Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct on NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
Can the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell run Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?
Yes, it runs great
Runs great. At Q4_K_M it needs about 51.1 GB of 96.0 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 31.2 tok/s.
- Best quant
Q4_K_M- Generation speed
- 31.2 tok/s
- Prompt processing
- 1,276 tok/s
- First token (1K prompt)
- 0.8 s
- Largest safe context
- 128K
Best app to run it on the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
On Windows
- One command with Ollama’s own build of this model.
- Serves an OpenAI-compatible API that other apps and coding tools can use.
ollama run nemotron:70b-instruct-q4_K_MDownload Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Recommended for the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell: Q4_K_M. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.
Quickest · Ollama
One command downloads a ready-to-run version and starts a chat.
ollama run nemotron:70b-instruct-q4_K_MQuantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
Download the Q4_K_M file (opens in a new tab)
huggingface.co/lmstudio-community/Llama-3.1-Nemotron-70B-Instruct-HF-GGUF (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/lmstudio-community/Llama-3.1-Nemotron-70B-Instruct-HF-GGUF:Q4_K_MOriginal weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from NVIDIA, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
huggingface.co/nvidia/Llama-3.1-Nemotron-70B-Instruct-HF (opens in a new tab)
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from NVIDIA. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/NVIDIA-NeMo/Nemotron (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/NVIDIA-NeMo/NemotronHow it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 28.2 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 25.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 13.2 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 12.3 / 15 | |
| Match score | 78.7 / 100 |
Every quantization on the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 36.3 GB | 96.0 GB | 51.2 tok/s | Runs great | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | |
Q3_K_M | 42.7 GB | 96.0 GB | 40.3 tok/s | Runs great | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (Q3_K_L) (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 51.1 GB | 96.0 GB | 31.2 tok/s | Runs great | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 58.2 GB | 96.0 GB | 25.8 tok/s | Runs well | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | |
Q6_K | 65.9 GB | 96.0 GB | 21.6 tok/s | Runs well | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · part 1 of 2 (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 82.9 GB | 96.0 GB | 15.9 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · part 1 of 2 (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 149 GB | 96.0 GB | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Other hardware that runs it
-
55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Max (64 GB)
-
62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M2 Ultra (192 GB)
-
62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M3 Ultra (256 GB)
-
55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Max (128 GB)
-
62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M3 Ultra (512 GB)
-
46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
Quick answers
How much memory does Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct need on the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 96GB?
At Q4_K_M it needs about 51.1 GB. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 96GB has 96.0 GB usable.
How fast is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct on the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 96GB?
About 31.2 tok/s at Q4_K_M, an estimate from the hardware’s memory bandwidth and the size of the model.
Which quantization of Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct should I use on the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 96GB?
Q4_K_M. Of the versions that fit, it is the one that runs best; when two run equally well, the check prefers the higher-rated one.
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.