Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B on Intel Arc Pro B70
Can the Intel Arc Pro B70 run Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B?
Yes, it runs great
Runs great. At Q5_K_M it needs about 24.7 GB of 32.0 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 91.5 tok/s.
- Best quant
Q5_K_M- Generation speed
- 91.5 tok/s
- Prompt processing
- 5,877 tok/s
- First token (1K prompt)
- 0.3 s
- Largest safe context
- 256K
Best app to run it on the Intel Arc Pro B70
On Windows
- Supports Intel Arc through SYCL and Vulkan.
- Usually the first to support new model architectures.
llama-server -hf ggml-org/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-GGUF:Q5_K_MOn Linux
- Supports Intel Arc through SYCL and Vulkan.
- Usually the first to support new model architectures.
llama-server -hf ggml-org/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-GGUF:Q5_K_MDownload Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B
Quickest · Ollama
One command downloads a ready-to-run version and starts a chat.
ollama run nemotron-3-nano:30bQuantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
huggingface.co/ggml-org/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-GGUF (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/ggml-org/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-GGUFOriginal weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from NVIDIA, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 (opens in a new tab)
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from NVIDIA. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/NVIDIA-NeMo/Nemotron (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/NVIDIA-NeMo/NemotronHow it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 33.6 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 25.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Match score | 88.6 / 100 |
Every quantization on the Intel Arc Pro B70
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 14.9 GB | 32.0 GB | 146 tok/s | Runs great | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q3_K_M | 17.7 GB | 32.0 GB | 125 tok/s | Runs great | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 21.5 GB | 32.0 GB | 105 tok/s | Runs great | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 24.7 GB | 32.0 GB | 91.5 tok/s | Runs great | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 28.1 GB | 32.0 GB | 80.3 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 35.7 GB | 32.0 GB | 41.9 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 65.4 GB | 32.0 GB | — | Won't run | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Other hardware that runs it
-
77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M1 Max (64 GB)
-
77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Max (64 GB)
-
77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
-
76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Pro (48 GB)
-
74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
-
73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Quick answers
How much memory does Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B need on the Arc Pro B70 32GB?
At Q5_K_M it needs about 24.7 GB. The Arc Pro B70 32GB has 32.0 GB usable.
How fast is Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B on the Arc Pro B70 32GB?
About 91.5 tok/s at Q5_K_M, an estimate from the hardware’s memory bandwidth and the size of the model.
Which quantization of Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B should I use on the Arc Pro B70 32GB?
Q5_K_M. Of the versions that fit, it is the one that runs best; when two run equally well, the check prefers the higher-rated one.
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.