Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct on Rockchip RK3588 / RK3588S (24 GB)
Can the Rockchip RK3588 / RK3588S (24 GB) run Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
Barely: it runs very slowly (tight fit)
Very slow (tight fit). At Q3_K_M it needs about 20.5 GB of 21.1 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 1.4 tok/s.
- Best quant
Q3_K_M- Generation speed
- 1.4 tok/s
- Prompt processing
- 3.7 tok/s
- First token (1K prompt)
- 279.9 s
- Largest safe context
- 10K
Best app to run it on the Rockchip RK3588 / RK3588S (24 GB)
On Linux on ARM boards
- One command with Ollama’s own build of this model.
- Serves an OpenAI-compatible API that other apps and coding tools can use.
ollama run qwen2.5-coder:32b-instruct-q3_K_MDownload Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Recommended for the Rockchip RK3588 / RK3588S (24 GB): Q3_K_M. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.
Quickest · Ollama
One command downloads a ready-to-run version and starts a chat.
ollama run qwen2.5-coder:32b-instruct-q3_K_MQuantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
Download the Q3_K_M file (opens in a new tab)
huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct-GGUF (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct-GGUF:Q3_K_MOriginal weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from Alibaba, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct (opens in a new tab)
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Alibaba. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/QwenLM/Qwen3-Coder (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/QwenLM/Qwen3-CoderHow it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 25.3 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 24.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 2.8 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Match score | 67.1 / 100 |
Every quantization on the Rockchip RK3588 / RK3588S (24 GB)
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 17.6 GB | 21.1 GB | 1.7 tok/s | Very slow | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q3_K_M | 20.5 GB | 21.1 GB | 1.4 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 24.4 GB | 21.1 GB | — | Won't run | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 27.7 GB | 21.1 GB | — | Won't run | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 31.3 GB | 21.1 GB | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 39.2 GB | 21.1 GB | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 70.0 GB | 21.1 GB | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · part 1 of 9 (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Other hardware that runs it
-
66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
-
63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
-
63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
-
63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
-
66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
-
63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Max (64 GB)
Quick answers
How much memory does Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct need on the Rockchip RK3588 / RK3588S 24GB?
At Q3_K_M it needs about 20.5 GB. The Rockchip RK3588 / RK3588S 24GB has 21.1 GB usable.
How fast is Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct on the Rockchip RK3588 / RK3588S 24GB?
About 1.4 tok/s at Q3_K_M, an estimate from the hardware’s memory bandwidth and the size of the model.
Which quantization of Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct should I use on the Rockchip RK3588 / RK3588S 24GB?
Q3_K_M. Of the versions that fit, it is the one that runs best; when two run equally well, the check prefers the higher-rated one.
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.