Olmo 3.1 32B Think on NVIDIA H100 NVL
Can the NVIDIA H100 NVL run Olmo 3.1 32B Think?
Yes, it runs great
Runs great. At Q8_0 it needs about 40.2 GB of 94.0 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 75.6 tok/s.
- Best quant
Q8_0- Generation speed
- 75.6 tok/s
- Prompt processing
- 2,681 tok/s
- First token (1K prompt)
- 0.4 s
- Largest safe context
- 64K
Best app to run it on the NVIDIA H100 NVL
On Linux
- The full model fits in GPU memory at 8-bit, so it can batch many requests: best for serving a team or an app.
vllm serve allenai/Olmo-3.1-32B-ThinkOn Windows
- One command with Ollama’s own build of this model.
- Serves an OpenAI-compatible API that other apps and coding tools can use.
ollama run olmo-3.1:32b-think-q8_0Download Olmo 3.1 32B Think
Recommended for the NVIDIA H100 NVL: Q8_0. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.
Quickest · Ollama
One command downloads a ready-to-run version and starts a chat.
ollama run olmo-3.1:32b-think-q8_0Quantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
Download the Q8_0 file (opens in a new tab)
huggingface.co/unsloth/Olmo-3.1-32B-Think-GGUF (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/unsloth/Olmo-3.1-32B-Think-GGUF:Q8_0Original weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from Ai2, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
huggingface.co/allenai/Olmo-3.1-32B-Think (opens in a new tab)
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Ai2. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/allenai/OLMo (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/allenai/OLMoHow it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 34.2 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 25.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 9.9 / 15 | |
| Match score | 84.1 / 100 |
Every quantization on the NVIDIA H100 NVL
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 18.9 GB | 94.0 GB | 244 tok/s | Runs great | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q3_K_M | 21.8 GB | 94.0 GB | 192 tok/s | Runs great | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 25.7 GB | 94.0 GB | 149 tok/s | Runs great | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 28.9 GB | 94.0 GB | 123 tok/s | Runs great | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 32.5 GB | 94.0 GB | 103 tok/s | Runs great | 75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 40.2 GB | 94.0 GB | 75.6 tok/s | Runs great | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 70.5 GB | 94.0 GB | 34.8 tok/s | Runs great | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Other hardware that runs it
-
73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
-
72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
-
72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
-
72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
-
75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
-
72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Max (64 GB)
Quick answers
How much memory does Olmo 3.1 32B Think need on the NVIDIA H100 NVL 94GB?
At Q8_0 it needs about 40.2 GB. The NVIDIA H100 NVL 94GB has 94.0 GB usable.
How fast is Olmo 3.1 32B Think on the NVIDIA H100 NVL 94GB?
About 75.6 tok/s at Q8_0, an estimate from the hardware’s memory bandwidth and the size of the model.
Which quantization of Olmo 3.1 32B Think should I use on the NVIDIA H100 NVL 94GB?
Q8_0. Of the versions that fit, it is the one that runs best; when two run equally well, the check prefers the higher-rated one.
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.