Raon-1 mini Preview (30B-A4B) on UDOO BOLT V8 (16 GB)
Can the UDOO BOLT V8 (16 GB) run Raon-1 mini Preview (30B-A4B)?
No, it doesn’t fit
No. Raon-1 mini Preview (30B-A4B) needs about 12.8 GB even at Q2_K; the UDOO BOLT V8 (16 GB) has 8.0 GB usable.
Download Raon-1 mini Preview (30B-A4B)
Original weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from KRAFTON, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
huggingface.co/KRAFTON/Raon-1-mini-preview (opens in a new tab)
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from KRAFTON. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/krafton-ai/Raon-1-mini-preview (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/krafton-ai/Raon-1-mini-previewHow it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 8.3 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 0.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 0.0 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 0.0 / 15 | |
| Match score | 8.3 / 100 |
Every quantization on the UDOO BOLT V8 (16 GB)
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 12.8 GB | 8.0 GB | — | Won't run | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | All files (opens in a new tab) |
Q3_K_M | 15.4 GB | 8.0 GB | — | Won't run | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | All files (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 18.9 GB | 8.0 GB | — | Won't run | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | All files (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 21.7 GB | 8.0 GB | — | Won't run | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | All files (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 24.9 GB | 8.0 GB | — | Won't run | 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | All files (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 31.8 GB | 8.0 GB | — | Won't run | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | All files (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 58.9 GB | 8.0 GB | — | Won't run | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Hardware that can run it
-
88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 94/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M1 Max (64 GB)
-
88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 94/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Max (64 GB)
-
88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 94/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
-
87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 94/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
-
87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 94/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Pro (48 GB)
-
83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 92/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Models that do run on the UDOO BOLT V8 (16 GB)
- 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Ling 3.0 Tiny (8B-A1.3B)
- 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. K2 Horizon 7B
- 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. MiMo V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. SenseNova Loop 9B Preview
- 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Ornith 1.5 9B
Quick answers
How much memory does Raon-1 mini Preview (30B-A4B) need on the UDOO BOLT V8 16GB?
Even at Q2_K it needs about 12.8 GB; the UDOO BOLT V8 16GB has 8.0 GB usable.
What can the UDOO BOLT V8 16GB run instead?
Ling 3.0 Tiny (8B-A1.3B), K2 Horizon 7B and MiMo V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B run best on it; the page lists more, each with its speed.
What hardware can run Raon-1 mini Preview (30B-A4B)?
M1 Max 64GB, M4 Max 64GB and NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 96GB run it; the page lists more, each with its speed.
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.