MiniMax M2.1 (230B-A10B) on Apple M2 Ultra (192 GB)
Can the Apple M2 Ultra (192 GB) run MiniMax M2.1 (230B-A10B)?
Yes, it runs well (tight fit)
Runs well (tight fit). At Q3_K_M it needs about 126 GB of 144 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 80.7 tok/s.
- Best quant
Q3_K_M- Generation speed
- 80.7 tok/s
- Prompt processing
- 1,686 tok/s
- First token (1K prompt)
- 0.6 s
- Largest safe context
- 76K
Best app to run it on the Apple M2 Ultra (192 GB)
On macOS
- Runs the MLX build, typically 20–35% faster than GGUF for a model with 10B active parameters on Apple silicon.
- Point-and-click: search, download and chat in one window.
Download MiniMax M2.1 (230B-A10B)
Recommended for the Apple M2 Ultra (192 GB): Q3_K_M. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.
Ollama
Ollama only offered this as a cloud model, and has since retired it. To run it locally, use the GGUF files below with llama.cpp or LM Studio.
Quantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
Download the Q3_K_M files (opens in a new tab)
huggingface.co/unsloth/MiniMax-M2.1-GGUF (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/unsloth/MiniMax-M2.1-GGUFOriginal weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from MiniMax, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from MiniMax. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/MiniMax-AI/MiniMax-M2.1 (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/MiniMax-AI/MiniMax-M2.1How it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 34.4 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 24.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Match score | 88.4 / 100 |
Every quantization on the Apple M2 Ultra (192 GB)
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 106 GB | 144 GB | 96.8 tok/s | Runs great | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q3_K_M | 126 GB | 144 GB | 80.7 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 154 GB | 144 GB | 56.0 tok/s | Runs wellover GPU memory limit | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 177 GB | 144 GB | 47.7 tok/s | Slowfar over GPU memory limit | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 202 GB | 144 GB | — | Won't run | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 257 GB | 144 GB | — | Won't run | 91Excellent quality (A+) · 91 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 472 GB | 144 GB | — | Won't run | 91Excellent quality (A+) · 91 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Other hardware that runs it
-
86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M3 Ultra (256 GB)
-
90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M3 Ultra (512 GB)
-
63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GB10 (128 GB)
-
63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X (6144-core GPU) (128 GB)
-
63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Max (128 GB)
-
63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
Quick answers
How much memory does MiniMax M2.1 (230B-A10B) need on the M2 Ultra 192GB?
At Q3_K_M it needs about 126 GB. The M2 Ultra 192GB has 144 GB usable.
How fast is MiniMax M2.1 (230B-A10B) on the M2 Ultra 192GB?
About 80.7 tok/s at Q3_K_M, an estimate from the hardware’s memory bandwidth and the size of the model.
Which quantization of MiniMax M2.1 (230B-A10B) should I use on the M2 Ultra 192GB?
Q3_K_M. Of the versions that fit, it is the one that runs best; when two run equally well, the check prefers the higher-rated one.
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.