Qwen3 Coder Next (80B-A3B) on AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS / Ryzen 7 255 NAS (64 GB)
Can the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS / Ryzen 7 255 NAS (64 GB) run Qwen3 Coder Next (80B-A3B)?
Yes, but slowly (far over GPU memory limit)
Slow (far over GPU memory limit). At Q2_K it needs about 35.2 GB of 32.0 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 47.0 tok/s.
- Best quant
Q2_K- Generation speed
- 47.0 tok/s
- Prompt processing
- 4,427 tok/s
- First token (1K prompt)
- 0.3 s
- Largest safe context
- —
Best app to run it on the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS / Ryzen 7 255 NAS (64 GB)
On Linux
- Splits the model between GPU memory and system RAM, which this setup needs.
- One command with Ollama’s own build of this model.
- Serves an OpenAI-compatible API that other apps and coding tools can use.
ollama run qwen3-coder-nextDownload Qwen3 Coder Next (80B-A3B)
Quickest · Ollama
One command downloads a ready-to-run version and starts a chat.
ollama run qwen3-coder-nextQuantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3-Coder-Next-GGUF (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/Qwen/Qwen3-Coder-Next-GGUFOriginal weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from Alibaba, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Alibaba. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/QwenLM/Qwen3-Coder (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/QwenLM/Qwen3-CoderHow it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 27.1 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 4.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Match score | 61.1 / 100 |
Every quantization on the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS / Ryzen 7 255 NAS (64 GB)
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 35.2 GB | 32.0 GB | 47.0 tok/s | Slowfar over GPU memory limit | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q3_K_M | 42.4 GB | 32.0 GB | — | Won't run | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 52.0 GB | 32.0 GB | — | Won't run | 81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 59.9 GB | 32.0 GB | — | Won't run | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 68.7 GB | 32.0 GB | — | Won't run | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 87.8 GB | 32.0 GB | — | Won't run | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 163 GB | 32.0 GB | — | Won't run | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Other hardware that runs it
-
86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M2 Ultra (192 GB)
-
86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GB10 (128 GB)
-
85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (128 GB)
-
85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Max (128 GB)
-
85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
-
85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X (6144-core GPU) (128 GB)
Quick answers
How much memory does Qwen3 Coder Next (80B-A3B) need on the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS / Ryzen 7 255 NAS 64GB?
At Q2_K it needs about 35.2 GB. The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS / Ryzen 7 255 NAS 64GB has 32.0 GB usable.
How fast is Qwen3 Coder Next (80B-A3B) on the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS / Ryzen 7 255 NAS 64GB?
About 47.0 tok/s at Q2_K, an estimate from the hardware’s memory bandwidth and the size of the model.
Which quantization of Qwen3 Coder Next (80B-A3B) should I use on the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS / Ryzen 7 255 NAS 64GB?
Q2_K. Of the versions that fit, it is the one that runs best; when two run equally well, the check prefers the higher-rated one.
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.