
Hardware · BeagleBoard
What AI models can the BeagleBone AI-64 (4 GB) run?
- RAM
- 4.0 GB
- Usable for models
- 2.8 GB
- Memory bandwidth
- 13 GB/s
- Runs models on
- CPU cores
- Released
- 2022
Models run on the CPU cores here, so the memory’s speed and how fast those cores can read it set the pace: small models (about 1-4B) are usable, bigger ones are slow. We plan around 2.8 GB of the 4.0 GB (what Linux leaves free for a model). C7x DSP with TI’s Matrix Multiply Accelerator: 8 TOPS (INT8) for vision models compiled with TI’s TIDL tools; llama.cpp doesn’t use it.
More about this hardware
| Maker | BeagleBoard |
|---|---|
| Type | Single-board computer or edge AI board |
| Share of memory for models | 70% (what Linux typically leaves free on a board this size) |
| Chip | TI TDA4VM |
| AI accelerator | C7x DSP with TI’s Matrix Multiply Accelerator: 8 TOPS (INT8) for vision models compiled with TI’s TIDL tools; llama.cpp doesn’t use it. |
| Boards with this chip | BeagleBone AI-64 |
| Memory type | 4 GB LPDDR4 |
| Bandwidth figure | 12.8 GB/s, estimated, see the note below |
| Note | 2× Cortex-A72 at 2 GHz plus six Cortex-R5F real-time cores. Built for vision and robot control; with only two CPU cores for LLMs, expect small models at a few tokens per second (estimate, assuming a 32-bit bus at 3200 MT/s). |
| Specifications | docs.beagleboard.org |
Apps that run models well on the BeagleBone AI-64 (4 GB)
Linux on ARM boards
1 product with the BeagleBone AI-64 (4 GB)
Best LLMs for the BeagleBone AI-64 (4 GB)
| Quality | Model | Quant | Memory | Speed | Runs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | MiniCPM5 2B | Q4_K_M | 2.7 GB | 1.7 tok/s | Very slowtight fit |
| 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | LFM3 1.7B | Q3_K_M | 1.8 GB | 3.3 tok/s | Slow |
| 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Spark-X2.6 4B | Q2_K | 2.8 GB | 1.7 tok/s | Very slowtight fit |
| 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | MiniCPM-OCR 1.0 1.3B | Q4_K_M | 1.7 GB | 3.4 tok/s | Slow |
| 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | TMax 4B | Q2_K | 2.8 GB | 1.7 tok/s | Very slowtight fit |
| 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Unlimited OCR 2 (3B-A0.6B) | Q2_K | 2.7 GB | 11.5 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | PaddleOCR-VL 1.6 0.9B | Q4_K_M | 1.6 GB | 4.5 tok/s | Slow |
| 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | LFM2.5 2.6B | Q4_K_M | 2.6 GB | 1.6 tok/s | Very slowtight fit |
| 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Jamba Reasoning 3B | Q4_K_M | 2.8 GB | 1.4 tok/s | Very slowtight fit |
| 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | TeleOCR | Q4_K_M | 2.6 GB | 3.1 tok/s | Slowtight fit |
| 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Jamba2 3B | Q4_K_M | 2.7 GB | 1.4 tok/s | Very slowtight fit |
| 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Unlimited OCR (3B-A0.6B) | Q2_K | 2.7 GB | 11.5 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
Best Image models for the BeagleBone AI-64 (4 GB)
| Quality | Model | Quant | Memory | Speed | Runs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | SD Turbo | FP16 | 2.6 GB | 30 s | Runs welltight fit · encoder unloaded after use |
| 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Realistic Vision V5.1 | FP16 | 2.5 GB | 7.6 min | Very slowtight fit · encoder unloaded after use |
| 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | DreamShaper 8 | FP16 | 2.5 GB | 7.6 min | Very slowtight fit · encoder unloaded after use |
| 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | LCM DreamShaper v7 | FP16 | 2.5 GB | 1.6 min | Slowtight fit · encoder unloaded after use |
| 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | PixArt-Σ XL 1024 | FP16 | 2.3 GB | 11.8 min | Very slowCPU offload |
| 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Stable Diffusion 1.5 | FP16 | 2.5 GB | 7.6 min | Very slowtight fit · encoder unloaded after use |
Best Video models for the BeagleBone AI-64 (4 GB)
| Quality | Model | Quant | Memory | Speed | Runs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 42/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | AnimateDiff v3 (SD 1.5) | FP16 | 2.6 GB | 2.6 h | Very slowtight fit · CPU offload |
Best Decision models for the BeagleBone AI-64 (4 GB)
| Quality | Model | Quant | Memory | Speed | Runs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Jina Reranker v3.5 | Q8_0 | 1.7 GB | 25.9 s | Very slow |
| 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Jina Reranker v3 | Q8_0 | 1.7 GB | 25.9 s | Very slow |
| 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GLiNER2.5 Decide | Q8_0 | 1.2 GB | 11.4 s | Very slow |
| 81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | mxbai-rerank-large v2 | Q6_K | 2.1 GB | 66.2 s | Very slow |
| 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | FRIDA-Decisions | Q8_0 | 1.7 GB | 19.0 s | Very slow |
| 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Qwen3 Reranker 0.6B | Q8_0 | 1.7 GB | 25.9 s | Very slow |
| 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | OpenAI Privacy Filter | Q8_0 | 2.4 GB | 1.2 s | Slowtight fit |
| 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Llama Prompt Guard 2 86M | Q8_0 | 1.0 GB | 13.0 s | Very slow |
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.
