Mistral Small 3.1 24B on Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) (32 GB)
Can the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) (32 GB) run Mistral Small 3.1 24B?
Yes, but slowly (tight fit)
Slow (tight fit). At Q4_K_M it needs about 18.0 GB of 18.2 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 4.0 tok/s.
- Best quant
Q4_K_M- Generation speed
- 4.0 tok/s
- Prompt processing
- 211 tok/s
- First token (1K prompt)
- 4.9 s
- Largest safe context
- 9K
Best app to run it on the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) (32 GB)
On Windows
- Supports Intel Arc through SYCL and Vulkan.
- Usually the first to support new model architectures.
llama-server -hf ggml-org/Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503-GGUF:Q4_K_MOn Linux
- Supports Intel Arc through SYCL and Vulkan.
- Usually the first to support new model architectures.
llama-server -hf ggml-org/Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503-GGUF:Q4_K_MDownload Mistral Small 3.1 24B
Recommended for the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) (32 GB): Q4_K_M. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.
Quickest · Ollama
One command downloads a ready-to-run version and starts a chat.
ollama run mistral-small3.1:24b-instruct-2503-q4_K_MQuantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
huggingface.co/ggml-org/Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503-GGUF (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/ggml-org/Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503-GGUFOriginal weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from Mistral AI, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
huggingface.co/mistralai/Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503 (opens in a new tab)
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Mistral AI. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/mistralai/mistral-inference (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/mistralai/mistral-inferenceHow it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 28.2 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 24.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 4.7 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Match score | 72.0 / 100 |
Every quantization on the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) (32 GB)
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 13.0 GB | 18.2 GB | 6.6 tok/s | Slow | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (IQ2_M) (opens in a new tab) |
Q3_K_M | 15.2 GB | 18.2 GB | 5.2 tok/s | Slow | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 18.0 GB | 18.2 GB | 4.0 tok/s | Slowtight fit | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | |
Q5_K_M | 20.4 GB | 18.2 GB | 2.8 tok/s | Very slowfar over GPU memory limit | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 23.1 GB | 18.2 GB | — | Won't run | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 28.8 GB | 18.2 GB | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | |
F16 | 51.4 GB | 18.2 GB | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Other hardware that runs it
-
65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
-
64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
-
64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
-
62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
-
55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
-
55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
Quick answers
How much memory does Mistral Small 3.1 24B need on the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) 32GB?
At Q4_K_M it needs about 18.0 GB. The Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) 32GB has 18.2 GB usable.
How fast is Mistral Small 3.1 24B on the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) 32GB?
About 4.0 tok/s at Q4_K_M, an estimate from the hardware’s memory bandwidth and the size of the model.
Which quantization of Mistral Small 3.1 24B should I use on the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) 32GB?
Q4_K_M. Of the versions that fit, it is the one that runs best; when two run equally well, the check prefers the higher-rated one.
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.