Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct on Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) (32 GB)
Can the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) (32 GB) run Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct?
Yes, but slowly (tight fit)
Slow (tight fit). At Q2_K it needs about 15.7 GB of 18.2 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 4.9 tok/s.
- Best quant
Q2_K- Generation speed
- 4.9 tok/s
- Prompt processing
- 157 tok/s
- First token (1K prompt)
- 6.5 s
- Largest safe context
- 35K
Best app to run it on the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) (32 GB)
On Windows
- Supports Intel Arc through SYCL and Vulkan.
- Usually the first to support new model architectures.
llama-server -hf unsloth/Olmo-3.1-32B-Instruct-GGUF:Q2_KDownload Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct
Recommended for the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) (32 GB): Q2_K. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.
Quickest · Ollama
One command downloads a ready-to-run version and starts a chat.
ollama run olmo-3.1:32b-instructQuantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
Download the Q2_K file (opens in a new tab)
huggingface.co/unsloth/Olmo-3.1-32B-Instruct-GGUF (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/unsloth/Olmo-3.1-32B-Instruct-GGUF:Q2_KOriginal weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from Ai2, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
huggingface.co/allenai/Olmo-3.1-32B-Instruct (opens in a new tab)
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Ai2. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/allenai/OLMo (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/allenai/OLMoHow it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 22.7 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 24.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 5.2 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Match score | 66.9 / 100 |
Every quantization on the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) (32 GB)
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 15.7 GB | 18.2 GB | 4.9 tok/s | Slowtight fit | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q3_K_M | 18.6 GB | 18.2 GB | 3.3 tok/s | Slowover GPU memory limit | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 22.5 GB | 18.2 GB | 2.5 tok/s | Very slowfar over GPU memory limit | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 25.7 GB | 18.2 GB | — | Won't run | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 29.2 GB | 18.2 GB | — | Won't run | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 37.0 GB | 18.2 GB | — | Won't run | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 67.3 GB | 18.2 GB | — | Won't run | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Other hardware that runs it
-
69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
-
68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
-
68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
-
68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
-
71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
-
68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Max (64 GB)
Quick answers
How much memory does Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct need on the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) 32GB?
At Q2_K it needs about 15.7 GB. The Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) 32GB has 18.2 GB usable.
How fast is Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct on the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) 32GB?
About 4.9 tok/s at Q2_K, an estimate from the hardware’s memory bandwidth and the size of the model.
Which quantization of Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct should I use on the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) 32GB?
Q2_K. Of the versions that fit, it is the one that runs best; when two run equally well, the check prefers the higher-rated one.
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.