Olmo 3.1 32B Think on AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (64 GB)
Can the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (64 GB) run Olmo 3.1 32B Think?
Yes, it runs well
Runs well. At Q3_K_M it needs about 21.0 GB of 48.0 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 10.9 tok/s.
- Best quant
Q3_K_M- Generation speed
- 10.9 tok/s
- Prompt processing
- 883 tok/s
- First token (1K prompt)
- 1.2 s
- Largest safe context
- 64K
Best app to run it on the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (64 GB)
On Windows
- Built for Ryzen AI and Strix Halo, including NPU + iGPU modes on Windows.
lemonade pull unsloth/Olmo-3.1-32B-Think-GGUF:Q3_K_MOn Linux
- Built for Ryzen AI and Strix Halo, including NPU + iGPU modes on Windows.
lemonade pull unsloth/Olmo-3.1-32B-Think-GGUF:Q3_K_MDownload Olmo 3.1 32B Think
Recommended for the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (64 GB): Q3_K_M. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.
Quickest · Ollama
One command downloads a ready-to-run version and starts a chat.
ollama run olmo-3.1:32b-thinkQuantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
Download the Q3_K_M file (opens in a new tab)
huggingface.co/unsloth/Olmo-3.1-32B-Think-GGUF (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/unsloth/Olmo-3.1-32B-Think-GGUF:Q3_K_MOriginal weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from Ai2, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
huggingface.co/allenai/Olmo-3.1-32B-Think (opens in a new tab)
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Ai2. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/allenai/OLMo (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/allenai/OLMoHow it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 28.7 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 25.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 7.8 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 10.1 / 15 | |
| Match score | 71.6 / 100 |
Every quantization on the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (64 GB)
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 18.1 GB | 48.0 GB | 13.8 tok/s | Runs well | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q3_K_M | 21.0 GB | 48.0 GB | 10.9 tok/s | Runs well | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 24.8 GB | 48.0 GB | 8.4 tok/s | Slow | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 28.1 GB | 48.0 GB | 6.9 tok/s | Slow | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 31.6 GB | 48.0 GB | 5.8 tok/s | Slow | 75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 39.3 GB | 48.0 GB | 4.3 tok/s | Slow | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 69.6 GB | 48.0 GB | — | Won't run | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Other hardware that runs it
-
73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
-
72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
-
72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
-
72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
-
75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
-
72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Max (64 GB)
Quick answers
How much memory does Olmo 3.1 32B Think need on the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 64GB?
At Q3_K_M it needs about 21.0 GB. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 64GB has 48.0 GB usable.
How fast is Olmo 3.1 32B Think on the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 64GB?
About 10.9 tok/s at Q3_K_M, an estimate from the hardware’s memory bandwidth and the size of the model.
Which quantization of Olmo 3.1 32B Think should I use on the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 64GB?
Q3_K_M. Of the versions that fit, it is the one that runs best; when two run equally well, the check prefers the higher-rated one.
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.