Qwen2.5 72B Instruct on NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Can the NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation run Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?
Yes, it runs well (tight fit)
Runs well (tight fit). At Q3_K_M it needs about 41.3 GB of 48.0 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 21.0 tok/s.
- Best quant
Q3_K_M- Generation speed
- 21.0 tok/s
- Prompt processing
- 902 tok/s
- First token (1K prompt)
- 1.1 s
- Largest safe context
- 27K
Best app to run it on the NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
On Windows
- One command with Ollama’s own build of this model.
- Serves an OpenAI-compatible API that other apps and coding tools can use.
ollama run qwen2.5:72b-instruct-q3_K_MDownload Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Recommended for the NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation: Q3_K_M. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.
Quickest · Ollama
One command downloads a ready-to-run version and starts a chat.
ollama run qwen2.5:72b-instruct-q3_K_MQuantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
Download the Q3_K_M file (opens in a new tab)
huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct-GGUF (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/Qwen/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct-GGUF:Q3_K_MOriginal weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from Alibaba, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct (opens in a new tab)
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Alibaba. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/QwenLM/Qwen3 (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/QwenLM/Qwen3How it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 27.6 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 24.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 10.9 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Match score | 77.5 / 100 |
Every quantization on the NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 34.8 GB | 48.0 GB | 26.6 tok/s | Runs well | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · part 1 of 7 (opens in a new tab) |
Q3_K_M | 41.3 GB | 48.0 GB | 21.0 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · part 1 of 9 (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 50.0 GB | 48.0 GB | 10.0 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · part 1 of 12 (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 57.3 GB | 48.0 GB | 3.9 tok/s | Slowoffloads to RAM | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · part 1 of 14 (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 65.3 GB | 48.0 GB | 2.3 tok/s | Very slowoffloads to RAM | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · part 1 of 16 (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 82.7 GB | 48.0 GB | — | Won't run | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · part 1 of 21 (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 151 GB | 48.0 GB | — | Won't run | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · part 1 of 42 (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Other hardware that runs it
-
69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
-
61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Max (64 GB)
-
69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M2 Ultra (192 GB)
-
69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M3 Ultra (256 GB)
-
61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Max (128 GB)
-
69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M3 Ultra (512 GB)
Quick answers
How much memory does Qwen2.5 72B Instruct need on the NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 48GB?
At Q3_K_M it needs about 41.3 GB. The NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 48GB has 48.0 GB usable.
How fast is Qwen2.5 72B Instruct on the NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 48GB?
About 21.0 tok/s at Q3_K_M, an estimate from the hardware’s memory bandwidth and the size of the model.
Which quantization of Qwen2.5 72B Instruct should I use on the NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 48GB?
Q3_K_M. Of the versions that fit, it is the one that runs best; when two run equally well, the check prefers the higher-rated one.
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.