Qwen3 Coder Next (80B-A3B) on AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (64 GB)
Can the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (64 GB) run Qwen3 Coder Next (80B-A3B)?
Yes, it runs well (tight fit)
Runs well (tight fit). At Q3_K_M it needs about 43.7 GB of 48.0 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 84.6 tok/s.
- Best quant
Q3_K_M- Generation speed
- 84.6 tok/s
- Prompt processing
- 9,486 tok/s
- First token (1K prompt)
- 0.3 s
- Largest safe context
- 179K
Best app to run it on the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (64 GB)
On Windows
- Built for Ryzen AI and Strix Halo, including NPU + iGPU modes on Windows.
lemonade pull Qwen/Qwen3-Coder-Next-GGUF:Q3_K_MOn Linux
- Built for Ryzen AI and Strix Halo, including NPU + iGPU modes on Windows.
lemonade pull Qwen/Qwen3-Coder-Next-GGUF:Q3_K_MDownload Qwen3 Coder Next (80B-A3B)
Quickest · Ollama
One command downloads a ready-to-run version and starts a chat.
ollama run qwen3-coder-nextQuantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3-Coder-Next-GGUF (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/Qwen/Qwen3-Coder-Next-GGUFOriginal weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from Alibaba, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Alibaba. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/QwenLM/Qwen3-Coder (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/QwenLM/Qwen3-CoderHow it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 32.5 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 24.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Match score | 86.5 / 100 |
Every quantization on the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (64 GB)
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 36.5 GB | 48.0 GB | 101 tok/s | Runs great | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q3_K_M | 43.7 GB | 48.0 GB | 84.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 53.2 GB | 48.0 GB | 58.8 tok/s | Slowfar over GPU memory limit | 81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 61.2 GB | 48.0 GB | — | Won't run | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 70.0 GB | 48.0 GB | — | Won't run | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 89.1 GB | 48.0 GB | — | Won't run | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 164 GB | 48.0 GB | — | Won't run | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Other hardware that runs it
-
86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M2 Ultra (192 GB)
-
86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GB10 (128 GB)
-
85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (128 GB)
-
85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Max (128 GB)
-
85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
-
85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X (6144-core GPU) (128 GB)
Quick answers
How much memory does Qwen3 Coder Next (80B-A3B) need on the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 64GB?
At Q3_K_M it needs about 43.7 GB. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 64GB has 48.0 GB usable.
How fast is Qwen3 Coder Next (80B-A3B) on the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 64GB?
About 84.6 tok/s at Q3_K_M, an estimate from the hardware’s memory bandwidth and the size of the model.
Which quantization of Qwen3 Coder Next (80B-A3B) should I use on the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 64GB?
Q3_K_M. Of the versions that fit, it is the one that runs best; when two run equally well, the check prefers the higher-rated one.
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.