Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B on Apple M1 Max (64 GB)
Can the Apple M1 Max (64 GB) run Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B?
Yes, it runs great
Runs great. At Q8_0 it needs about 38.0 GB of 48.0 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 56.4 tok/s.
- Best quant
Q8_0- Generation speed
- 56.4 tok/s
- Prompt processing
- 2,149 tok/s
- First token (1K prompt)
- 0.5 s
- Largest safe context
- 256K
Best app to run it on the Apple M1 Max (64 GB)
On macOS
- One command with Ollama’s own build of this model.
- Serves an OpenAI-compatible API that other apps and coding tools can use.
ollama run nemotron-3.5-lightning:30b-a3b-q8_0Download Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B
Recommended for the Apple M1 Max (64 GB): Q8_0. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.
Quickest · Ollama
One command downloads a ready-to-run version and starts a chat.
ollama run nemotron-3.5-lightning:30b-a3b-q8_0Quantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
Download the Q8_0 file (opens in a new tab)
huggingface.co/unsloth/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-GGUF (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/unsloth/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-GGUF:Q8_0Original weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from NVIDIA, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-BF16 (opens in a new tab)
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from NVIDIA. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/NVIDIA-NeMo/Nemotron (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/NVIDIA-NeMo/NemotronHow it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 32.4 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 25.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Match score | 87.4 / 100 |
Every quantization on the Apple M1 Max (64 GB)
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 17.1 GB | 48.0 GB | 134 tok/s | Runs great | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (IQ2_M) (opens in a new tab) |
Q3_K_M | 20.0 GB | 48.0 GB | 115 tok/s | Runs great | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (UD-Q3_K_XL) (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 23.8 GB | 48.0 GB | 95.6 tok/s | Runs great | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 26.9 GB | 48.0 GB | 82.7 tok/s | Runs great | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 30.4 GB | 48.0 GB | 72.3 tok/s | Runs great | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (UD-Q6_K_XL) (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 38.0 GB | 48.0 GB | 56.4 tok/s | Runs great | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 67.7 GB | 48.0 GB | — | Won't run | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Other hardware that runs it
-
72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Max (64 GB)
-
72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
-
71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Pro (48 GB)
-
69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
-
68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
-
68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Quick answers
How much memory does Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B need on the M1 Max 64GB?
At Q8_0 it needs about 38.0 GB. The M1 Max 64GB has 48.0 GB usable.
How fast is Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B on the M1 Max 64GB?
About 56.4 tok/s at Q8_0, an estimate from the hardware’s memory bandwidth and the size of the model.
Which quantization of Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B should I use on the M1 Max 64GB?
Q8_0. Of the versions that fit, it is the one that runs best; when two run equally well, the check prefers the higher-rated one.
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.