Olmo 3.1 32B Think on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
Can the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 run Olmo 3.1 32B Think?
Yes, it runs great
Runs great. At Q5_K_M it needs about 25.8 GB of 32.0 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 56.4 tok/s.
- Best quant
Q5_K_M- Generation speed
- 56.4 tok/s
- Prompt processing
- 2,341 tok/s
- First token (1K prompt)
- 0.4 s
- Largest safe context
- 64K
Best app to run it on the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
On Windows
- One command with Ollama’s own build of this model.
- Serves an OpenAI-compatible API that other apps and coding tools can use.
ollama run olmo-3.1:32b-thinkOn Linux
- One command with Ollama’s own build of this model.
- Serves an OpenAI-compatible API that other apps and coding tools can use.
ollama run olmo-3.1:32b-thinkDownload Olmo 3.1 32B Think
Recommended for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090: Q5_K_M. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.
Quickest · Ollama
One command downloads a ready-to-run version and starts a chat.
ollama run olmo-3.1:32b-thinkQuantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
Download the Q5_K_M file (opens in a new tab)
huggingface.co/unsloth/Olmo-3.1-32B-Think-GGUF (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/unsloth/Olmo-3.1-32B-Think-GGUF:Q5_K_MOriginal weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from Ai2, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
huggingface.co/allenai/Olmo-3.1-32B-Think (opens in a new tab)
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Ai2. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/allenai/OLMo (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/allenai/OLMoHow it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 33.2 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 25.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Match score | 88.2 / 100 |
Every quantization on the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 15.8 GB | 32.0 GB | 112 tok/s | Runs great | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q3_K_M | 18.7 GB | 32.0 GB | 88.2 tok/s | Runs great | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 22.6 GB | 32.0 GB | 68.3 tok/s | Runs great | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 25.8 GB | 32.0 GB | 56.4 tok/s | Runs great | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 29.4 GB | 32.0 GB | 47.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 37.1 GB | 32.0 GB | 7.1 tok/s | Slowoffloads to RAM | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 67.4 GB | 32.0 GB | — | Won't run | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Other hardware that runs it
-
72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
-
72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
-
72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
-
75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
-
72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Max (64 GB)
-
72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M1 Max (64 GB)
Quick answers
How much memory does Olmo 3.1 32B Think need on the RTX 5090 32GB?
At Q5_K_M it needs about 25.8 GB. The RTX 5090 32GB has 32.0 GB usable.
How fast is Olmo 3.1 32B Think on the RTX 5090 32GB?
About 56.4 tok/s at Q5_K_M, an estimate from the hardware’s memory bandwidth and the size of the model.
Which quantization of Olmo 3.1 32B Think should I use on the RTX 5090 32GB?
Q5_K_M. Of the versions that fit, it is the one that runs best; when two run equally well, the check prefers the higher-rated one.
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.