Ming-Image 0.1 Design on AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (32 GB)

Can the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (32 GB) run Ming-Image 0.1 Design?

Yes, but slowly (tight fit · encoder unloaded after use)

Slow (tight fit · encoder unloaded after use). At FP8 it needs about 20.6 GB of 24.0 GB usable and takes about 59 s per image.

Best precision: FP8
Memory mode: Text encoder offloaded
Time per image: 59 s
Output: 2048×2048, 12 steps

Best app to run it on the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (32 GB)

On Windows

ComfyUI

Desktop app · runs on PyTorch (ComfyUI), GGUF via ComfyUI-GGUF

Runs this model with built-in or popular custom nodes; GGUF files load with ComfyUI-GGUF.

Get ComfyUI

On Linux

ComfyUI

Desktop app · runs on PyTorch (ComfyUI), GGUF via ComfyUI-GGUF

Runs this model with built-in or popular custom nodes; GGUF files load with ComfyUI-GGUF.

Get ComfyUI

How we choose: the files published for this model, your operating system and GPU, whether it fits fully in memory, and published speed tests (MLX vs llama.cpp on Apple silicon, vLLM vs llama.cpp vs Ollama on NVIDIA). Details.

Download Ming-Image 0.1 Design

Original weights · Hugging Face

Full-precision files from Ant Group (inclusionAI), for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers, Diffusers or ComfyUI.

huggingface.co/inclusionAI/Ming-Image-0.1-Design (opens in a new tab)

No sign-in needed.

Official repo · GitHub

Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Ant Group (inclusionAI). The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.

github.com/inclusionAI/Ming-Image (opens in a new tab)

Official inference code (infer.py) for text-to-image and transparent RGBA output; the model card also recommends vLLM-Omni for serving.

git clone https://github.com/inclusionAI/Ming-Image

Links checked 7 days ago against Hugging Face, Ollama and GitHub.

How it’s rated

Quality 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.: How capable the model itself is at FP8, from its editorial quality tier scaled by the quantization or precision. It’s the same on any hardware that runs this variant. Scale: A+ 85+ · A 70+ · B 55+ · C 40+ · D under 40.
Runs Slowtight fit · encoder unloaded after use: How well it runs on the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (32 GB): speed, capped by how well it fits in memory. Runs great: 30+ tokens/s (or near the image, video or decision speed target) · Runs well: 10+ tokens/s · Slow: 3+ tokens/s · Very slow: under 3 · Won’t run: doesn’t fit even with offload. A tight fit or RAM offload caps it at Runs well; heavy offload caps it at Slow.

Match score

To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.

Model qualityEditorial quality tier of the model, scaled by the quantization or precision used.	37.9 / 45
Memory fitFull marks when the model fits in the share of unified memory the GPU can use; fewer when it goes past that limit.	18.0 / 25
SpeedGeneration speed against a 40 tokens/s target for LLMs, or render time against a target for image and video.	6.2 / 15
Memory useRewards using the memory you have, so a bigger, better variant beats a tiny one that leaves most memory idle.	15.0 / 15
Match score	77.1 / 100

The match score orders results; it is not shown as a grade. Quality and Runs are the two ratings in the tables.

Every precision on the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (32 GB)

Quant	Memory needed	Available	Speed	Memory mode	Runs	Quality	Download
`FP16`	18.5 GB	24.0 GB	81 s	Sequential CPU offload	SlowCPU offload	86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	Original weights (opens in a new tab)
`FP8`	20.6 GB	24.0 GB	59 s	Text encoder offloaded	Slowtight fit · encoder unloaded after use	84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	Original weights (opens in a new tab)

Other hardware that runs it

86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 92/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell FP16 · 12 s · Runs great
86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (128 GB) FP16 · 31 s · Runs well
86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 FP16 · 14 s · Runs well (encoder in RAM)
86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X (6144-core GPU) (128 GB) FP16 · 36 s · Runs well
86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GB10 (128 GB) FP16 · 34 s · Runs well
84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 FP8 · 15 s · Runs well (tight fit · encoder in RAM)

Quick answers

How much memory does Ming-Image 0.1 Design need on the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 32GB?

At FP8 it needs about 20.6 GB. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 32GB has 24.0 GB usable.

How long does Ming-Image 0.1 Design take on the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 32GB?

About 59 s per image at FP8 and default settings, an estimate scaled from a reference timing by this hardware’s compute speed.

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.