Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507 on AMD Radeon PRO W7800 32GB
Can the AMD Radeon PRO W7800 32GB run Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507?
Yes, it runs great
Runs great. At Q5_K_M it needs about 24.7 GB of 32.0 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 99.4 tok/s.
- Best quant
Q5_K_M- Generation speed
- 99.4 tok/s
- Prompt processing
- 16,984 tok/s
- First token (1K prompt)
- 0.3 s
- Largest safe context
- 80K
Best app to run it on the AMD Radeon PRO W7800 32GB
On Windows
- AMD’s own app: llama.cpp tuned for Radeon on Vulkan and ROCm.
lemonade pull unsloth/Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507-GGUF:Q5_K_MOn Linux
- AMD’s own app: llama.cpp tuned for Radeon on Vulkan and ROCm.
lemonade pull unsloth/Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507-GGUF:Q5_K_MDownload Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507
Recommended for the AMD Radeon PRO W7800 32GB: Q5_K_M. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.
Quickest · Ollama
One command downloads a ready-to-run version and starts a chat.
ollama run qwen3:30b-thinkingQuantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
Download the Q5_K_M file (opens in a new tab)
huggingface.co/unsloth/Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507-GGUF (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/unsloth/Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507-GGUF:Q5_K_MOriginal weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from Alibaba, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507 (opens in a new tab)
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Alibaba. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/QwenLM/Qwen3 (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/QwenLM/Qwen3How it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 34.0 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 25.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Match score | 89.0 / 100 |
Every quantization on the AMD Radeon PRO W7800 32GB
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 15.2 GB | 32.0 GB | 156 tok/s | Runs great | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q3_K_M | 18.0 GB | 32.0 GB | 135 tok/s | Runs great | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 21.6 GB | 32.0 GB | 114 tok/s | Runs great | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 24.7 GB | 32.0 GB | 99.4 tok/s | Runs great | 75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 28.0 GB | 32.0 GB | 87.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 35.4 GB | 32.0 GB | 46.3 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 64.1 GB | 32.0 GB | — | Won't run | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Other hardware that runs it
-
78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M1 Max (64 GB)
-
78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Max (64 GB)
-
78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
-
77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Pro (48 GB)
-
75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
-
74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Quick answers
How much memory does Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507 need on the PRO W7800 32GB?
At Q5_K_M it needs about 24.7 GB. The PRO W7800 32GB has 32.0 GB usable.
How fast is Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507 on the PRO W7800 32GB?
About 99.4 tok/s at Q5_K_M, an estimate from the hardware’s memory bandwidth and the size of the model.
Which quantization of Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507 should I use on the PRO W7800 32GB?
Q5_K_M. Of the versions that fit, it is the one that runs best; when two run equally well, the check prefers the higher-rated one.
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.