Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B on Intel Core i3-1215U / i3-1315U NAS (96 GB)
Can the Intel Core i3-1215U / i3-1315U NAS (96 GB) run Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B?
Yes, it runs well
Runs well. At Q4_K_M it needs about 26.6 GB of 83.5 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 10.8 tok/s.
- Best quant
Q4_K_M- Generation speed
- 10.8 tok/s
- Prompt processing
- 42.9 tok/s
- First token (1K prompt)
- 23.9 s
- Largest safe context
- 256K
Best app to run it on the Intel Core i3-1215U / i3-1315U NAS (96 GB)
On Linux
- One command with Ollama’s own build of this model.
- Serves an OpenAI-compatible API that other apps and coding tools can use.
ollama run nemotron-3-nano:30b-a3b-q4_K_MDownload Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B
Recommended for the Intel Core i3-1215U / i3-1315U NAS (96 GB): Q4_K_M. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.
Quickest · Ollama
One command downloads a ready-to-run version and starts a chat.
ollama run nemotron-3-nano:30b-a3b-q4_K_MQuantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
Download the Q4_K_M file (opens in a new tab)
huggingface.co/ggml-org/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-GGUF (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/ggml-org/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-GGUF:Q4_K_MOriginal weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from NVIDIA, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 (opens in a new tab)
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from NVIDIA. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/NVIDIA-NeMo/Nemotron (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/NVIDIA-NeMo/NemotronHow it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 32.9 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 25.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 7.8 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 7.3 / 15 | |
| Match score | 73.1 / 100 |
Every quantization on the Intel Core i3-1215U / i3-1315U NAS (96 GB)
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 20.0 GB | 83.5 GB | 17.4 tok/s | Runs well | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q3_K_M | 22.8 GB | 83.5 GB | 13.9 tok/s | Runs well | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 26.6 GB | 83.5 GB | 10.8 tok/s | Runs well | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 29.8 GB | 83.5 GB | 9.0 tok/s | Slow | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 33.2 GB | 83.5 GB | 7.6 tok/s | Slow | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 40.8 GB | 83.5 GB | 5.6 tok/s | Slow | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 70.5 GB | 83.5 GB | 2.6 tok/s | Very slow | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Other hardware that runs it
-
77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M1 Max (64 GB)
-
77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Max (64 GB)
-
77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
-
76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Pro (48 GB)
-
74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
-
73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Quick answers
How much memory does Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B need on the Intel Core i3-1215U / i3-1315U NAS 96GB?
At Q4_K_M it needs about 26.6 GB. The Intel Core i3-1215U / i3-1315U NAS 96GB has 83.5 GB usable.
How fast is Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B on the Intel Core i3-1215U / i3-1315U NAS 96GB?
About 10.8 tok/s at Q4_K_M, an estimate from the hardware’s memory bandwidth and the size of the model.
Which quantization of Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B should I use on the Intel Core i3-1215U / i3-1315U NAS 96GB?
Q4_K_M. Of the versions that fit, it is the one that runs best; when two run equally well, the check prefers the higher-rated one.
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.