on

Can the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (32 GB) run TeleOCR?

40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.

Yes, it runs great

Runs great. At F16 it needs about 6.3 GB of 24.0 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 44.7 tok/s.

Best quant
F16
Generation speed
44.7 tok/s
Prompt processing
20,041 tok/s
First token (1K prompt)
0.3 s
Largest safe context
125K

Best app to run it on the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (32 GB)

On Windows

Docker Model Runner

Command line + local API · runs on llama.cpp, vLLM

  • Handy if you already work in Docker.
docker model run hf.co/XingChen-AGI/TeleOCR

On Linux

Docker Model Runner

Command line + local API · runs on llama.cpp, vLLM

  • Handy if you already work in Docker.
docker model run hf.co/XingChen-AGI/TeleOCR

How we choose: the files published for this model, your operating system and GPU, whether it fits fully in memory, and published speed tests (MLX vs llama.cpp on Apple silicon, vLLM vs llama.cpp vs Ollama on NVIDIA). Details.

Download TeleOCR

Original weights · Hugging Face

Full-precision files from XingChen-AGI, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.

huggingface.co/XingChen-AGI/TeleOCR (opens in a new tab)

No sign-in needed.

Official repo · GitHub

Reference code, inference scripts and docs from XingChen-AGI. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.

github.com/caipeng328/TeleOCR (opens in a new tab)

Official code for full document parsing; the model card points here. Formerly named NaviDC-OCR.

git clone https://github.com/caipeng328/TeleOCR

Links checked 6 days ago against Hugging Face, Ollama and GitHub.

How it’s rated

Quality 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
How capable the model itself is at F16, from its editorial quality tier scaled by the quantization or precision. It’s the same on any hardware that runs this variant. Scale: A+ 85+ · A 70+ · B 55+ · C 40+ · D under 40.
Runs Runs great
How well it runs on the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (32 GB): speed, capped by how well it fits in memory. Runs great: 30+ tokens/s (or near the image, video or decision speed target) · Runs well: 10+ tokens/s · Slow: 3+ tokens/s · Very slow: under 3 · Won’t run: doesn’t fit even with offload. A tight fit or RAM offload caps it at Runs well; heavy offload caps it at Slow.

Match score

To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.

Model qualityEditorial quality tier of the model, scaled by the quantization or precision used.18.0 / 45
Memory fitFull marks when the model fits in the share of unified memory the GPU can use; fewer when it goes past that limit.25.0 / 25
SpeedGeneration speed against a 40 tokens/s target for LLMs, or render time against a target for image and video.15.0 / 15
Memory useRewards using the memory you have, so a bigger, better variant beats a tiny one that leaves most memory idle.6.1 / 15
Match score64.1 / 100

The match score orders results; it is not shown as a grade. Quality and Runs are the two ratings in the tables.

Every quantization on the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (32 GB)

Quant Memory needed Available Speed Runs Quality Download
Q2_K 4.0 GB 24.0 GB 313 tok/s Runs great 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. All files (opens in a new tab)
Q3_K_M 4.2 GB 24.0 GB 246 tok/s Runs great 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. All files (opens in a new tab)
Q4_K_M 4.3 GB 24.0 GB 191 tok/s Runs great 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. All files (opens in a new tab)
Q5_K_M 4.5 GB 24.0 GB 157 tok/s Runs great 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. All files (opens in a new tab)
Q6_K 4.6 GB 24.0 GB 132 tok/s Runs great 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. All files (opens in a new tab)
Q8_0 5.0 GB 24.0 GB 97.0 tok/s Runs great 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. All files (opens in a new tab)
F16 6.3 GB 24.0 GB 44.7 tok/s Runs great 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Original weights (opens in a new tab)

Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.

Other hardware that runs it

Quick answers

How much memory does TeleOCR need on the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 32GB?

At F16 it needs about 6.3 GB. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 32GB has 24.0 GB usable.

How fast is TeleOCR on the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 32GB?

About 44.7 tok/s at F16, an estimate from the hardware’s memory bandwidth and the size of the model.

Which quantization of TeleOCR should I use on the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 32GB?

F16. Of the versions that fit, it is the one that runs best; when two run equally well, the check prefers the higher-rated one.

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.

Was this page helpful?