on

Can the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 NAS (192 GB) run QVQ 72B Preview?

65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.

Yes, but slowly

Slow. At Q5_K_M it needs about 68.2 GB of 159 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 3.2 tok/s.

Best quant
Q5_K_M
Generation speed
3.2 tok/s
Prompt processing
519 tok/s
First token (1K prompt)
2.0 s
Largest safe context
32K

Best app to run it on the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 NAS (192 GB)

On Linux

llama.cpp

Command line + local API · runs on llama.cpp

  • Usually the first to support new model architectures.
llama-server -hf bartowski/QVQ-72B-Preview-GGUF:Q5_K_M

How we choose: the files published for this model, which apps run in a container on a NAS without a graphics card (models run on its processor), and whether the model fits fully in the memory models can use. Details.

Download QVQ 72B Preview

Recommended for the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 NAS (192 GB): Q5_K_M. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.

Quantized files · GGUF

Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.

Download the Q5_K_M files (opens in a new tab)

huggingface.co/bartowski/QVQ-72B-Preview-GGUF (opens in a new tab)

ollama run hf.co/bartowski/QVQ-72B-Preview-GGUF

Original weights · Hugging Face

Full-precision files from Alibaba, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.

huggingface.co/Qwen/QVQ-72B-Preview (opens in a new tab)

No sign-in needed.

Links checked 3 days ago against Hugging Face, Ollama and GitHub.

How it’s rated

Quality 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
How capable the model itself is at Q5_K_M, from its editorial quality tier scaled by the quantization or precision. It’s the same on any hardware that runs this variant. Scale: A+ 85+ · A 70+ · B 55+ · C 40+ · D under 40.
Runs Slow
How well it runs on the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 NAS (192 GB): speed, capped by how well it fits in memory. Runs great: 30+ tokens/s (or near the image, video or decision speed target) · Runs well: 10+ tokens/s · Slow: 3+ tokens/s · Very slow: under 3 · Won’t run: doesn’t fit even with offload. A tight fit or RAM offload caps it at Runs well; heavy offload caps it at Slow.

Match score

To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.

Model qualityEditorial quality tier of the model, scaled by the quantization or precision used.29.7 / 45
Memory fitFull marks when the model fits in the share of the NAS’s memory that models can use (the rest stays with the NAS system and its storage services); fewer when it goes past that limit.25.0 / 25
SpeedGeneration speed against a 40 tokens/s target for LLMs, or render time against a target for image and video.4.3 / 15
Memory useRewards using the memory you have, so a bigger, better variant beats a tiny one that leaves most memory idle.9.9 / 15
Match score68.8 / 100

The match score orders results; it is not shown as a grade. Quality and Runs are the two ratings in the tables.

Every quantization on the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 NAS (192 GB)

Quant Memory needed Available Speed Runs Quality Download
Q2_K 45.4 GB 159 GB 6.5 tok/s Slow 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GGUF (opens in a new tab)
Q3_K_M 52.0 GB 159 GB 5.1 tok/s Slow 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GGUF (opens in a new tab)
Q4_K_M 60.8 GB 159 GB 3.9 tok/s Slow 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GGUF (opens in a new tab)
Q5_K_M 68.2 GB 159 GB 3.2 tok/s Slow 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab)
Q6_K 76.2 GB 159 GB 2.7 tok/s Very slow 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab)
Q8_0 93.8 GB 159 GB 2.0 tok/s Very slow 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab)
F16 163 GB 159 GB 0.8 tok/s Very slowover GPU memory limit 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Original weights (opens in a new tab)

Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.

Other hardware that runs it

Quick answers

How much memory does QVQ 72B Preview need on the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 NAS 192GB?

At Q5_K_M it needs about 68.2 GB. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 NAS 192GB has 159 GB usable.

How fast is QVQ 72B Preview on the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 NAS 192GB?

About 3.2 tok/s at Q5_K_M, an estimate from the hardware’s memory bandwidth and the size of the model.

Which quantization of QVQ 72B Preview should I use on the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 NAS 192GB?

Q5_K_M. Of the versions that fit, it is the one that runs best; when two run equally well, the check prefers the higher-rated one.

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.

Was this page helpful?