QNAP TS-832PX

Hardware · Annapurna Labs (Amazon)

What AI models can the Annapurna Labs Alpine AL324 NAS (8 GB) run?

RAM
8.0 GB
Usable for models
5.2 GB
Memory bandwidth
13 GB/s
Runs models on
CPU cores
Released
2017

A NAS with this chip runs models on its processor cores, so memory speed sets the pace: small models (about 1-4B) answer at a usable speed, bigger ones are slow. We plan around 5.2 GB for models, what is left after the NAS system and its storage services. Models run in a container (Docker) or the maker’s app store, and speeds assume the NAS isn’t busy with storage work.

More about this hardware

MakerAnnapurna Labs (Amazon)
TypeNAS (network attached storage) processor
Share of memory for models65% (what the NAS system and its storage services typically leave free at this size)
ChipAnnapurna Labs Alpine AL324
AI acceleratorNone. Models run on the processor cores.
NAS models with this chipQNAP TS-832PX · QNAP TS-932PX · QNAP TS-832X · QNAP TS-932X · QNAP TS-332X · QNAP TS-1232PXU-RP · QNAP TS-832PXU-RP · QNAP TS-832PXU · QNAP TS-432PXU-RP · QNAP TS-432PXU · QNAP TS-432XeU · QNAP TS-432XU · QNAP TS-832XU · QNAP TS-1232XU · QNAP TS-432XU-RP · QNAP TS-832XU-RP · QNAP TS-1232XU-RP
Memory typeSystem RAM, shared with the NAS operating system and its storage services
Bandwidth figure12.8 GB/s, estimated, see the note below
NoteOne profile for every NAS built on this chip. Memory speed is an estimate from the chip’s supported memory in a typical NAS fitting; a unit with one memory module runs slower than one with two. Speed assumes the NAS is not busy with storage work.
Specificationswww.qnap.com

Apps that run models well on the Annapurna Labs Alpine AL324 NAS (8 GB)

For a typical model that fits in memory. Each model page picks the best app for that model on this hardware. All apps

6 products with the Annapurna Labs Alpine AL324 NAS (8 GB)

Best LLMs for the Annapurna Labs Alpine AL324 NAS (8 GB)

Quality Model Quant Memory Speed Runs
65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 4BNVIDIA Q5_K_M 4.3 GB 0.9 tok/s Very slow
64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Spark-X2.6 4BSparkLLM Q5_K_M 4.2 GB 0.9 tok/s Very slow
64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Nanbeige4.2 3BBOSS Zhipin (Nanbeige) Q4_K_M 5.0 GB 1.0 tok/s Very slowtight fit
59Good quality (B) · 59 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. MiniCPM5 2BOpenBMB Q6_K 3.4 GB 1.2 tok/s Very slow
59Good quality (B) · 59 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. TMax 4BAi2 Q5_K_M 4.3 GB 0.9 tok/s Very slow
58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3.5 4BAlibaba Q4_K_M 4.1 GB 0.9 tok/s Very slow
58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4BNVIDIA Q3_K_M 5.1 GB 1.3 tok/s Very slowtight fit
57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Agents-A1 4BInternScience Q4_K_M 4.1 GB 1.0 tok/s Very slow
57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Gemma 4 E4BGoogle Q3_K_M 5.1 GB 1.3 tok/s Very slowtight fit
55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Fara 1.5 4BMicrosoft Q4_K_M 4.1 GB 1.0 tok/s Very slow
57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Mage-VL-Cowork 4.7BMicrosoft Q4_K_M 5.1 GB 0.9 tok/s Very slowtight fit
50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Ling 3.0 Tiny (8B-A1.3B)Ant Group (inclusionAI) Q3_K_M 5.1 GB 4.3 tok/s Slowtight fit

Best Image models for the Annapurna Labs Alpine AL324 NAS (8 GB)

Quality Model Quant Memory Speed Runs
90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. FLUX 3 Image KleinBlack Forest Labs Q8 GGUF 4.3 GB 58.9 min Very slowCPU offload
72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. FLUX.2 [klein] 4BBlack Forest Labs Q4 GGUF 4.6 GB 8.7 min Very slowtight fit · encoder unloaded after use
82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Z-Image TurboAlibaba (Tongyi) FP8 4.4 GB 20.2 min Very slowCPU offload
81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. ERNIE-ImageBaidu Q4 GGUF 4.1 GB 4.0 h Very slowCPU offload
81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. MOSS-Image SFTOpenMOSS Q8 GGUF 4.1 GB 2.4 h Very slowCPU offload
39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. SDXL TurboStability AI FP8 4.2 GB 56 s Slow

Best Video models for the Annapurna Labs Alpine AL324 NAS (8 GB)

Quality Model Quant Memory Speed Runs
35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. AnimateDiff v3 (SD 1.5)Shanghai AI Lab FP16 4.7 GB 2.3 h Very slowtight fit
49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. LTX-Video 2BLightricks FP8 4.0 GB 3.4 h Very slowCPU offload
44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 46/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. CogVideoX 2BZhipu AI FP8 4.7 GB 8.1 h Very slowtight fit · CPU offload

Best Decision models for the Annapurna Labs Alpine AL324 NAS (8 GB)

Quality Model Quant Memory Speed Runs
87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3 Reranker 4BAlibaba Q5_K_M 4.2 GB 206.9 s Very slow
86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Jina Reranker v3.5Jina AI Q8_0 1.9 GB 31.0 s Very slow
85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. zerank-2ZeroEntropy Q5_K_M 4.2 GB 206.9 s Very slow
84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Jina Reranker v3Jina AI Q8_0 1.9 GB 31.0 s Very slow
85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Shieldstral 1.0 3BMistral AI Q6_K 4.4 GB 198.4 s Very slow
82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. mxbai-rerank-large v2Mixedbread Q8_0 2.7 GB 79.5 s Very slow
82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. d1 3BLiquid AI Q8_0 4.4 GB 81.3 s Very slow
80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GLiNER2.5 DecideFastino Q8_0 1.2 GB 13.6 s Very slow

Best LLMs by task on this hardware Open in Model Finder

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.

Was this page helpful?