QNAP TS-433eU

Products · · NAS

QNAP TS-433eU

Processor
Rockchip RK3568
Memory (RAM)
4 GB
Released
2024

Product page (opens in a new tab) Full AI report

Specifications

MakerQNAP
TypeNAS
ProcessorRockchip RK3568 NAS (4 GB)
Memory (RAM)4.0 GB
Usable for AI models2.0 GB
Memory bandwidth13 GB/s
FP16 compute0.1 TFLOPS
Runs models onCPU cores
Drive bays4 x 3.5-inch SATA 6Gb/s, 3Gb/s
NAS systemQTS
Containers (Docker)Yes
Virtual machinesNo
Memory upgradeup to 4.0 GB per the maker
NotesARM 4-core Cortex-A55 2.0GHz processor. ARM Cortex-A55 quad-core with 4 GB soldered RAM (not expandable) and an NPU used for QNAP image recognition. Container Station is supported, but 4 GB and a low-power ARM CPU leave room only for tiny (about 1B) models, and QNAP's Ollama tutorial says only a few ARM models are supported. No PCIe slot.
Product pagewww.qnap.com (opens in a new tab)

Running AI on the QNAP TS-433eU

It can, with limits: expect small models only, at modest speed. Models run on its CPU cores, and this configuration leaves about 2.0 GB for them after the NAS system and its storage services. The grades below assume the NAS isn’t busy with backups or media work at the same time.

Apps you can install to run models

AppHow it installs
Ollama In a container (Docker)
Open WebUI In a container (Docker)

Apps that run LLMs on a NAS, with their container images

AI features from QNAP

FeatureWhat it doesWhere the AI runs
QuMagie + QNAP AI Core Photo management with on-device face, object and scene recognition (QNAP AI Core image-recognition engine). On the NAS
Qsirch RAG Search (cloud LLM mode) Chat with NAS files using a cloud LLM (Gemini, OpenAI, Azure OpenAI or OpenAI-compatible API); the model runs remotely. Cloud service or another computer
AI Service Center (beta) cloud models Central hub for connecting NAS apps to cloud models (OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, Gemini, Claude, OpenAI-compatible); local model library is limited to x86 NAS with a tested GPU (third-party report). Cloud service or another computer

Best LLMs for the QNAP TS-433eU

Quality Model Quant Memory Speed Runs
47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. LFM3 1.7BLiquid AI Q3_K_M 1.7 GB 3.3 tok/s Slowtight fit
39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. PaddleOCR-VL 1.6 0.9BBaidu Q4_K_M 1.5 GB 4.5 tok/s Slow
39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. MiniCPM-OCR 1.0 1.3BOpenBMB Q4_K_M 1.7 GB 3.4 tok/s Slow
35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. LFM3-VL 2BLiquid AI Q2_K 1.6 GB 3.7 tok/s Slow
34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. MiniCPM5 1BOpenBMB Q4_K_M 1.6 GB 4.0 tok/s Slow
33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. MiniCPM-V 4.7 1BOpenBMB Q3_K_M 1.6 GB 3.6 tok/s Slow
30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. LFM2.5 1.2B InstructLiquid AI Q4_K_M 1.6 GB 3.7 tok/s Slow
33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. TMax 2BAi2 Q3_K_M 1.8 GB 3.0 tok/s Slowtight fit
30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. LFM2.5 2.6BLiquid AI Q2_K 2.0 GB 2.7 tok/s Very slowtight fit
24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3.5 0.8BAlibaba Q4_K_M 1.4 GB 5.0 tok/s Slow

Best Image models for the QNAP TS-433eU

Quality Model Quant Memory Speed Runs
39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. SDXL TurboStability AI FP8 1.6 GB 63 s SlowCPU offload
42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Realistic Vision V5.1SG161222 FP16 1.3 GB 9.4 min Very slowCPU offload
28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 46/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. SD TurboStability AI FP16 1.3 GB 38 s Runs wellCPU offload
40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 46/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. DreamShaper 8Lykon FP16 1.3 GB 9.4 min Very slowCPU offload
30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 44/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. LCM DreamShaper v7Tsinghua (LCM) FP16 1.3 GB 2.0 min SlowCPU offload
35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 44/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Stable Diffusion 1.5Stability AI / Runway FP16 1.3 GB 9.4 min Very slowCPU offload

Best Video models for the QNAP TS-433eU

None of the video models in our catalog fit in this much memory.

Best Decision models for the QNAP TS-433eU

Quality Model Quant Memory Speed Runs
86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Jina Reranker v3.5Jina AI Q8_0 1.6 GB 25.9 s Very slow
84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Jina Reranker v3Jina AI Q8_0 1.6 GB 25.9 s Very slow
80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GLiNER2.5 DecideFastino Q8_0 1.2 GB 11.4 s Very slow
80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. FRIDA-DecisionsSber AI Q8_0 1.7 GB 19.0 s Very slow
80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3 Reranker 0.6BAlibaba Q8_0 1.6 GB 25.9 s Very slow
76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Llama Prompt Guard 2 86MMeta Q8_0 1.0 GB 13.0 s Very slow
79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. mxbai-rerank-large v2Mixedbread Q5_K_M 1.9 GB 66.1 s Very slowtight fit
76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. mxbai-rerank-base v2Mixedbread Q8_0 1.3 GB 21.1 s Very slow

Other products with the Rockchip RK3568 NAS (4 GB)

Spec sources

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.

Was this page helpful?