ORICO CyberData Vault CF56 Pro

Hardware · Intel

What AI models can the Intel Core i5-1240P / i5-1340P NAS (12 GB) run?

RAM
12.0 GB
Usable for models
8.4 GB
Memory bandwidth
38 GB/s
Runs models on
CPU cores
Released
2022

A NAS with this chip runs models on its processor cores, so memory speed sets the pace: small models (about 1-4B) answer at a usable speed, bigger ones are slow. We plan around 8.4 GB for models, what is left after the NAS system and its storage services. Models run in a container (Docker) or the maker’s app store, and speeds assume the NAS isn’t busy with storage work.

More about this hardware

MakerIntel
TypeNAS (network attached storage) processor
Share of memory for models70% (what the NAS system and its storage services typically leave free at this size)
ChipIntel Core i5-1240P / i5-1340P
AI acceleratorIntegrated graphics; NAS systems normally run models on the processor cores.
NAS models with this chipORICO CyberData Vault CF56 Pro · ORICO CyberData Vault CF1000 · ORICO CyberData CF56 Pro · ORICO CyberData CF1000 · QNAP TBS-h574TX
Memory typeSystem RAM, shared with the NAS operating system and its storage services
Bandwidth figure38.4 GB/s, estimated, see the note below
NoteOne profile for every NAS built on this chip. Memory speed is an estimate from the chip’s supported memory in a typical NAS fitting; a unit with one memory module runs slower than one with two. Speed assumes the NAS is not busy with storage work.
Specificationswww.orico.cc

Apps that run models well on the Intel Core i5-1240P / i5-1340P NAS (12 GB)

For a typical model that fits in memory. Each model page picks the best app for that model on this hardware. All apps

1 product with the Intel Core i5-1240P / i5-1340P NAS (12 GB)

Best LLMs for the Intel Core i5-1240P / i5-1340P NAS (12 GB)

Quality Model Quant Memory Speed Runs
57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Ling 3.0 Tiny (8B-A1.3B)Ant Group (inclusionAI) Q4_K_M 6.3 GB 31.5 tok/s Runs great
76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. K2 Horizon 7BInstitute of Foundation Models Q4_K_M 8.0 GB 5.1 tok/s Slowtight fit
75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. MiMo V2.6 Distill Qwen 9BXiaomi Q5_K_M 8.2 GB 4.0 tok/s Slowtight fit
74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. SenseNova Loop 9B PreviewSenseTime Q4_K_M 7.6 GB 4.7 tok/s Slowtight fit
66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4BNVIDIA Q4_K_M 6.3 GB 10.2 tok/s Runs well
74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Ornith 1.5 9BDeepReinforce Q5_K_M 8.4 GB 3.9 tok/s Slowtight fit
70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. TMax 9BAi2 Q4_K_M 7.0 GB 5.1 tok/s Slow
73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3.5 9BAlibaba Q5_K_M 8.4 GB 3.9 tok/s Slowtight fit
64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Gemma 4 E4BGoogle Q4_K_M 6.3 GB 10.2 tok/s Runs well
58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Mellum2.1 Thinking (12B-A2.5B)JetBrains Q3_K_M 7.3 GB 22.0 tok/s Runs welltight fit
64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Nanbeige4.2 3BBOSS Zhipin (Nanbeige) Q4_K_M 5.3 GB 11.0 tok/s Runs well
72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Ornith 1.0 9BDeepReinforce Q5_K_M 8.4 GB 3.9 tok/s Slowtight fit

Best Image models for the Intel Core i5-1240P / i5-1340P NAS (12 GB)

Quality Model Quant Memory Speed Runs
89Excellent quality (A+) · 89 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. FLUX 3 Image KleinBlack Forest Labs FP8 7.9 GB 8.1 min Very slowtight fit · encoder unloaded after use
76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. FLUX.2 [klein] 4BBlack Forest Labs FP8 6.2 GB 85 s Slowencoder unloaded after use
78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Z-Image TurboAlibaba (Tongyi) Q4 GGUF 6.1 GB 4.7 min Very slowencoder unloaded after use
78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. FLUX.2 [klein] 9BBlack Forest Labs Q4 GGUF 8.0 GB 3.4 min Very slowtight fit · encoder unloaded after use
79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. ERNIE-Image TurboBaidu Q4 GGUF 7.4 GB 6.0 min Very slowtight fit · encoder unloaded after use
81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. ERNIE-ImageBaidu Q4 GGUF 7.4 GB 41.5 min Very slowtight fit · encoder unloaded after use

Best Video models for the Intel Core i5-1240P / i5-1340P NAS (12 GB)

Quality Model Quant Memory Speed Runs
49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. LTX-Video 2BLightricks FP8 6.1 GB 35.3 min Slowencoder unloaded after use
74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. HY-OmniWeaving (8.3B, unified video)Tencent FP8 7.8 GB 15.5 h Very slowtight fit · CPU offload
53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Wan 2.1 T2V 1.3BAlibaba FP8 7.1 GB 5.7 h Very slowtight fit · encoder unloaded after use
53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Wan 2.1 VACE 1.3BAlibaba FP8 8.0 GB 6.1 h Very slowtight fit · encoder unloaded after use
35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. AnimateDiff v3 (SD 1.5)Shanghai AI Lab FP16 4.7 GB 29.9 min Slow

Best Decision models for the Intel Core i5-1240P / i5-1340P NAS (12 GB)

Quality Model Quant Memory Speed Runs
78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. OpenAI Privacy FilterOpenAI F16 3.8 GB 55 ms Runs great
68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Llama Prompt Guard 2 22MMeta Q8_0 0.7 GB 129 ms Runs great
86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Jina Reranker v3.5Jina AI Q8_0 2.1 GB 1.0 s Slow
80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GLiNER2.5 DecideFastino Q8_0 1.2 GB 437 ms Slow
84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Jina Reranker v3Jina AI Q8_0 2.1 GB 1.0 s Slow
90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3 Reranker 4BAlibaba Q8_0 5.8 GB 6.7 s Very slow
80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. FRIDA-DecisionsSber AI Q8_0 1.7 GB 728 ms Slow
88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. zerank-2ZeroEntropy Q8_0 5.8 GB 6.7 s Very slow

Best LLMs by task on this hardware Open in Model Finder

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.

Was this page helpful?