on

Can the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) (32 GB) run Shieldstral 1.0 3B?

86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.

Yes, but slowly

Slow. At Q8_0 it needs about 6.4 GB of 18.2 GB usable and makes one decision in about 472 ms.

Best quant
Q8_0
Time per decision
472 ms
Decisions per second
2.1/s
Input assumed
512 tokens
Returns
Probability or score

Best app to run it on the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) (32 GB)

On Windows

Docker Model Runner

Command line + local API · runs on llama.cpp, vLLM

  • Handy if you already work in Docker.
docker model run hf.co/mistralai/Shieldstral-1.0-3B
  • vLLM For one person, llama.cpp-based apps are about as fast and use smaller GGUF files.
  • Sentence Transformers Can only use the CPU on this hardware, so it will be slow.

On Linux

Docker Model Runner

Command line + local API · runs on llama.cpp, vLLM

  • Handy if you already work in Docker.
docker model run hf.co/mistralai/Shieldstral-1.0-3B
  • vLLM For one person, llama.cpp-based apps are about as fast and use smaller GGUF files.
  • Sentence Transformers Can only use the CPU on this hardware, so it will be slow.

How we choose: the files published for this model, your operating system and GPU, whether it fits fully in memory, and published speed tests (MLX vs llama.cpp on Apple silicon, vLLM vs llama.cpp vs Ollama on NVIDIA). Details.

Download Shieldstral 1.0 3B

Original weights · Hugging Face

Full-precision files from Mistral AI, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.

huggingface.co/mistralai/Shieldstral-1.0-3B (opens in a new tab)

No sign-in needed.

Links checked 7 hours ago against Hugging Face, Ollama and GitHub.

How it’s rated

Quality 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
How capable the model itself is at Q8_0, from its editorial quality tier scaled by the quantization or precision. It’s the same on any hardware that runs this variant. Scale: A+ 85+ · A 70+ · B 55+ · C 40+ · D under 40.
Runs Slow
How well it runs on the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) (32 GB): speed, capped by how well it fits in memory. Runs great: 30+ tokens/s (or near the image, video or decision speed target) · Runs well: 10+ tokens/s · Slow: 3+ tokens/s · Very slow: under 3 · Won’t run: doesn’t fit even with offload. A tight fit or RAM offload caps it at Runs well; heavy offload caps it at Slow.

Match score

To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.

PrecisionEditorial precision tier from the model’s published benchmarks, scaled by the quantization or precision used.38.7 / 45
Memory fitFull marks when the model fits in the share of unified memory the GPU can use; fewer when it goes past that limit.25.0 / 25
SpeedTime for one decision against a 100 ms target: reading the input plus any tokens the model writes.6.9 / 15
ClarityHow easy the answer is to use in code: a probability or score earns the most, written feedback before a score the least.15.0 / 15
Match score85.6 / 100

The match score orders results; it is not shown as a grade. Quality and Runs are the two ratings in the tables.

Every quantization on the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) (32 GB)

Quant Memory needed Available Speed Runs Quality Download
Q4_K_M 4.6 GB 18.2 GB 434 ms Slow 81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. All files (opens in a new tab)
Q5_K_M 5.0 GB 18.2 GB 442 ms Slow 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. All files (opens in a new tab)
Q6_K 5.4 GB 18.2 GB 451 ms Slow 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. All files (opens in a new tab)
Q8_0 6.4 GB 18.2 GB 472 ms Slow 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. All files (opens in a new tab)
F16 10.0 GB 18.2 GB 564 ms Slow 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Original weights (opens in a new tab)

Times are for one request with a 512-token input and about 1 tokens written. Batching servers process many requests at once.

Other hardware that runs it

Quick answers

How much memory does Shieldstral 1.0 3B need on the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) 32GB?

At Q8_0 it needs about 6.4 GB. The Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) 32GB has 18.2 GB usable.

How fast is Shieldstral 1.0 3B on the Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arc 140T) 32GB?

It makes one decision in about 472 ms at Q8_0, an estimate from the hardware and the size of the model.

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.

Was this page helpful?