first.

Coding agents

Personal assistants

How we choose: the files published for this model, which apps run in a container on a NAS without a graphics card (models run on its processor), and whether the model fits fully in the memory models can use. Details.

Download MiMo V2.5 (310B-A15B)

Recommended for the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 / 7 265 / 9 285 (desktop) NAS (192 GB): Q3_K_M. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.

Quantized files · GGUF

Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.

Download the Q3_K_M files (opens in a new tab)

huggingface.co/unsloth/MiMo-V2.5-GGUF (opens in a new tab)

ollama run hf.co/unsloth/MiMo-V2.5-GGUF

Original weights · Hugging Face

Full-precision files from Xiaomi, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.

huggingface.co/XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2.5 (opens in a new tab)

No sign-in needed.

Links checked 3 days ago against Hugging Face, Ollama and GitHub.

How it’s rated

Quality 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.: How capable the model itself is at Q3_K_M, from its editorial quality tier scaled by the quantization or precision. It’s the same on any hardware that runs this variant. Scale: A+ 85+ · A 70+ · B 55+ · C 40+ · D under 40.
Runs Slowtight fit: How well it runs on the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 / 7 265 / 9 285 (desktop) NAS (192 GB): speed, capped by how well it fits in memory. Runs great: 30+ tokens/s (or near the image, video or decision speed target) · Runs well: 10+ tokens/s · Slow: 3+ tokens/s · Very slow: under 3 · Won’t run: doesn’t fit even with offload. A tight fit or RAM offload caps it at Runs well; heavy offload caps it at Slow.

Match score

To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.

Model qualityEditorial quality tier of the model, scaled by the quantization or precision used.	35.5 / 45
Memory fitFull marks when the model fits in the share of the NAS’s memory that models can use (the rest stays with the NAS system and its storage services); fewer when it goes past that limit.	24.0 / 25
SpeedGeneration speed against a 40 tokens/s target for LLMs, or render time against a target for image and video.	6.6 / 15
Memory useRewards using the memory you have, so a bigger, better variant beats a tiny one that leaves most memory idle.	15.0 / 15
Match score	81.1 / 100

The match score orders results; it is not shown as a grade. Quality and Runs are the two ratings in the tables.

Every quantization on the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 / 7 265 / 9 285 (desktop) NAS (192 GB)

Quant	Memory needed	Available	Speed	Runs	Quality	Download
`Q2_K`	139 GB	173 GB	9.7 tok/s	Slow	65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (UD-Q2_K_XL) · folder (opens in a new tab)
`Q3_K_M`	167 GB	173 GB	7.7 tok/s	Slowtight fit	78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab)
`Q4_K_M`	204 GB	173 GB	—	Won't run	89Excellent quality (A+) · 89 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab)
`Q5_K_M`	235 GB	173 GB	—	Won't run	91Excellent quality (A+) · 91 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab)
`Q6_K`	269 GB	173 GB	—	Won't run	93Excellent quality (A+) · 93 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab)
`Q8_0`	344 GB	173 GB	—	Won't run	94Excellent quality (A+) · 94 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab)
`F16`	636 GB	173 GB	—	Won't run	94Excellent quality (A+) · 94 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab)

Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.

Other hardware that runs it

91Excellent quality (A+) · 91 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 96/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Apple M3 Ultra (512 GB) Q5_K_M · 40.9 tok/s · Runs great
78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Apple M3 Ultra (256 GB) Q3_K_M · 60.1 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Apple M2 Ultra (192 GB) Q2_K · 71.8 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
93Excellent quality (A+) · 93 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 96/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Apple M5 Ultra (512 GB) Q6_K · 48.4 tok/s · Runs great
91Excellent quality (A+) · 91 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 96/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. AMD Instinct MI350X Q5_K_M · 177 tok/s · Runs great
89Excellent quality (A+) · 89 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 95/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. AMD Instinct MI325X Q4_K_M · 175 tok/s · Runs great

Quick answers

How much memory does MiMo V2.5 (310B-A15B) need on the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 / 7 265 / 9 285 (desktop) NAS 192GB?

At Q3_K_M it needs about 167 GB. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 / 7 265 / 9 285 (desktop) NAS 192GB has 173 GB usable.

How fast is MiMo V2.5 (310B-A15B) on the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 / 7 265 / 9 285 (desktop) NAS 192GB?

About 7.7 tok/s at Q3_K_M, an estimate from the hardware’s memory bandwidth and the size of the model.

Which quantization of MiMo V2.5 (310B-A15B) should I use on the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 / 7 265 / 9 285 (desktop) NAS 192GB?

Q3_K_M. Of the versions that fit, it is the one that runs best; when two run equally well, the check prefers the higher-rated one.

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.