Qwen3.8 Flash Next (125B-A6B) on Intel Core Ultra 5 225 / 7 265 / 9 285 (desktop) NAS (192 GB)
Can the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 / 7 265 / 9 285 (desktop) NAS (192 GB) run Qwen3.8 Flash Next (125B-A6B)?
Yes, it runs well
Runs well. At Q5_K_M it needs about 142 GB of 173 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 12.1 tok/s.
- Best quant
Q5_K_M- Generation speed
- 12.1 tok/s
- Prompt processing
- 80.0 tok/s
- First token (1K prompt)
- 12.8 s
- Largest safe context
- 256K
Best app to run it on the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 / 7 265 / 9 285 (desktop) NAS (192 GB)
On Linux
- Usually the first to support new model architectures.
llama-server -hf unsloth/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GGUF:UD-Q5_K_XLDownload Qwen3.8 Flash Next (125B-A6B)
Recommended for the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 / 7 265 / 9 285 (desktop) NAS (192 GB): Q5_K_M. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.
Quantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
Download the Q5_K_M (UD-Q5_K_XL) files (opens in a new tab)
huggingface.co/unsloth/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GGUF (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/unsloth/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GGUFOriginal weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from Alibaba, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Alibaba. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/QwenLM/Qwen3.8 (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/QwenLM/Qwen3.8How it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 42.1 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 25.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 8.2 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Match score | 90.4 / 100 |
Every quantization on the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 / 7 265 / 9 285 (desktop) NAS (192 GB)
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 86.6 GB | 173 GB | 23.3 tok/s | Runs well | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (UD-Q2_K_XL) · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q3_K_M | 103 GB | 173 GB | 18.6 tok/s | Runs well | 81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (UD-Q3_K_XL) · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 124 GB | 173 GB | 14.5 tok/s | Runs well | 91Excellent quality (A+) · 91 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 142 GB | 173 GB | 12.1 tok/s | Runs well | 93Excellent quality (A+) · 93 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (UD-Q5_K_XL) · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 162 GB | 173 GB | 10.2 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 95Excellent quality (A+) · 95 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (UD-Q6_K_XL) · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 205 GB | 173 GB | — | Won't run | 96Excellent quality (A+) · 96 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 13/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 375 GB | 173 GB | — | Won't run | 96Excellent quality (A+) · 96 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 13/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Other hardware that runs it
-
93Excellent quality (A+) · 93 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 97/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M3 Ultra (256 GB)
-
96Excellent quality (A+) · 96 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 96/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M3 Ultra (512 GB)
-
91Excellent quality (A+) · 91 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 96/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M2 Ultra (192 GB)
-
81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GB10 (128 GB)
-
81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
-
81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X (6144-core GPU) (128 GB)
Quick answers
How much memory does Qwen3.8 Flash Next (125B-A6B) need on the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 / 7 265 / 9 285 (desktop) NAS 192GB?
At Q5_K_M it needs about 142 GB. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 / 7 265 / 9 285 (desktop) NAS 192GB has 173 GB usable.
How fast is Qwen3.8 Flash Next (125B-A6B) on the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 / 7 265 / 9 285 (desktop) NAS 192GB?
About 12.1 tok/s at Q5_K_M, an estimate from the hardware’s memory bandwidth and the size of the model.
Which quantization of Qwen3.8 Flash Next (125B-A6B) should I use on the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 / 7 265 / 9 285 (desktop) NAS 192GB?
Q5_K_M. Of the versions that fit, it is the one that runs best; when two run equally well, the check prefers the higher-rated one.
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.