on

Can the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 NAS (192 GB) run Llama 3.1 Nemotron Safety Guard 8B v3?

83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.

Yes, it runs well

Runs well. At Q6_K it needs about 20.2 GB of 159 GB usable and makes one decision in about 353 ms.

Best quant
Q6_K
Time per decision
353 ms
Decisions per second
2.8/s
Input assumed
512 tokens
Returns
Fixed labels

Best app to run it on the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 NAS (192 GB)

On Linux

llama.cpp

Command line + local API · runs on llama.cpp

  • Usually the first to support new model architectures.
llama-server -hf mradermacher/Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Safety-Guard-8B-v3-GGUF:Q6_K
  • Ollama Runs the Hugging Face GGUF with ollama run hf.co/…
  • LocalAI One OpenAI-compatible server for GGUF guard models and rerankers together.

How we choose: the files published for this model, which apps run in a container on a NAS without a graphics card (models run on its processor), and whether the model fits fully in the memory models can use. Details.

Download Llama 3.1 Nemotron Safety Guard 8B v3

Recommended for the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 NAS (192 GB): Q6_K. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.

Quantized files · GGUF

Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.

Download the Q6_K file (opens in a new tab)

huggingface.co/mradermacher/Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Safety-Guard-8B-v3-GGUF (opens in a new tab)

ollama run hf.co/mradermacher/Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Safety-Guard-8B-v3-GGUF:Q6_K

Original weights · Hugging Face

Full-precision files from NVIDIA, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.

huggingface.co/nvidia/Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Safety-Guard-8B-v3 (opens in a new tab)

No sign-in needed.

Links checked 3 days ago against Hugging Face, Ollama and GitHub.

How it’s rated

Quality 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
How capable the model itself is at Q6_K, from its editorial quality tier scaled by the quantization or precision. It’s the same on any hardware that runs this variant. Scale: A+ 85+ · A 70+ · B 55+ · C 40+ · D under 40.
Runs Runs well
How well it runs on the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 NAS (192 GB): speed, capped by how well it fits in memory. Runs great: 30+ tokens/s (or near the image, video or decision speed target) · Runs well: 10+ tokens/s · Slow: 3+ tokens/s · Very slow: under 3 · Won’t run: doesn’t fit even with offload. A tight fit or RAM offload caps it at Runs well; heavy offload caps it at Slow.

Match score

To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.

PrecisionEditorial precision tier from the model’s published benchmarks, scaled by the quantization or precision used.37.4 / 45
Memory fitFull marks when the model fits in the share of the NAS’s memory that models can use (the rest stays with the NAS system and its storage services); fewer when it goes past that limit.25.0 / 25
SpeedTime for one decision against a 100 ms target: reading the input plus any tokens the model writes.8.0 / 15
ClarityHow easy the answer is to use in code: a probability or score earns the most, written feedback before a score the least.12.0 / 15
Match score82.4 / 100

The match score orders results; it is not shown as a grade. Quality and Runs are the two ratings in the tables.

Every quantization on the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 NAS (192 GB)

Quant Memory needed Available Speed Runs Quality Download
Q4_K_M 18.5 GB 159 GB 279 ms Runs well 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GGUF (opens in a new tab)
Q5_K_M 19.3 GB 159 GB 314 ms Runs well 81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GGUF (opens in a new tab)
Q6_K 20.2 GB 159 GB 353 ms Runs well 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GGUF (opens in a new tab)
Q8_0 22.1 GB 159 GB 440 ms Slow 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GGUF (opens in a new tab)
F16 29.7 GB 159 GB 824 ms Slow 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GGUF (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab)

Times are for one request with a 512-token input and about 6 tokens written. Batching servers process many requests at once.

Other hardware that runs it

Quick answers

How much memory does Llama 3.1 Nemotron Safety Guard 8B v3 need on the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 NAS 192GB?

At Q6_K it needs about 20.2 GB. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 NAS 192GB has 159 GB usable.

How fast is Llama 3.1 Nemotron Safety Guard 8B v3 on the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 NAS 192GB?

It makes one decision in about 353 ms at Q6_K, an estimate from the hardware and the size of the model.

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.

Was this page helpful?