AMD Ryzen 7000 series (desktop, incl. PRO 7645 / 7745) NAS (64 GB) vs AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT for local AI
Pick two to four systems or devices to see which runs more models, faster, for the kind of work you do.
Winner: AMD Ryzen 7000 series (desktop, incl. PRO 7645 / 7745) NAS (64 GB)
For general chat: Its ten best models average a score of 93 vs 90; it runs 29 more LLMs (520 vs 491). On the other hand, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is about 2.2× faster on its own top models.
Side by side
Swap sides All models on the Ryzen 7000 series (desktop, incl. PRO 7645 / 7745) NAS All models on the RX 7600 XT
 AMD Ryzen 7000 series (desktop, incl. PRO 7645 / 7745) NAS (64 GB)
|
 AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Memory | 64.0 GB unified | 16.0 GB VRAM |
| Usable for models | 54.4 GB | 16.0 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 83 GB/s | 288 GB/s |
| FP16 compute | 0.7 TFLOPS | 45.1 TFLOPS |
| Launch price | — | $329 |
| Released | 2022 | 2024 |
| LLMs that run | 520 of 622 | 491 of 622 |
| LLMs that run well | 387 | 457 |
| Image models that run | 61 of 61 | 55 of 61 |
| Video models that run | 42 of 43 | 17 of 43 |
| Decision models that run | 69 of 70 | 68 of 70 |
| Top-10 LLM average score | 93 | 90 |
| Top-10 LLM average speed | 26.8 tok/s | 59.9 tok/s |
| Best LLM | Kolibri 1 (78B-A3.5B) | Gemma 4 26B-A4B |
Highlighted values are the best of the two. Model results assume 8K of context and the default macOS GPU memory limit on Macs.
LLMs
520 of 622 LLMs run on the AMD Ryzen 7000 series (desktop, incl. PRO 7645 / 7745) NAS (64 GB). 54.4 GB usable for models.
491 of 622 LLMs run on the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT. 16.0 GB usable for models.
| Model | QualityRyzen 7000 series (desktop, incl. PRO 7645 / 7745) NAS | SpeedRyzen 7000 series (desktop, incl. PRO 7645 / 7745) NAS | RunsRyzen 7000 series (desktop, incl. PRO 7645 / 7745) NAS | QualityRX 7600 XT | SpeedRX 7600 XT | RunsRX 7600 XT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kolibri 1 (78B-A3.5B) | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 94/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 23.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 49.6 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Flint (40B-A2.5B) | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 94/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 31.5 tok/s | Runs great | 75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 70.7 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Qwen3.6 35B-A3B | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 tok/s | Runs well | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 110 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Qwen3.5 35B-A3B | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 tok/s | Runs well | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 110 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 tok/s | Runs well | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 110 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Nex N2 Mini (35B-A3B) | 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 92/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 tok/s | Runs well | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 110 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Sage-A1.5 35B-A3B | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 92/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 tok/s | Runs well | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 110 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Ornith 1.5 35B-A3B | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 92/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 tok/s | Runs well | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 110 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Apodex 1.1 Mini (35B-A3B) | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 tok/s | Runs well | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 110 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Ornith 1.0 35B-A3B | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 tok/s | Runs well | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 110 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Thinking | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.8 tok/s | Runs great | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 54.9 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Agents-A1 35B-A3B | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 tok/s | Runs well | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 110 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Qwen AgentWorld 35B-A3B | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 tok/s | Runs well | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 110 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Qwen3 Next 80B-A3B Instruct | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.8 tok/s | Runs great | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 54.9 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| GLM-4.7 Flash (30B-A3B) | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 tok/s | Runs well | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 110 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Gemma 4 26B-A4B | 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.5 tok/s | Runs well | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 77.5 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Kimi Linear 48B-A3B | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 tok/s | Runs well | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 74.8 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Laguna XS 2.1 (33B-A3B) | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 tok/s | Runs well | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 67.5 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.1 tok/s | Runs well | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.6 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Qwen3 Coder Next (80B-A3B) | 81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 55.3 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Raon-1 mini Preview (30B-A4B) | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.1 tok/s | Runs well | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 92/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 70.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| KAT-Coder V2.5 Dev (35B-A3B) | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 tok/s | Runs well | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 110 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Nemotron Cascade 2 30B-A3B | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 23.2 tok/s | Runs well | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 98.8 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507 | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 24.5 tok/s | Runs well | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 103 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B Thinking | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 24.5 tok/s | Runs well | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 103 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 23.2 tok/s | Runs well | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 98.8 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Qwen3.8 27B | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.2 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Sarvam 30B | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.6 tok/s | Runs great | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 126 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Qwen3.6 27B | 89Excellent quality (A+) · 89 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.2 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B Instruct | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 24.5 tok/s | Runs well | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 103 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Hunyuan Hy-Memory 30B-A3B | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 tok/s | Runs well | 59Good quality (B) · 59 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 110 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Qwen3 30B-A3B | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 24.5 tok/s | Runs well | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 103 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Qwen3.5 27B | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.2 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| LFM2.5 24B-A2B | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.0 tok/s | Runs great | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 106 tok/s | Runs great |
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 tok/s | Runs well | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 110 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Qwen3-Omni 30B-A3B Instruct | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 24.5 tok/s | Runs well | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 61.6 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B IT | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.5 tok/s | Runs well | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 74.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.5 tok/s | Very slow | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| TMax 27B | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| North Mini Code 1.0 (30B-A3B) | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 tok/s | Runs well | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 110 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Fara 1.5 27B | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Mistral Small 4 (119B-A6B) | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 22.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| UI-Mate 27B | 81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507 | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 24.5 tok/s | Runs well | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 103 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Qwen3 Coder 30B-A3B | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 24.5 tok/s | Runs well | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 103 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| gpt-oss 20B | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 24.0 tok/s | Runs well | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 69.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Nanbeige4.3 33B | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.0 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Axion 1.0 35B | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 tok/s | Runs well | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 110 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Trinity Mini (26B-A3B) | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 tok/s | Runs well | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 92.1 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Ling 2.6 Flash (104B-A7.4B) | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Ling Flash 2.0 (100B-A6B) | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 22.0 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Maple Preview (20B-A1B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.7 tok/s | Runs great | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 106 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| NorthCUA Mini | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 tok/s | Runs well | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 110 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Hermes 4 70B | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.2 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.8 tok/s | Very slowheavy RAM offload |
| Llama 3.3 70B Instruct | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.2 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.8 tok/s | Very slowheavy RAM offload |
| GLM-4.6V | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Gemma 4 31B | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.6 tok/s | Slow | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.0 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Leanstral 119B-A6B | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.8 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.2 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.6 tok/s | Very slowheavy RAM offload |
| Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.2 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.6 tok/s | Very slowheavy RAM offload |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slow | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.8 tok/s | Runs well |
| ERNIE 4.5 21B-A3B | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 tok/s | Runs well | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 75.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.2 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.8 tok/s | Very slowheavy RAM offload |
| Tülu 3 70B | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.2 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.8 tok/s | Very slowheavy RAM offload |
| GLM-4.5V | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Solar Open 100B | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Groot 65B A6B 261023 | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 22.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Devstral Small 2 (24B) | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 tok/s | Slow | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Granite 4.2 30B | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 tok/s | Slow | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.1 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Ling 3.0 Tiny (8B-A1.3B) | 59Good quality (B) · 59 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.1 tok/s | Runs great | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 82.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| GLM-4.5 Air (106B-A12B) | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Llama 3.1 70B Instruct | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.2 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.8 tok/s | Very slowheavy RAM offload |
| Sarvam 105B | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.8 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| LFM2 24B-A2B | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.9 tok/s | Runs great | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 110 tok/s | Runs great |
| Hunyuan A13B (80B-A13B) | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.7 tok/s | Runs well | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.3 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Laguna S 2.1 (118B-A8B) | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.1 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| InternVL3 78B | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.5 tok/s | Very slow | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.4 tok/s | Very slowheavy RAM offload |
| Kimi Dev 72B | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.2 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.6 tok/s | Very slowheavy RAM offload |
| Phi-3.5 MoE (42B-A6.6B) | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.8 tok/s | Runs well | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.0 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Hermes 3 (Llama 3.1 70B) | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.2 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.8 tok/s | Very slowheavy RAM offload |
| QVQ 72B Preview | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.2 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.6 tok/s | Very slowheavy RAM offload |
| Ling Mini 2.0 (16B-A1.4B) | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.7 tok/s | Runs great | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 110 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 4.1 30B | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 tok/s | Slow | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.3 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| ERNIE 4.5 21B-A3B Thinking | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 tok/s | Runs well | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 75.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Seed-OSS 36B Instruct | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.0 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| EXAONE 4.5 33B | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.2 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.8 tok/s | Very slowheavy RAM offload |
| Apertus v1.5 70B | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.2 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.7 tok/s | Very slowheavy RAM offload |
| Apriel 1.5 15B Thinker | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 tok/s | Slow | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.5 tok/s | Runs well |
| Ring Flash 2.0 (100B-A6B) | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 22.0 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.5 tok/s | Runs well | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Gemma 4 E2B | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.2 tok/s | Runs great | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 67.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Hermes 4.3 36B | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.0 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Gemma 3 27B IT | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Devstral Small 1.1 (24B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.7 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Magistral Small 2507 | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.7 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Kimi-VL A3B Thinking 2506 | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 tok/s | Runs well | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 64.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| Phi-4 Reasoning Vision 15B | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.0 tok/s | Slow | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen2 72B Instruct | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.2 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.6 tok/s | Very slowheavy RAM offload |
| Qwen2-VL 72B Instruct | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.2 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.6 tok/s | Very slowheavy RAM offload |
| Groot 19B A3B 261023 | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 tok/s | Runs well | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 75.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen3-VL 32B Instruct | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.7 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Gemma 4 E4B | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.5 tok/s | Runs well | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Nanbeige4.2 3B | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.1 tok/s | Runs well | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 50.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Mistral Small 3.2 24B | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 tok/s | Slow | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| MedGemma 27B Text IT | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Magistral Small 2506 | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.7 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 4B | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 22.1 tok/s | Runs well | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Mellum2.1 Thinking (12B-A2.5B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 31.5 tok/s | Runs great | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 64.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.3 tok/s | Slowtight fit | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| K2 Horizon 7B | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.6 tok/s | Runs well | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen3 32B | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.4 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Qwen3 14B | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 tok/s | Slow | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| Mistral Small 3.1 24B | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 tok/s | Slow | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Terminal RSI 27B | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.2 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| MiniCPM5 2B | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.9 tok/s | Runs great | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 61.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Spark-X2.6 4B | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.4 tok/s | Runs well | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 51.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| LFM2.5 8B-A1B | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.4 tok/s | Runs great | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 74.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Apertus 70B Instruct | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.2 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 46/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.8 tok/s | Very slowheavy RAM offload |
| Qwen2 57B-A14B Instruct | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.2 tok/s | Slow | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.5 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Hemmingway 1.5 | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| LFM3 1.7B | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.0 tok/s | Runs great | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Hermes 4 14B | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 tok/s | Slow | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| SenseNova Loop 9B Preview | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.8 tok/s | Runs well | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 31.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Command A (111B) | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Mistral Small 3 24B (2501) | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.7 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Granite 4.2 8B | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.0 tok/s | Runs well | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| GLM-4 32B 0414 | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Ornith 1.5 9B | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.8 tok/s | Runs well | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 31.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Llama 3 70B Instruct | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.2 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 46/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.8 tok/s | Very slowheavy RAM offload |
| InternVL3 14B | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.0 tok/s | Slow | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| Phi-4 (14B) | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.2 tok/s | Slow | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.7 tok/s | Runs well |
| Dolphin Mistral 24B Venice Edition | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 tok/s | Slow | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Qwen3.5 9B | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.8 tok/s | Runs well | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 31.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.5 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| EXAONE 4.0 32B | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.6 tok/s | Slow | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Ornith 1.0 9B | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.8 tok/s | Runs well | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 31.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.4 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Baichuan M2 32B | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.4 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Gemma 2 27B IT | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Granite 4.0 H Small (32B-A9B) | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.1 tok/s | Runs well | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 47.3 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| TMax 9B | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.7 tok/s | Runs well | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Magistral Small 1.2 (24B) | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 tok/s | Slow | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.2 tok/s | Slow | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.7 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen3.5 4B | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.9 tok/s | Runs well | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| TMax 4B | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.9 tok/s | Runs well | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 50.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Dolphin 3.0 R1 Mistral 24B | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.7 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Kimi-VL A3B Instruct | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 tok/s | Runs well | 48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 64.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5-VL 32B Instruct | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.6 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Voxtral Small 24B | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.6 tok/s | Slow | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.2 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Phi-4 Reasoning Plus (14B) | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.2 tok/s | Slow | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.8 tok/s | Runs well |
| Solar Pro Preview 22B | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.8 tok/s | Runs well |
| Agents-A1 4B | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.4 tok/s | Runs well | 59Good quality (B) · 59 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5 14B Instruct 1M | 59Good quality (B) · 59 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 tok/s | Slow | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| Granite 4.0 H Tiny (7B-A1B) | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 50.0 tok/s | Runs great | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 97.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| LFM3-VL 2B | 48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.8 tok/s | Runs great | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 80.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| InternVL3.5 8B | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.3 tok/s | Runs well | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Phi-4 Reasoning (14B) | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.2 tok/s | Slow | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.8 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen3-VL 8B Instruct | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.0 tok/s | Runs well | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Command R+ (08-2024) 104B | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.4 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Gemma 4 12B | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.1 tok/s | Runs well | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 25.5 tok/s | Runs well |
| QwQ 32B | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.4 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Fara 1.5 4B | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.4 tok/s | Runs well | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Command R 35B (v01) | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow | 37Basic quality (D) · 37 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 46/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.8 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Moonlight 16B-A3B Instruct | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 tok/s | Runs well | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 64.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| Falcon-H1 34B Instruct | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.7 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Qwen3 8B | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.7 tok/s | Runs well | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 4.1 8B | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.0 tok/s | Runs well | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| InternVL3.5 38B | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slow | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| MiniCPM-V 4.5 8B | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.1 tok/s | Runs well | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Mage-VL 4.7B | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.6 tok/s | Runs well | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| OpenReasoning Nemotron 32B | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.4 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Skywork OR1 32B | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.4 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.9 tok/s | Runs well | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 52.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Devstral Small 2505 | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.7 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Command A Reasoning (111B) | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Mistral Small 22B (2409) | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.7 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Qwen3-VL 4B Instruct | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.8 tok/s | Runs well | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 47.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Ornith 1.5 122B-A10B | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.7 tok/s | Runs wellover memory limit | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Olmo 3.1 32B Think | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.5 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| MiMo-VL 7B RL | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.6 tok/s | Runs well | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Command R (08-2024) 32B | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.5 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Apriel Nemotron 15B Thinker | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 tok/s | Slow | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Granite 4.2 3B | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 24.0 tok/s | Runs well | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| AceReason Nemotron 14B | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 tok/s | Slow | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| OpenReasoning Nemotron 14B | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 tok/s | Slow | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen2.5 Coder 14B Instruct | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 tok/s | Slow | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen3.5 122B-A10B | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.7 tok/s | Runs wellover memory limit | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| EXAONE Deep 32B | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.6 tok/s | Slow | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.5 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Aya 23 35B | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 44/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.8 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Reka Flash 3.1 (21B) | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| DeepSeek Coder V2 Lite (16B) | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.6 tok/s | Runs great | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 76.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B-A12B | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 9.9 tok/s | Slowover memory limit | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Ling 3.0 Flash (127B-A5B) | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 22.1 tok/s | Runs wellover memory limit | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Command R+ 104B (04-2024) | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.4 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V2 Lite Chat | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.6 tok/s | Runs great | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 76.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| MiMo V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.1 tok/s | Runs well | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| SenseNova 6.8 Code2Video | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Aya Vision 32B | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.1 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| MiMo 7B RL | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.2 tok/s | Runs well | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Aya Expanse 32B | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.5 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| GLM-Z1 32B (0414) | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.4 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Qwen2.5-Math 72B Instruct | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.2 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 41/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.8 tok/s | Very slowheavy RAM offload |
| OLMo 2 32B Instruct | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.5 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| DeepCoder 14B Preview | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 tok/s | Slow | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| LFM2 8B-A1B | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.4 tok/s | Runs great | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 74.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| InternVL3 8B | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.1 tok/s | Runs well | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| InternVL3 38B | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slow | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.6 tok/s | Slowoffloads to RAM |
| InternLM2.5 20B Chat | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.3 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Qwen3 4B | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.9 tok/s | Runs well | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 52.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| North Micro Vision | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.5 tok/s | Runs great | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 62.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Codestral 22B | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.7 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Nemotron 3 Nano 4B | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 22.2 tok/s | Runs well | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| OpenHands LM 32B | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.4 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B v1 | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 tok/s | Runs well | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.4 tok/s | Runs great | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 tok/s | Slow | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| JanusCoder 14B | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 tok/s | Slow | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| LFM2.5 2.6B | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.6 tok/s | Runs great | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 57.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| MiniCPM4 8B | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.7 tok/s | Runs well | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Nemotron 3 Super 120B-A12B | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 9.9 tok/s | Slowover memory limit | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Nemotron Nano 9B v2 | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.8 tok/s | Runs well | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 4.1 3B | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 25.9 tok/s | Runs well | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Gemma 3n E4B | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 22.0 tok/s | Runs well | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 52.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| GLM-4.1V 9B Thinking | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 tok/s | Runs well | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 29.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| TMax 2B | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.6 tok/s | Runs great | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 82.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Hunyuan 7B Instruct | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.7 tok/s | Runs well | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Jamba 1.5 Mini | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.6 tok/s | Runs well | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.4 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Mage-VL-Cowork 4.7B | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.6 tok/s | Runs well | 59Good quality (B) · 59 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Nous Hermes 2 Mixtral 8x7B DPO | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.8 tok/s | Runs well | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.7 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Qwen3.5 2B | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.7 tok/s | Runs great | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 68.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.4 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.5 tok/s | Runs well | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.6 tok/s | Runs well | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| LFM2.5-VL 3B | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.2 tok/s | Runs well | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 49.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| MiniCPM-o 2.6 8B | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.1 tok/s | Runs well | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| Olmo 3 7B Instruct | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.0 tok/s | Runs well | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| LLM4Decompile 22B V2 | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow | 48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.7 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| QwQ 32B Preview | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.4 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Jamba Reasoning 3B | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 27.5 tok/s | Runs well | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Ministral 3 8B | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.7 tok/s | Runs well | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| Mixtral 8x7B Instruct | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.8 tok/s | Runs well | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.7 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.7 tok/s | Runs well | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Gemma 3n E2B | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.0 tok/s | Runs great | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 77.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| DeepSeek LLM 67B Chat | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.1 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 40/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| UI-Mate 9B | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.1 tok/s | Runs well | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| UI-Venus 2 9B | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.1 tok/s | Runs well | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| MiniCPM5 1B | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.5 tok/s | Runs great | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 66.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| Foundation-Sec 1.1 8B Instruct | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 tok/s | Runs well | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| InternVL2.5 8B | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.9 tok/s | Runs well | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| SmolLM3 3B | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.6 tok/s | Runs well | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 50.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Phi-4 Mini (3.8B) | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 22.9 tok/s | Runs well | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5 7B Instruct 1M | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.5 tok/s | Runs well | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen3 4B Thinking 2507 | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.9 tok/s | Runs well | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 52.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Falcon-H1 7B Instruct | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.6 tok/s | Runs well | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| Jamba2 3B | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 29.0 tok/s | Runs well | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 51.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| Unlimited OCR 2 (3B-A0.6B) | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 58.1 tok/s | Runs great | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 78.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Ministral 3 3B | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 22.8 tok/s | Runs well | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| GLiDE 9B | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.1 tok/s | Runs well | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen3-VL 2B Instruct | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.3 tok/s | Runs great | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 72.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| Gemma 3 4B IT | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.5 tok/s | Runs well | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 49.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen1.5 110B Chat | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 4/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.5 tok/s | Runs well | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| Hermes 3 (Llama 3.1 8B) | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 tok/s | Runs well | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Llama 3.1 8B Instruct | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 tok/s | Runs well | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Phi-3.5 Mini Instruct | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 23.0 tok/s | Runs well | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Yi 1.5 34B Chat | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.1 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| MedGemma 4B IT | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.5 tok/s | Runs well | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 49.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| Ministral 3 14B | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.8 tok/s | Runs well |
| MiniCPM-V 2.6 8B | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.9 tok/s | Runs well | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Ling 3.0 flash Sante | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 22.1 tok/s | Runs wellover memory limit | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Hunyuan 4B Instruct | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.8 tok/s | Runs well | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 50.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 4.0 Micro (3B) | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 25.9 tok/s | Runs well | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Falcon 3 10B Instruct | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 tok/s | Runs well | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 29.5 tok/s | Runs well |
| Falcon 3 7B Instruct | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.8 tok/s | Runs well | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.8 tok/s | Runs well | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 3.2 8B Instruct | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.8 tok/s | Runs well | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 3.3 8B | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.8 tok/s | Runs well | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Seed-Coder 8B Reasoning | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.7 tok/s | Runs well | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Ministral 8B (2410) | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 tok/s | Runs well | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| EXAONE 3.5 7.8B | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.2 tok/s | Runs well | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| DeepHermes 3 Llama 3 8B Preview | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 tok/s | Runs well | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Dolphin 3.0 Llama 3.1 8B | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 tok/s | Runs well | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Tülu 3 8B | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 tok/s | Runs well | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| GLM-4 9B 0414 | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.1 tok/s | Runs well | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| NorthCUA Nano | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.1 tok/s | Runs well | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Llama 2 70B Chat | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 39/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Gemma 2 9B IT | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.3 tok/s | Runs well | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Unlimited OCR (3B-A0.6B) | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 58.1 tok/s | Runs great | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 78.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| LFM2.5 1.2B Instruct | 31Basic quality (D) · 31 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 52.2 tok/s | Runs great | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 61.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Phi-3.5 Vision Instruct | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.2 tok/s | Runs well | 37Basic quality (D) · 37 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 50.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 4.0 H Micro | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 27.6 tok/s | Runs well | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| InternLM3 8B Instruct | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.9 tok/s | Runs well | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Gemma 3 12B IT | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.8 tok/s | Runs well | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 25.0 tok/s | Runs well |
| PaddleOCR-VL 1.6 0.9B | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.6 tok/s | Runs great | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 74.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| EXAONE Deep 7.8B | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.2 tok/s | Runs well | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Phi-3 Small 8K Instruct | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.9 tok/s | Runs well | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 3.1 8B Instruct | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.8 tok/s | Runs well | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Seed-Coder 8B Instruct | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.7 tok/s | Runs well | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| OLMoE 1B-7B Instruct | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.1 tok/s | Runs great | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 82.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| MiniCPM-OCR 1.0 1.3B | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.9 tok/s | Runs great | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 54.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Dolphin 2.9.4 Llama 3.1 8B | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 tok/s | Runs well | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 tok/s | Runs well | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| OpenChat 3.6 8B | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 tok/s | Runs well | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| InternVL2 8B | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.9 tok/s | Runs well | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Falcon-H1R 7B | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.6 tok/s | Runs well | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| LFM2 2.6B | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.2 tok/s | Runs great | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 60.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 23.0 tok/s | Runs well | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2 7B Instruct | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.5 tok/s | Runs well | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| EXAONE 4.0 1.2B | 29Basic quality (D) · 29 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 47.7 tok/s | Runs great | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 55.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| AFM 4.5B | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.0 tok/s | Runs well | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Command R7B | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 tok/s | Runs well | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2-VL 7B Instruct | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.6 tok/s | Runs well | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Falcon-H1 3B Instruct | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 27.9 tok/s | Runs well | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 49.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Olmo 3 7B Think | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.0 tok/s | Runs well | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Aya Vision 8B | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.2 tok/s | Runs well | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| InternLM2 Chat 20B | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.4 tok/s | Slow | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.8 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen3 1.7B | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.3 tok/s | Runs great | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 76.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5 Coder 7B Instruct | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.5 tok/s | Runs well | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen1.5 32B Chat | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.8 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| TeleOCR | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.0 tok/s | Runs great | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 50.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| GLM-4 9B Chat 1M | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.0 tok/s | Runs well | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| Llama 3.2 3B Instruct | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 27.4 tok/s | Runs well | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| LLaVA 1.6 34B | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.6 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| GLM-4 9B Chat (2024) | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.1 tok/s | Runs well | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| MiniCPM3 4B | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.6 tok/s | Runs well | 37Basic quality (D) · 37 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 51.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Phi-3 Mini 4K Instruct | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 23.0 tok/s | Runs well | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Code Llama 70B Instruct | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 36/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Mistral-NeMo-Minitron 8B Instruct | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.5 tok/s | Runs well | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Llama 3 8B Instruct | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 tok/s | Runs well | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qianfan-OCR 4B | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.6 tok/s | Runs well | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| OpenReasoning Nemotron 7B | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.5 tok/s | Runs well | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Apertus v1.5 8B | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.8 tok/s | Runs well | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| CogVLM2 Llama 3 Chat 19B | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.5 tok/s | Slow | 31Basic quality (D) · 31 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.2 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| EXAONE 3.5 2.4B | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.5 tok/s | Runs great | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 64.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Command R7B Arabic | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 tok/s | Runs well | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 4.0 H 1B | 27Basic quality (D) · 27 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.8 tok/s | Runs great | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5 3B Instruct | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.8 tok/s | Runs great | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 50.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Phi-3 Vision 128K Instruct | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.2 tok/s | Runs well | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 50.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| DeepSeek MoE 16B Chat | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.9 tok/s | Runs great | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 79.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Raon 1 nano | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 24.9 tok/s | Runs well | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 3.2 2B Instruct | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.8 tok/s | Runs great | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 61.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 3.3 2B | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.8 tok/s | Runs great | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 61.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Foundation-Sec 8B Reasoning | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 tok/s | Runs well | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| InternLM2.5 7B Chat | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.4 tok/s | Runs well | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5-Omni 7B | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.6 tok/s | Runs well | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| Aya Expanse 8B | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 tok/s | Runs well | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Apertus 8B Instruct | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.9 tok/s | Runs well | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| Phi-4 Mini Reasoning (3.8B) | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 22.9 tok/s | Runs well | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| S5 nano | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.9 tok/s | Runs well | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Voxtral Mini 3B | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.8 tok/s | Runs well | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 3.0 8B Instruct | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.8 tok/s | Runs well | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Hermes 3 Llama 3.2 3B | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.4 tok/s | Runs great | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| GLM-Z1 9B (0414) | 48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.1 tok/s | Runs well | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| LightOnOCR-3 4B | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.4 tok/s | Runs well | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Mistral Nemo 12B Instruct | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.8 tok/s | Runs well | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 25.0 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen1.5 MoE A2.7B Chat | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.1 tok/s | Runs great | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 70.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen3.5 0.8B | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 51.5 tok/s | Runs great | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 82.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5-VL 3B Instruct | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 23.5 tok/s | Runs well | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Falcon-H1 1.5B Instruct | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.4 tok/s | Runs great | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| LFM2 1.2B | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 52.2 tok/s | Runs great | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 61.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Yi 34B Chat | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.1 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Granite 3.1 2B Instruct | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.8 tok/s | Runs great | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 61.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.1 tok/s | Runs well | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| WeVisOne VL 2B | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.0 tok/s | Runs great | 27Basic quality (D) · 27 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 63.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 tok/s | Runs well | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Zamba2 7B Instruct | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.9 tok/s | Runs well | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Chandra OCR 2 | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.6 tok/s | Runs well | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Dolphin 2.9 Llama 3 8B | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 tok/s | Runs well | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Gemma 2 2B | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.7 tok/s | Runs great | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Pixtral 12B (2409) | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.6 tok/s | Runs well | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 24.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| EXAONE 3.0 7.8B Instruct | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.2 tok/s | Runs well | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Fara 7B | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.6 tok/s | Runs well | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| OLMo 2 7B Instruct | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.0 tok/s | Runs well | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.7 tok/s | Runs well | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.5 tok/s | Runs well |
| Falcon 3 3B Instruct | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.2 tok/s | Runs great | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Falcon3 Mamba 7B Instruct | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.1 tok/s | Runs well | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Ministral 3 14B Reasoning | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.8 tok/s | Runs well |
| SmolVLM2 2.2B Instruct | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.1 tok/s | Runs great | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 68.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5 1.5B Instruct | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.6 tok/s | Runs great | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| WeVisOne-VL 4B | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.2 tok/s | Runs well | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| LFM2-VL 1.6B | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.0 tok/s | Runs great | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Hermes 2 Pro Mistral 7B | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.1 tok/s | Runs well | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Starling LM 7B Beta | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.1 tok/s | Runs well | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2-VL 2B Instruct | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.8 tok/s | Runs great | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 70.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 3.1 3B-A800M Instruct | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.1 tok/s | Runs great | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 64.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 3.0 2B Instruct | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.4 tok/s | Runs great | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 58.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| OpenChat 3.5 (0106) | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.1 tok/s | Runs well | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| SmolVLM 2.2B Instruct | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.1 tok/s | Runs great | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 68.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Mistral Large 2.1 (2411) | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.0 tok/s | Very slowover memory limit | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Nous Hermes 2 SOLAR 10.7B | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.6 tok/s | Runs well | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| SOLAR 10.7B Instruct | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.6 tok/s | Runs well | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| Granite Vision 3.2 2B | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.2 tok/s | Runs great | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 52.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Hunyuan 1.8B Instruct | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.6 tok/s | Runs great | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 86.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Llama 3.2 1B Instruct | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 49.2 tok/s | Runs great | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 57.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| OLMo 2 13B Instruct | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.5 tok/s | Runs well | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 22.2 tok/s | Runs well |
| Phi-3 Medium 128K Instruct | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.3 tok/s | Runs well | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.8 tok/s | Runs well |
| Mistral 7B Instruct v0.2 | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.1 tok/s | Runs well | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Nous Hermes 2 Mistral 7B DPO | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.1 tok/s | Runs well | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| OpenChat 3.5 (1210) | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.1 tok/s | Runs well | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| SmolLM2 1.7B Instruct | 19Basic quality (D) · 19 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.5 tok/s | Runs great | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| Aya 23 8B | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 tok/s | Runs well | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.5 tok/s | Runs well | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Phi-3 Medium (14B) | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.3 tok/s | Runs well | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.8 tok/s | Runs well |
| Mistral Large 2 (123B) | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.0 tok/s | Very slowover memory limit | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Pixtral Large 124B (2411) | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.0 tok/s | Very slowover memory limit | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Granite 3.0 3B-A800M Instruct | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.1 tok/s | Runs great | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 64.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Gemma 3 1B | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.8 tok/s | Runs great | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 71.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| OpenHermes 2.5 Mistral 7B | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.1 tok/s | Runs well | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Starling LM 7B Alpha | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.1 tok/s | Runs well | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Yi 1.5 9B Chat | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.9 tok/s | Runs well | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| DeepSeek Prover V2 7B | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.7 tok/s | Runs well | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| Zamba2 2.7B Instruct | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.7 tok/s | Runs great | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 58.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.5 tok/s | Runs well | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 50.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5-Omni 3B | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.9 tok/s | Runs well | 29Basic quality (D) · 29 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| DeepSeek Coder 33B Instruct | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.9 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Qwen1.5 14B Chat | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.2 tok/s | Runs well | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 27.8 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| InternLM2.5 1.8B Chat | 17Basic quality (D) · 17 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.5 tok/s | Runs great | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 82.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| LFM2 700M | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 60.5 tok/s | Runs great | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 96.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Mistral 7B Instruct v0.1 | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.1 tok/s | Runs well | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Gemma 1.1 7B IT | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.3 tok/s | Runs well | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| RecurrentGemma 9B IT | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.8 tok/s | Runs well | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 31.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Falcon Mamba 7B Instruct | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.1 tok/s | Runs well | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen1.5 7B Chat | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.4 tok/s | Runs well | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| InternLM2 Math Plus 20B | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.4 tok/s | Slow | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.8 tok/s | Runs well |
| GLiDE 2B | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.8 tok/s | Runs great | 17Basic quality (D) · 17 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 82.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Falcon 3 1B Instruct | 15Basic quality (D) · 15 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.5 tok/s | Runs great | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| CodeGeeX4 All 9B | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.1 tok/s | Runs well | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2 1.5B Instruct | 15Basic quality (D) · 15 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.6 tok/s | Runs great | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Yi 1.5 6B Chat | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.5 tok/s | Runs well | 27Basic quality (D) · 27 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Neural Chat 7B v3.3 | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.1 tok/s | Runs well | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Spark X2.6 1.7B | 15Basic quality (D) · 15 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.5 tok/s | Runs great | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| Gemma 7B IT | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.3 tok/s | Runs well | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| LLaVA 1.6 Mistral 7B | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.6 tok/s | Runs well | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Devstral 2 (123B) | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.0 tok/s | Very slowover memory limit | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| StableLM Zephyr 3B | 13Basic quality (D) · 13 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.6 tok/s | Runs great | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 55.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5 Coder 1.5B Instruct | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.6 tok/s | Runs great | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| StarCoder2 15B Instruct | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.5 tok/s | Slow | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen3 0.6B | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.7 tok/s | Runs great | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 95.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| DeepScaleR 1.5B Preview | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.8 tok/s | Runs great | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| OLMo 2 1B Instruct | 13Basic quality (D) · 13 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.2 tok/s | Runs great | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Phi-2 2.7B | 13Basic quality (D) · 13 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.9 tok/s | Runs great | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 55.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| SmolLM 1.7B Instruct | 13Basic quality (D) · 13 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.5 tok/s | Runs great | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct | 15Basic quality (D) · 15 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.5 tok/s | Runs great | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 50.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Zephyr 7B Beta | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.1 tok/s | Runs well | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| DeepSeek Coder 6.7B Instruct | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.0 tok/s | Runs well | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite Code 34B Instruct | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.8 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| LFM2.5 350M | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.0 tok/s | Runs great | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 204 tok/s | Runs great |
| Falcon-H1 0.5B Instruct | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 86.1 tok/s | Runs great | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 137 tok/s | Runs great |
| Code Llama 34B Instruct | 31Basic quality (D) · 31 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 45/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.4 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| CodeGemma 7B | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.3 tok/s | Runs well | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| LFM2-VL 450M | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.9 tok/s | Runs great | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 159 tok/s | Runs great |
| LLM4Decompile 6.7B V2 | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.0 tok/s | Runs well | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Yi Coder 9B Chat | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.9 tok/s | Runs well | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| LFM2 350M | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.0 tok/s | Runs great | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 204 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 4.0 H 350M | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 60.7 tok/s | Runs great | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 210 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite Code 20B Instruct | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.4 tok/s | Slow | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| Codestral Mamba 7B | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.1 tok/s | Runs well | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5-Math 7B Instruct | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.5 tok/s | Runs well | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Orca 2 7B | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.9 tok/s | Runs well | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Orca 2 13B | 19Basic quality (D) · 19 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.1 tok/s | Runs well | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| GLiDE 0.8B | 11Basic quality (D) · 11 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.7 tok/s | Runs great | 11Basic quality (D) · 11 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 95.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.8 tok/s | Runs great | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| StableLM 2 1.6B Chat | 9Basic quality (D) · 9 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.3 tok/s | Runs great | 10Basic quality (D) · 10 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| StableLM 2 Zephyr 1.6B | 9Basic quality (D) · 9 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.3 tok/s | Runs great | 10Basic quality (D) · 10 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Mathstral 7B | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.1 tok/s | Runs well | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Gemma 2B IT | 10Basic quality (D) · 10 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.3 tok/s | Runs great | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 61.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| SmolVLM 500M Instruct | 10Basic quality (D) · 10 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.5 tok/s | Runs great | 10Basic quality (D) · 10 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 140 tok/s | Runs great |
| LLM4Decompile 9B V2 | 31Basic quality (D) · 31 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.9 tok/s | Runs well | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5 0.5B Instruct | 10Basic quality (D) · 10 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.1 tok/s | Runs great | 10Basic quality (D) · 10 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 146 tok/s | Runs great |
| SQLCoder 7B v2 | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.0 tok/s | Runs well | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| LFM2.5 230M | 10Basic quality (D) · 10 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 89.7 tok/s | Runs great | 10Basic quality (D) · 10 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 311 tok/s | Runs great |
| Llama 2 13B Chat | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.1 tok/s | Runs well | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Baichuan 2 13B Chat | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Llama 2 7B Chat | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.9 tok/s | Runs well | 19Basic quality (D) · 19 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| d1 2B | 19Basic quality (D) · 19 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.8 tok/s | Runs great | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 80.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5-Math 1.5B Instruct | 19Basic quality (D) · 19 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.6 tok/s | Runs great | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| StableLM 2 12B Chat | 19Basic quality (D) · 19 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.9 tok/s | Runs well | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Stable Code Instruct 3B | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.6 tok/s | Runs great | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 55.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Baichuan 2 7B Chat | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.1 tok/s | Runs well | 19Basic quality (D) · 19 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Hunyuan 0.5B Instruct | 8Basic quality (D) · 8 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 82.9 tok/s | Runs great | 8Basic quality (D) · 8 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 132 tok/s | Runs great |
| InternLM2 Math Plus 7B | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.4 tok/s | Runs well | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite Code 8B Instruct (128K) | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.9 tok/s | Runs well | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| SmolLM2 360M Instruct | 8Basic quality (D) · 8 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 57.3 tok/s | Runs great | 8Basic quality (D) · 8 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 198 tok/s | Runs great |
| Yi 6B Chat | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 23.8 tok/s | Runs well | 19Basic quality (D) · 19 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| StarCoder2 15B (base) | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.5 tok/s | Slow | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| DeepSeek LLM 7B Chat | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.9 tok/s | Runs well | 17Basic quality (D) · 17 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| WizardLM 13B v1.2 | 15Basic quality (D) · 15 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.1 tok/s | Runs well | 15Basic quality (D) · 15 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| LLaVA 1.5 13B | 15Basic quality (D) · 15 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.8 tok/s | Runs well | 15Basic quality (D) · 15 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Yi Coder 1.5B Chat | 15Basic quality (D) · 15 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.2 tok/s | Runs great | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| TinyLlama 1.1B Chat | 6Basic quality (D) · 6 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.7 tok/s | Runs great | 6Basic quality (D) · 6 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 64.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2 0.5B Instruct | 6Basic quality (D) · 6 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.1 tok/s | Runs great | 6Basic quality (D) · 6 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 146 tok/s | Runs great |
| ERNIE 4.5 0.3B | 6Basic quality (D) · 6 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 57.3 tok/s | Runs great | 6Basic quality (D) · 6 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 198 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite Code 3B Instruct (128K) | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.5 tok/s | Runs great | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| SmolVLM 256M Instruct | 6Basic quality (D) · 6 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 79.4 tok/s | Runs great | 6Basic quality (D) · 6 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 275 tok/s | Runs great |
| Gemma 3 270M | 6Basic quality (D) · 6 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 76.4 tok/s | Runs great | 6Basic quality (D) · 6 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 265 tok/s | Runs great |
| LLaVA 1.5 7B | 11Basic quality (D) · 11 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.5 tok/s | Runs well | 15Basic quality (D) · 15 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| Vicuna 13B v1.5 | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.1 tok/s | Runs well | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| SmolLM 360M Instruct | 5Basic quality (D) · 5 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 57.3 tok/s | Runs great | 5Basic quality (D) · 5 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 198 tok/s | Runs great |
| Vicuna 7B v1.5 | 9Basic quality (D) · 9 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.4 tok/s | Runs well | 13Basic quality (D) · 13 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Code Llama 13B Instruct | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.1 tok/s | Runs well | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Code Llama 7B Instruct | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.0 tok/s | Runs well | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| surya ocr 2.5 | 15Basic quality (D) · 15 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 64.9 tok/s | Runs great | 15Basic quality (D) · 15 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 104 tok/s | Runs great |
| StarCoder2 3B | 15Basic quality (D) · 15 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.5 tok/s | Runs great | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 51.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| SmolLM2 135M Instruct | 4Basic quality (D) · 4 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 159 tok/s | Runs great | 4Basic quality (D) · 4 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 549 tok/s | Runs great |
| OLMo 7B Instruct | 9Basic quality (D) · 9 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.0 tok/s | Runs well | 13Basic quality (D) · 13 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| WizardMath 7B v1.1 | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.1 tok/s | Runs well | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Falcon 40B Instruct | 11Basic quality (D) · 11 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 11Basic quality (D) · 11 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 42/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.6 tok/s | Slowoffloads to RAM |
| DeepSeek Coder 1.3B Instruct | 11Basic quality (D) · 11 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.2 tok/s | Runs great | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 52.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| LLM4Decompile 1.3B V2 | 11Basic quality (D) · 11 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.2 tok/s | Runs great | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 52.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Falcon-H1 Tiny 90M Instruct | 3Basic quality (D) · 3 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 229 tok/s | Runs great | 3Basic quality (D) · 3 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 794 tok/s | Runs great |
| SmolLM 135M Instruct | 2Basic quality (D) · 2 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 159 tok/s | Runs great | 2Basic quality (D) · 2 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 549 tok/s | Runs great |
| InternLM 7B | 8Basic quality (D) · 8 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.7 tok/s | Runs well | 11Basic quality (D) · 11 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| CodeGemma 2B | 11Basic quality (D) · 11 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.3 tok/s | Runs great | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 61.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| StarCoder 15B | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.6 tok/s | Slow | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 24.9 tok/s | Runs well |
| StarCoder2 7B | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.3 tok/s | Runs well | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5 Coder 0.5B Instruct | 8Basic quality (D) · 8 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 46/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.1 tok/s | Runs great | 8Basic quality (D) · 8 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 146 tok/s | Runs great |
| Falcon 7B Instruct | 4Basic quality (D) · 4 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 45/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.0 tok/s | Runs well | 5Basic quality (D) · 5 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| gpt-oss 120B | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Kimi K3.1 Pro (2.8T) | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (552B-A16B) | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| GLM-5.3 (753B-A40B) | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen3.8 Max (2.4T-A95B) | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Kimi K3 (2.8T) | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| LongCat 2.5 (1.6T-A48B) | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiMo V2.6 Pro (1T-A42B) | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 (560B-A25B) | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiniMax M3.1 Flash (428B-A23B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Nex N2.6 (321B-A18B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Step 5 Preview (600B-A27B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| GLM-5.3 Flash (320B-A18B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiMo V2.6 Flash (310B-A15B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (552B-A16B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Mistral Large 4 (1T-A52B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen3.8 Flash Next (125B-A6B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| GLM-5.2 (753B-A40B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Hunyuan Hy4 Preview (780B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Muse Spark Open (816B-A42B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.6T-A49B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Kimi K2.6 (1T) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Ling 3.1 Flash (560B-A25B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiMo V2.5 Pro (1T-A42B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Intern-S2 (397B-A17B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| GLM-5.1 (744B-A40B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Nex N2 Pro (397B-A17B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro (April 2026) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Naive N0.5 Flash (309B-A15.5B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen3.5 397B-A17B | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiniMax M3 (427B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| GLM-5 (744B-A40B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| K2-Horizon (375B-A23B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Hunyuan Hy3 (295B-A21B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Beam 1.0 (501B-A23B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Kimi K2.5 (1T) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Kimi K2.7 Code (1T) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash (284B-A13B) | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiMo V2.5 (310B-A15B) | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Ornith 1.5 397B-A17B | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V3.2 (671B) | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Inkling Small (276B-A12B) | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| GLM-4.7 (355B-A32B) | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Inkling (975B-A41B) | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiniMax M2.7 (230B-A10B) | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Step 3.7 Flash (198B-A11B) | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek R1 0528 (671B) | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Kimi K2 Thinking (1T) | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V3.2 Exp | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Ling 2.6 1T | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiniMax M2.5 (230B-A10B) | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek R1 (671B) | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash (April 2026) | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Step 3.5 Flash (196B-A11B) | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V3.1 (671B) | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 (1T) | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiniMax M2.1 (230B-A10B) | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen3 Coder 480B-A35B | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiMo V2 Flash (309B-A15B) | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Ling 1T | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Mistral Large 3 (675B) | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Solar Open 2 250B | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Kimi K2 Instruct (July 2025) | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiniMax M2 (230B-A10B) | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Instruct | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Command A+ (218B-A25B) | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| K-EXAONE 236B-A23B | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| LongCat Flash Chat (560B) | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen3 235B-A22B | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| InternVL3.5 241B-A28B | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Baichuan M3 235B-A22B | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| GLM-4.6 (355B-A32B) | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V3 0324 (671B) | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiniMax-M1 80K | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| GLM-4.5 (355B-A32B) | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiniMax-M1 40K | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Mistral Medium 3.5 (128B) | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Trinity Large Thinking (400B-A13B) | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| ERNIE 4.5 300B-A47B | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Hermes 4 405B | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| NorthCUA Pro | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| dots.llm1 Instruct | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiniMax-Text-01 | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Tülu 3 405B | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V3 (671B) | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek Coder V2 (236B) | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek Coder V2 Instruct (0614) | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V2.5 1210 | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Llama 3.1 405B Instruct | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Llama 4 Maverick (17B x 128E) | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V2.5 | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Jamba 1.5 Large | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V2 Chat | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 5/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 5/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Mixtral 8x22B Instruct | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 5/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 5/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Grok-1 (314B) | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 4/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 4/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Snowflake Arctic Instruct | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 4/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 4/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Falcon 180B Chat | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 3/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 3/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
Image models
61 of 61 image models run on the AMD Ryzen 7000 series (desktop, incl. PRO 7645 / 7745) NAS (64 GB). 54.4 GB usable for models.
55 of 61 image models run on the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT. 16.0 GB usable for models.
| Model | QualityRyzen 7000 series (desktop, incl. PRO 7645 / 7745) NAS | SpeedRyzen 7000 series (desktop, incl. PRO 7645 / 7745) NAS | RunsRyzen 7000 series (desktop, incl. PRO 7645 / 7745) NAS | QualityRX 7600 XT | SpeedRX 7600 XT | RunsRX 7600 XT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Krea 2 Turbo | 92Excellent quality (A+) · 92 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 min | Very slow | 92Excellent quality (A+) · 92 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13 s | Runs greatCPU offload |
| FLUX.2 [klein] 9B | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.6 min | Slow | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.1 s | Runs greatencoder in RAM |
| Qwen-Image 2.1 | 92Excellent quality (A+) · 92 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 61.8 min | Very slow | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen-Image 2512 | 89Excellent quality (A+) · 89 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.5 h | Very slow | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 min | Very slowCPU offload |
| ERNIE-Image | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.7 min | Very slow | 81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 62 s | Slowtight fit |
| Fibo 2.0 Dev | 93Excellent quality (A+) · 93 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.1 min | Very slow | 93Excellent quality (A+) · 93 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 69 s | SlowCPU offload |
| Qwen-Image 2.1 Turbo | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.9 min | Very slow | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Ideogram 4 | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.1 min | Very slow | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at NF4, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 68 s | Slowencoder in RAM |
| Ming-Image 0.1 Design | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.1 min | Very slow | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen-Image | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 72.5 min | Very slow | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 min | Very slowCPU offload |
| FireRed-Image-Edit 1.1 | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 82.3 min | Very slow | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.7 min | Very slowCPU offload |
| FLUX.1 Krea [dev] | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.7 min | Very slow | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34 s | Runs welltight fit |
| Qwen-Image-Edit 2511 | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 82.3 min | Very slow | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.7 min | Very slowCPU offload |
| FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.7 min | Very slow | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 62 s | Slowtight fit |
| FLUX 3 Image Klein | 91Excellent quality (A+) · 91 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.1 min | Very slow | 89Excellent quality (A+) · 89 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12 s | Runs great |
| HiDream-I1 Full | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.3 min | Very slow | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at NF4, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.0 min | Slowencoder in RAM |
| MiniMax H3 Image | 91Excellent quality (A+) · 91 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.5 min | Very slowencoder unloaded after use | 91Excellent quality (A+) · 91 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| ERNIE-Image Turbo | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.9 min | Very slow | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.7 s | Runs welltight fit |
| FLUX.1 [dev] | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.7 min | Very slow | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at NF4, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 31 s | Runs welltight fit |
| FLUX.2 [dev] | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.7 min | Very slowtight fit | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.7 min | Slowtight fit · CPU offload |
| HiDream-I1 Dev | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.5 min | Very slow | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at NF4, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46 s | Slowencoder in RAM |
| FLUX.1 [schnell] | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.8 min | Slow | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.7 s | Runs welltight fit |
| MOSS-Image SFT | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.5 min | Very slow | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35 s | Runs wellencoder in RAM |
| FLUX.1 Fill [dev] | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.2 min | Very slow | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28 s | Runs welltight fit · encoder in RAM |
| HiDream-I1 Fast | 75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.3 min | Very slow | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at NF4, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 27 s | Runs wellencoder in RAM |
| Chroma1-HD | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.9 min | Very slow | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at NF4, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 52 s | Slow |
| FLUX.2 [klein] 4B | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 54 s | Slow | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.7 s | Runs great |
| Z-Image | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.2 min | Very slow | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36 s | Runs well |
| CogView4 6B | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.1 min | Very slow | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40 s | Slowencoder in RAM |
| Z-Image Turbo | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.0 min | Slow | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 92/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.8 s | Runs great |
| Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 86 s | Slow | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.5 s | Runs great |
| Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 9.8 min | Very slow | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 31 s | Runs well |
| HunyuanImage 3.0 (80B-A13B) | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 62.8 min | Very slowCPU offload | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Iris-3B | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.3 min | Very slow | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40 s | Runs wellencoder in RAM |
| Cosmos3-Super Text2Image (64B) | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.9 min | Very slowCPU offload | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| OmniGen2 | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.3 min | Very slow | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34 s | Runs well |
| Kolors | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.6 min | Very slow | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.5 s | Runs great |
| Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.4 min | Very slow | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13 s | Runs great |
| SDXL Turbo | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.1 s | Runs great | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 s | Runs great |
| SDXL-Lightning (4-step) | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38 s | Runs well | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.7 s | Runs great |
| Lumina-Image 2.0 | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.3 min | Very slow | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15 s | Runs well |
| AuraFlow v0.3 | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.5 min | Very slow | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30 s | Runs well |
| DreamShaper XL v2 Turbo | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 70 s | Slow | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 s | Runs great |
| Juggernaut XL v9 | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.0 min | Very slow | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11 s | Runs great |
| RealVisXL V5.0 | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.0 min | Very slow | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11 s | Runs great |
| Kandinsky 3 | 48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.1 min | Very slow | 48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 22 s | Runs wellencoder in RAM |
| Stable Diffusion 3 Medium | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.8 min | Very slow | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.6 s | Runs great |
| Animagine XL 4.0 | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 min | Very slow | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 9.9 s | Runs great |
| Illustrious XL v0.1 | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 min | Very slow | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 9.9 s | Runs great |
| PixArt-Σ XL 1024 | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 81 s | Slow | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 s | Runs great |
| Pony Diffusion V6 XL | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 min | Very slow | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 9.0 s | Runs great |
| Playground v2.5 | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.7 min | Very slow | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16 s | Runs well |
| Stable Cascade | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.5 min | Very slow | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11 s | Runs great |
| Animagine XL 3.1 | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 min | Very slow | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 9.9 s | Runs great |
| Stable Diffusion XL 1.0 | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.0 min | Very slow | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11 s | Runs great |
| Hunyuan-DiT v1.2 | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.4 min | Very slow | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14 s | Runs well |
| SD Turbo | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.3 s | Runs great | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.2 s | Runs great |
| LCM DreamShaper v7 | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13 s | Runs well | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.6 s | Runs great |
| Realistic Vision V5.1 | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 64 s | Slow | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.8 s | Runs great |
| DreamShaper 8 | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 64 s | Slow | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.8 s | Runs great |
| Stable Diffusion 1.5 | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 64 s | Slow | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.8 s | Runs great |
Video models
42 of 43 video models run on the AMD Ryzen 7000 series (desktop, incl. PRO 7645 / 7745) NAS (64 GB). 54.4 GB usable for models.
17 of 43 video models run on the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT. 16.0 GB usable for models.
| Model | QualityRyzen 7000 series (desktop, incl. PRO 7645 / 7745) NAS | SpeedRyzen 7000 series (desktop, incl. PRO 7645 / 7745) NAS | RunsRyzen 7000 series (desktop, incl. PRO 7645 / 7745) NAS | QualityRX 7600 XT | SpeedRX 7600 XT | RunsRX 7600 XT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTX-2.5 (22B, video + audio) | 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.6 h | Very slowtight fit | 81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| LTX-2.3 | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.9 h | Very slow | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Bernini-R A14B (video generation + editing) | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.7 h | Very slow | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.2 min | SlowCPU offload |
| Wan 2.2 I2V A14B | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 27.4 h | Very slow | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Wan 2.2 T2V A14B | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 27.4 h | Very slow | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| LTX-2 (19B, video + audio) | 81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.9 h | Very slow | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| HunyuanVideo 1.5 (8.3B) | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 24.2 h | Very slow | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiniMax H3 (33B, video + audio) | 89Excellent quality (A+) · 89 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.7 h | Very slowencoder unloaded after use | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| HY-OmniWeaving (8.3B, unified video) | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.9 h | Very slow | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 27.1 min | SlowCPU offload |
| Wan 2.2 Animate 14B | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.6 h | Very slow | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Wan 2.1 I2V 14B 720P | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.3 h | Very slow | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Wan 2.1 T2V 14B | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.3 h | Very slow | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Wan 2.1 VACE 14B | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.7 h | Very slow | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| SkyReels V2 T2V 14B 720P | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.2 h | Very slow | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| SCAIL-2 14B (character animation) | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.1 h | Very slow | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 55.3 min | Very slowCPU offload |
| Wan 2.2 TI2V 5B | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.8 h | Very slow | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| HunyuanVideo 13B | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.2 h | Very slow | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| HunyuanVideo I2V 13B | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.2 h | Very slow | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Wan 2.2 S2V 14B (speech to video) | 75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.2 h | Very slow | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.0 min | Very slowCPU offload |
| Step-Video T2V (30B) | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.6 h | Very slowtight fit | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Open-Sora 2.0 (11B) | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.8 h | Very slow | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Cosmos-Predict2 14B Video2World | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.5 h | Very slow | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| LTX-Video 13B 0.9.8 (distilled) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.3 min | Very slow | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| FramePack I2V (HunyuanVideo 13B) | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.4 h | Very slow | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.4 min | SlowCPU offload |
| SkyReels V2 T2V 14B 540P | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.8 h | Very slow | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 64.5 min | Very slowtight fit · CPU offload |
| Kandinsky 6.0 Video Lite (3B, video + audio) | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.6 h | Very slow | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.8 min | Slowtight fit · encoder in RAM |
| Wan 2.1 I2V 14B 480P | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.4 h | Very slow | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.6 min | Very slowtight fit · encoder in RAM |
| Mochi 1 Preview (10B) | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.4 h | Very slow | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 50.7 min | Very slowtight fit · CPU offload |
| CogVideoX 1.5 5B | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.1 h | Very slow | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Cosmos-Predict2 2B Video2World | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.7 h | Very slow | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Wan-Dancer 14B (music to dance) | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 62.0 h | Very slowtight fit · encoder unloaded after use | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Cosmos 1.0 Diffusion 7B Text2World | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.2 h | Very slowtight fit | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Allegro (2.8B) | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.9 h | Very slow | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Kandinsky 6.0 Pro (29B, video + audio) | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 57.0 h | Very slowCPU offload | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| CogVideoX 5B I2V | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.7 h | Very slow | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.4 min | Runs welltight fit |
| CogVideoX 5B | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.7 h | Very slow | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.4 min | Runs welltight fit |
| Wan 2.1 VACE 1.3B | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.9 h | Very slow | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 9.2 min | Runs welltight fit |
| LTX-Video 2B | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 22.4 min | Slow | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53 s | Runs great |
| SkyReels V2 Diffusion Forcing 1.3B | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.5 h | Very slow | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.2 min | Runs wellencoder in RAM |
| Wan 2.1 T2V 1.3B | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.6 h | Very slow | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.5 min | Runs well |
| CogVideoX 2B | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53.7 min | Very slow | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.1 min | Runs great |
| AnimateDiff v3 (SD 1.5) | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.9 min | Slow | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 47 s | Runs great |
| Cosmos3-Super Image2Video (64B) | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
Decision models
69 of 70 decision models run on the AMD Ryzen 7000 series (desktop, incl. PRO 7645 / 7745) NAS (64 GB). 54.4 GB usable for models.
68 of 70 decision models run on the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT. 16.0 GB usable for models.
| Model | QualityRyzen 7000 series (desktop, incl. PRO 7645 / 7745) NAS | SpeedRyzen 7000 series (desktop, incl. PRO 7645 / 7745) NAS | RunsRyzen 7000 series (desktop, incl. PRO 7645 / 7745) NAS | QualityRX 7600 XT | SpeedRX 7600 XT | RunsRX 7600 XT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenAI Privacy Filter | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41 ms | Runs great | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.6 ms | Runs great |
| Llama Prompt Guard 2 22M | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 95 ms | Runs great | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.6 ms | Runs great |
| GLiNER2.5 Decide | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 318 ms | Runs well | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 9.6 ms | Runs great |
| Jina Reranker v3.5 | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 725 ms | Slow | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 23 ms | Runs great |
| Jina Reranker v3 | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 725 ms | Slow | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 92/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 23 ms | Runs great |
| GLiClass Base v3 | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 126 ms | Runs great | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.2 ms | Runs great |
| Qwen3 Reranker 4B | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.8 s | Very slow | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 95/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 104 ms | Runs great |
| GLiClass ModernBERT Large v3 | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 260 ms | Runs well | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.6 ms | Runs great |
| DeBERTa v3 Base Zero-shot v2.0 | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 119 ms | Runs great | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.1 ms | Runs great |
| FRIDA-Decisions | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 530 ms | Slow | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13 ms | Runs great |
| GTE Reranker ModernBERT Base | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 196 ms | Runs well | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.4 ms | Runs great |
| Llama Prompt Guard 2 86M | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 363 ms | Runs well | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10 ms | Runs great |
| Qwen3 Reranker 8B | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 9.8 s | Very slow | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 207 ms | Runs well |
| zerank-2 | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.8 s | Very slow | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 94/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 104 ms | Runs great |
| Skywork Reward V2 Llama 3.1 8B | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.2 s | Very slow | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 303 ms | Runs well |
| Qwen3 Reranker 0.6B | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 725 ms | Slow | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 23 ms | Runs great |
| GLiNER2 Base v1 | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 139 ms | Runs well | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.4 ms | Runs great |
| Granite Embedding Reranker English R2 | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 196 ms | Runs well | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.4 ms | Runs great |
| DeBERTa v3 Large Zero-shot v2.0 | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 286 ms | Runs well | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 9.0 ms | Runs great |
| Shieldstral 1.0 3B | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.6 s | Very slow | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 99 ms | Runs great |
| ModernBERT Large Zero-shot v2.0 | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 260 ms | Runs well | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.6 ms | Runs great |
| Intern-Decision 4B | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.8 s | Very slow | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 92/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 75 ms | Runs great |
| mxbai-rerank-large v2 | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.9 s | Very slow | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 54 ms | Runs great |
| mxbai-rerank-base v2 | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 593 ms | Slow | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20 ms | Runs great |
| d1 3B | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.9 s | Very slow | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 76 ms | Runs great |
| GLiDE 27B | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.7 s | Very slow | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| GLiGuard 300M | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 273 ms | Runs well | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.8 ms | Runs great |
| Laya | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 273 ms | Runs well | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.8 ms | Runs great |
| ProtectAI DeBERTa v3 Prompt Injection v2 | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 235 ms | Runs well | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.1 ms | Runs great |
| Jina Reranker v2 Base Multilingual | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 363 ms | Runs well | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10 ms | Runs great |
| zerank-1 small | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.1 s | Very slow | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 60 ms | Runs great |
| Skywork Reward V2 Qwen3 8B | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.4 s | Very slow | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 305 ms | Runs well |
| LemonDecider 4B | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.9 s | Very slow | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 56 ms | Runs great |
| ms-marco MiniLM L6 v2 | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38 ms | Runs great | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.5 ms | Runs great |
| DuoGuard 0.5B | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 632 ms | Slow | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15 ms | Runs great |
| BGE Reranker v2 M3 | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 735 ms | Slow | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17 ms | Runs great |
| BGE Reranker v2 Gemma | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 s | Very slow | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 85 ms | Runs great |
| Laya Multilingual | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 209 ms | Runs well | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.7 ms | Runs great |
| Qwen3Guard Gen 8B | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.8 s | Very slow | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 387 ms | Runs well |
| GLiNER Multi v2.1 | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 190 ms | Runs well | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.3 ms | Runs great |
| Qwen3Guard Gen 4B | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.8 s | Very slow | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 210 ms | Runs well |
| HHEM 2.1 Open | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 286 ms | Runs well | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 9.0 ms | Runs great |
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron Safety Guard 8B v3 | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.6 s | Very slow | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 379 ms | Runs well |
| Granite Guardian 4.1 8B | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 s | Very slow | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 395 ms | Runs well |
| Skywork Reward V2 Qwen3 0.6B | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.5 s | Very slow | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 31 ms | Runs great |
| Qwen3Guard Gen 0.6B | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 989 ms | Slow | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 81 ms | Runs great |
| WildGuard 7B | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 9.5 s | Very slow | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 343 ms | Runs well |
| NuExtract 2.0 4B | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.2 s | Very slow | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 396 ms | Runs well |
| Granite Guardian 3.3 8B | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.7 s | Very slow | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 386 ms | Runs well |
| BART Large MNLI | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 267 ms | Runs well | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.7 ms | Runs great |
| CompassJudger-2 32B | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 187.1 s | Very slow | 81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30.7 s | Very slowoffloads to RAM |
| NuExtract 2.0 2B | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.5 s | Very slow | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 198 ms | Runs well |
| LettuceDetect Large | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.0 s | Slow | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 22 ms | Runs great |
| DynaGuard 8B | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.9 s | Very slow | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.6 s | Very slow |
| Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.4 s | Very slow | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 s | Very slow |
| Selene 1 Mini 8B | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.9 s | Very slow | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.1 s | Very slow |
| gpt-oss-safeguard 20B | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.9 s | Very slow | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.4 s | Very slowtight fit |
| ShieldGemma 27B | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.7 s | Very slow | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 817 ms | Slowoffloads to RAM |
| ShieldGemma 9B | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.1 s | Very slow | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 217 ms | Runs well |
| CompassJudger-2 7B | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.5 s | Very slow | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.7 s | Very slow |
| Llama Guard 3 8B | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.6 s | Very slow | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 379 ms | Runs well |
| ShieldGemma 2B | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 s | Very slow | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 88 ms | Runs great |
| DynaGuard 1.7B | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 9.7 s | Very slow | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.3 s | Slow |
| Llama Guard 4 12B | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.8 s | Very slow | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 565 ms | Slow |
| Prometheus 2 8x7B | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 62.7 s | Very slow | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 46/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.9 s | Very slowheavy RAM offload |
| Llama Guard 3 1B | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.0 s | Very slow | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 90 ms | Runs great |
| Prometheus 2 7B | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.3 s | Very slow | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.3 s | Very slow |
| GLIDER | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.8 s | Very slow | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.9 s | Very slow |
| Flow Judge v0.1 | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.8 s | Very slow | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.9 s | Very slow |
| gpt-oss-safeguard 120B | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.