AMD Ryzen Embedded V1500B NAS (64 GB) vs Intel Arc A380 for local AI
Pick two to four systems or devices to see which runs more models, faster, for the kind of work you do.
Winner: AMD Ryzen Embedded V1500B NAS (64 GB)
For general chat: Its ten best models average a score of 88 vs 87; it runs 86 more LLMs (520 vs 434). On the other hand, the Intel Arc A380 is about 40.2× faster on its own top models.
 AMD Ryzen Embedded V1500B NAS (64 GB)
|
 Intel Arc A380
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Memory | 64.0 GB unified | 6.0 GB VRAM |
| Usable for models | 54.4 GB | 6.0 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 19 GB/s | 186 GB/s |
| FP16 compute | 0.2 TFLOPS | 8.2 TFLOPS |
| Launch price | — | $139 |
| Released | 2018 | 2022 |
| LLMs that run | 520 of 622 | 434 of 622 |
| LLMs that run well | 147 | 297 |
| Image models that run | 61 of 61 | 43 of 61 |
| Video models that run | 42 of 43 | 3 of 43 |
| Decision models that run | 69 of 70 | 63 of 70 |
| Top-10 LLM average score | 88 | 87 |
| Top-10 LLM average speed | 1.2 tok/s | 47.8 tok/s |
| Best LLM | Nanbeige4.3 33B | Nanbeige4.2 3B |
Highlighted values are the best of the two. Model results assume 8K of context and the default macOS GPU memory limit on Macs.
LLMs
520 of 622 LLMs run on the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1500B NAS (64 GB). 54.4 GB usable for models.
434 of 622 LLMs run on the Intel Arc A380. 6.0 GB usable for models.
| Model | QualityRyzen Embedded V1500B NAS | SpeedRyzen Embedded V1500B NAS | RunsRyzen Embedded V1500B NAS | QualityArc A380 | SpeedArc A380 | RunsArc A380 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nanbeige4.3 33B | 95Excellent quality (A+) · 95 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.7 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Qwen3.8 27B | 95Excellent quality (A+) · 95 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Qwen3.6 27B | 94Excellent quality (A+) · 94 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 89Excellent quality (A+) · 89 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Kolibri 1 (78B-A3.5B) | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.6 tok/s | Slowtight fit | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen3.5 27B | 93Excellent quality (A+) · 93 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 92Excellent quality (A+) · 92 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Gemma 4 31B | 91Excellent quality (A+) · 91 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.0 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Gemma 4 26B-A4B | 91Excellent quality (A+) · 91 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 23.6 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| TMax 27B | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Fara 1.5 27B | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Raon-1 mini Preview (30B-A4B) | 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.9 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| UI-Mate 27B | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Nemotron Cascade 2 30B-A3B | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slow | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 24.9 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| EXAONE 4.5 33B | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.6 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Seed-OSS 36B Instruct | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507 | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 tok/s | Slow | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.7 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slow | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 24.9 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B Thinking | 75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 tok/s | Slow | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.6 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Hermes 4.3 36B | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen3-VL 32B Instruct | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B Instruct | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 tok/s | Slow | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.6 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Qwen3 30B-A3B | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 tok/s | Slow | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.7 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Qwen3-Omni 30B-A3B Instruct | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 tok/s | Slow | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.2 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Granite 4.2 30B | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.3 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Qwen3 32B | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B IT | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 22.5 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| InternVL3.5 38B | 75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Thinking | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| GLM-4 32B 0414 | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Devstral Small 2 (24B) | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.9 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Qwen3 Next 80B-A3B Instruct | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Granite 4.1 30B | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.4 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| EXAONE 4.0 32B | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.9 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Gemma 3 27B IT | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Baichuan M2 32B | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| InternVL3 38B | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507 | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 tok/s | Slow | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.7 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Qwen3 Coder 30B-A3B | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 tok/s | Slow | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.7 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| MedGemma 27B Text IT | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Gemma 4 12B | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.8 tok/s | Very slow | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.8 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Qwen2.5-VL 32B Instruct | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Hermes 4 70B | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Llama 3.3 70B Instruct | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Terminal RSI 27B | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| QwQ 32B | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Devstral Small 1.1 (24B) | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.0 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Magistral Small 2507 | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.0 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Hunyuan A13B (80B-A13B) | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.9 tok/s | Very slow | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Tülu 3 70B | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Hemmingway 1.5 | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.6 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Flint (40B-A2.5B) | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.4 tok/s | Runs well | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53.5 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Mistral Small 3.2 24B | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.9 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Olmo 3.1 32B Think | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| OpenReasoning Nemotron 32B | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Skywork OR1 32B | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Magistral Small 2506 | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.0 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Qwen3.6 35B-A3B | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.5 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Qwen3.5 35B-A3B | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.5 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.6 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Llama 3.1 70B Instruct | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Falcon-H1 34B Instruct | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.7 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Mistral Small 4 (119B-A6B) | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.3 tok/s | Slowtight fit | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Nex N2 Mini (35B-A3B) | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.7 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Qwen3 Coder Next (80B-A3B) | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Mistral Small 3.1 24B | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.9 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| EXAONE Deep 32B | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| GLM-Z1 32B (0414) | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Sage-A1.5 35B-A3B | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.5 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Kimi Dev 72B | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| gpt-oss 20B | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.7 tok/s | Slow | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.1 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Gemma 2 27B IT | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.5 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| InternVL3 78B | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Hermes 3 (Llama 3.1 70B) | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| QVQ 72B Preview | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Ornith 1.5 35B-A3B | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.5 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Command R (08-2024) 32B | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.9 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Ling 2.6 Flash (104B-A7.4B) | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.3 tok/s | Slowtight fit | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| GLM-4.6V | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.7 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Apodex 1.1 Mini (35B-A3B) | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.5 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Ornith 1.0 35B-A3B | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.5 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Mistral Small 3 24B (2501) | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.0 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Apertus v1.5 70B | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Ling Flash 2.0 (100B-A6B) | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.2 tok/s | Slowtight fit | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| OLMo 2 32B Instruct | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Aya Expanse 32B | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.9 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Aya Vision 32B | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.8 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Agents-A1 35B-A3B | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.7 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Qwen AgentWorld 35B-A3B | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.7 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| GLM-4.5V | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.7 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Solar Open 100B | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.7 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Voxtral Small 24B | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.9 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| GLM-4.7 Flash (30B-A3B) | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.0 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Dolphin Mistral 24B Venice Edition | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.9 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Sarvam 30B | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.2 tok/s | Runs well | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.8 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| OpenHands LM 32B | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| LFM2.5 24B-A2B | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.0 tok/s | Runs well | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.8 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Qwen2 72B Instruct | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen2-VL 72B Instruct | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Leanstral 119B-A6B | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.9 tok/s | Slowtight fit | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| GLM-4.5 Air (106B-A12B) | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.7 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Magistral Small 1.2 (24B) | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.9 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Apriel 1.5 15B Thinker | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.9 tok/s | Very slow | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.5 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Sarvam 105B | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slowtight fit | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Laguna XS 2.1 (33B-A3B) | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.2 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Dolphin 3.0 R1 Mistral 24B | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.0 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Phi-4 Reasoning Vision 15B | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.9 tok/s | Very slow | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.4 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Groot 65B A6B 261023 | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.3 tok/s | Slowtight fit | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Kimi Linear 48B-A3B | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.6 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Solar Pro Preview 22B | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.5 tok/s | Very slow | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.3 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| QwQ 32B Preview | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Apertus 70B Instruct | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 5/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Laguna S 2.1 (118B-A8B) | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.0 tok/s | Slowtight fit | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| SenseNova 6.8 Code2Video | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Maple Preview (20B-A1B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.6 tok/s | Runs well | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.0 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Nous Hermes 2 Mixtral 8x7B DPO | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.1 tok/s | Very slow | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 4/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Command R 35B (v01) | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 37Basic quality (D) · 37 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 5/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Command A (111B) | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen3 14B | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.9 tok/s | Very slow | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.1 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 tok/s | Slow | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.8 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Llama 3 70B Instruct | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 5/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.9 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Mixtral 8x7B Instruct | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.1 tok/s | Very slow | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 4/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Jamba 1.5 Mini | 48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.3 tok/s | Very slow | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 4/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Devstral Small 2505 | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.0 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Hermes 4 14B | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.9 tok/s | Very slow | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.1 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Qwen2 57B-A14B Instruct | 48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.2 tok/s | Very slow | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 4/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| KAT-Coder V2.5 Dev (35B-A3B) | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.7 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Gemma 4 E4B | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 tok/s | Slow | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.8 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Ring Flash 2.0 (100B-A6B) | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.2 tok/s | Slowtight fit | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Ling 3.0 Tiny (8B-A1.3B) | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.4 tok/s | Runs well | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 92.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| InternVL3 14B | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.9 tok/s | Very slow | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.8 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Yi 1.5 34B Chat | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 44/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.6 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Nanbeige4.2 3B | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| Aya 23 35B | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 4/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Phi-4 (14B) | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.9 tok/s | Very slow | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.0 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Ministral 3 14B | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.0 tok/s | Very slow | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.7 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 4B | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| Reka Flash 3.1 (21B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.5 tok/s | Very slow | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.6 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.9 tok/s | Very slow | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.0 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Codestral 22B | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.6 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Spark-X2.6 4B | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Command R+ (08-2024) 104B | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Ling Mini 2.0 (16B-A1.4B) | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.4 tok/s | Runs well | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 105 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Phi-4 Reasoning Plus (14B) | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.9 tok/s | Very slow | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.6 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Phi-3.5 MoE (42B-A6.6B) | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slow | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 5/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Hunyuan Hy-Memory 30B-A3B | 59Good quality (B) · 59 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.8 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Qwen2.5 14B Instruct 1M | 59Good quality (B) · 59 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.9 tok/s | Very slow | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.0 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Mistral Small 22B (2409) | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.6 tok/s | Very slow | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.6 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Phi-4 Reasoning (14B) | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.9 tok/s | Very slow | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.6 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Command A Reasoning (111B) | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| LFM2 24B-A2B | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.7 tok/s | Runs well | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.9 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Gemma 3 12B IT | 59Good quality (B) · 59 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.1 tok/s | Very slow | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.3 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| LLaVA 1.6 34B | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 42/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.6 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Command R+ 104B (04-2024) | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen1.5 32B Chat | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 4/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Axion 1.0 35B | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.7 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| North Mini Code 1.0 (30B-A3B) | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.6 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| TMax 4B | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen3.5 4B | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Trinity Mini (26B-A3B) | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 29.4 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Qwen2.5-Math 72B Instruct | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 5/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| LFM2.5 8B-A1B | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.5 tok/s | Runs well | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 101 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Apriel Nemotron 15B Thinker | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.9 tok/s | Very slow | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.8 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Agents-A1 4B | 59Good quality (B) · 59 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 tok/s | Slow | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| AceReason Nemotron 14B | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.9 tok/s | Very slow | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.0 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| OpenReasoning Nemotron 14B | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.9 tok/s | Very slow | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.0 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Qwen2.5 Coder 14B Instruct | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.9 tok/s | Very slow | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.0 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| LFM3 1.7B | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.4 tok/s | Runs well | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 51.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Gemma 4 E2B | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 tok/s | Runs well | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 62.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| NorthCUA Mini | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.7 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Ministral 3 14B Reasoning | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.0 tok/s | Very slow | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.7 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| InternLM2.5 20B Chat | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.7 tok/s | Very slow | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.9 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| ERNIE 4.5 21B-A3B | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30.0 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| K2 Horizon 7B | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.6 tok/s | Slow | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 31.8 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Yi 34B Chat | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 41/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.6 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Fara 1.5 4B | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 tok/s | Slow | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| DeepCoder 14B Preview | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.9 tok/s | Very slow | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.0 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| LLM4Decompile 22B V2 | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.6 tok/s | Very slow | 48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 46/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.6 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Ornith 1.5 122B-A10B | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.7 tok/s | Very slowover memory limit | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B-A12B | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.3 tok/s | Very slowover memory limit | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiniCPM5 2B | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.1 tok/s | Runs well | 59Good quality (B) · 59 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 4.0 H Tiny (7B-A1B) | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.4 tok/s | Runs well | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 95.8 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Qwen3.5 122B-A10B | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.7 tok/s | Very slowover memory limit | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Mage-VL 4.7B | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| SenseNova Loop 9B Preview | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 29.7 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.9 tok/s | Very slow | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.0 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| JanusCoder 14B | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.9 tok/s | Very slow | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.1 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| DeepSeek LLM 67B Chat | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.2 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 3/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Mistral Nemo 12B Instruct | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.1 tok/s | Very slow | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.6 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Ornith 1.5 9B | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 23.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen3-VL 4B Instruct | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen3.5 9B | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 23.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Ornith 1.0 9B | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 23.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Pixtral 12B (2409) | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.1 tok/s | Very slow | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.1 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Qwen1.5 110B Chat | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 4/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Granite 4.0 H Small (32B-A9B) | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.1 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| LFM3-VL 2B | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.2 tok/s | Runs well | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| TMax 9B | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.6 tok/s | Slow | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 25.2 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Kimi-VL A3B Thinking 2506 | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.9 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Granite 4.2 3B | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.7 tok/s | Slow | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Nemotron 3 Super 120B-A12B | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.3 tok/s | Very slowover memory limit | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Ling 3.0 Flash (127B-A5B) | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.3 tok/s | Slowover memory limit | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen3 8B | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.0 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Groot 19B A3B 261023 | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 31.3 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| ERNIE 4.5 21B-A3B Thinking | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30.1 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| DeepSeek Coder 33B Instruct | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 4/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Llama 2 70B Chat | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 3/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen3 4B | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Phi-3 Medium 128K Instruct | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.0 tok/s | Very slow | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.5 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| MiMo-VL 7B RL | 48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.5 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| InternLM2 Chat 20B | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.7 tok/s | Very slow | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.9 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| OLMo 2 13B Instruct | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.0 tok/s | Very slow | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.9 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Nemotron 3 Nano 4B | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Phi-3 Medium (14B) | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.0 tok/s | Very slow | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.2 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Granite 4.2 8B | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.7 tok/s | Slow | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Unlimited OCR 2 (3B-A0.6B) | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 29.5 tok/s | Runs well | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 94.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| MiMo 7B RL | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.8 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Mage-VL-Cowork 4.7B | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| CogVLM2 Llama 3 Chat 19B | 37Basic quality (D) · 37 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.7 tok/s | Very slow | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 3/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Mellum2.1 Thinking (12B-A2.5B) | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.4 tok/s | Runs well | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 84.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| InternVL3 8B | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Gemma 3n E4B | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.9 tok/s | Slow | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Code Llama 70B Instruct | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 4/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| LFM2 8B-A1B | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.5 tok/s | Runs well | 31Basic quality (D) · 31 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 101 tok/s | Runs great |
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B v1 | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.1 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Granite 4.1 3B | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.8 tok/s | Slow | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| MiniCPM4 8B | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 27.5 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Kimi-VL A3B Instruct | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.9 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Qwen3 4B Thinking 2507 | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite Code 34B Instruct | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 38/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.7 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| InternVL3.5 8B | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slow | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Qwen3-VL 8B Instruct | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.7 tok/s | Slow | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.7 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| DeepSeek V2 Lite Chat | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.2 tok/s | Runs well | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 73.1 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Unlimited OCR (3B-A0.6B) | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 29.5 tok/s | Runs well | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 94.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Hunyuan 7B Instruct | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30.1 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.7 tok/s | Runs well | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 57.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| MiniCPM5 1B | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.2 tok/s | Runs well | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 82.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Code Llama 34B Instruct | 37Basic quality (D) · 37 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.4 tok/s | Very slow | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 36/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.6 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 29.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 27.2 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| MiMo V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 24.0 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Phi-4 Mini (3.8B) | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.1 tok/s | Slow | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| DeepSeek Coder V2 Lite (16B) | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.2 tok/s | Runs well | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 73.1 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Ministral 3 3B | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.1 tok/s | Slow | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Gemma 3 4B IT | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.6 tok/s | Slow | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 4.1 8B | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.7 tok/s | Slow | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Olmo 3 7B Instruct | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30.9 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| MiniCPM-V 4.5 8B | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.7 tok/s | Slow | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.9 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.4 tok/s | Slow | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| TMax 2B | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 47.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen1.5 14B Chat | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.0 tok/s | Very slow | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 3/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Foundation-Sec 1.1 8B Instruct | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.1 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| InternVL2.5 8B | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 27.9 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| North Micro Vision | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.2 tok/s | Runs well | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| MedGemma 4B IT | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.6 tok/s | Slow | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5 7B Instruct 1M | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 29.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| GLM-4.1V 9B Thinking | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 27.8 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Nemotron Nano 9B v2 | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.6 tok/s | Slow | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 25.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Falcon-H1 7B Instruct | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 29.7 tok/s | Runs well |
| Moonlight 16B-A3B Instruct | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 60.8 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| GLiDE 9B | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| Phi-3.5 Mini Instruct | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.1 tok/s | Slow | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.0 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.0 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Ling 3.0 flash Sante | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.3 tok/s | Slowover memory limit | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Hunyuan 4B Instruct | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.7 tok/s | Slow | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Hermes 3 (Llama 3.1 8B) | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.1 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Llama 3.1 8B Instruct | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.1 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| MiniCPM-V 2.6 8B | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 27.8 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Mistral Large 2.1 (2411) | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.2 tok/s | Very slowover memory limit | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Ministral 3 8B | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.6 tok/s | Slow | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.1 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| PaddleOCR-VL 1.6 0.9B | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.5 tok/s | Runs well | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 4.0 Micro (3B) | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.8 tok/s | Slow | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Phi-3.5 Vision Instruct | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.7 tok/s | Slow | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 69.0 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Granite 3.2 8B Instruct | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.1 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Granite 3.3 8B | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.1 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Ministral 8B (2410) | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.7 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| LFM2.5 1.2B Instruct | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.8 tok/s | Runs well | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 75.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| EXAONE 3.5 7.8B | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.8 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| DeepHermes 3 Llama 3 8B Preview | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.1 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Dolphin 3.0 Llama 3.1 8B | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.1 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Tülu 3 8B | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.1 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Falcon 3 7B Instruct | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30.2 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Mistral Large 2 (123B) | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.2 tok/s | Very slowover memory limit | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Pixtral Large 124B (2411) | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.2 tok/s | Very slowover memory limit | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen3.5 2B | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.2 tok/s | Runs well | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| AFM 4.5B | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.3 tok/s | Slow | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| Seed-Coder 8B Reasoning | 48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.7 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Gemma 3n E2B | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.7 tok/s | Runs well | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 72.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qianfan-OCR 4B | 48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| UI-Mate 9B | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 24.0 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| UI-Venus 2 9B | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 24.0 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.1 tok/s | Slow | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.0 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Granite 3.1 8B Instruct | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.1 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Phi-3 Small 8K Instruct | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30.5 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Dolphin 2.9.4 Llama 3.1 8B | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.1 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.1 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| OpenChat 3.6 8B | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.1 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| InternVL2 8B | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 27.9 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Falcon 3 10B Instruct | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.0 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Qwen3.5 0.8B | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 29.2 tok/s | Runs well | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 47.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2 7B Instruct | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 29.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Qwen2-VL 7B Instruct | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 27.2 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Command R7B | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.1 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| EXAONE 4.0 1.2B | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.3 tok/s | Runs well | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 69.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen3-VL 2B Instruct | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.9 tok/s | Runs well | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| MiniCPM3 4B | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.8 tok/s | Slow | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| MiniCPM-o 2.6 8B | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.7 tok/s | Slow | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.0 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| LFM2.5 2.6B | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.9 tok/s | Runs well | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| MiniCPM-OCR 1.0 1.3B | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.1 tok/s | Runs well | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 68.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| EXAONE Deep 7.8B | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.8 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| GLM-4 9B 0414 | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 24.0 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Seed-Coder 8B Instruct | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.7 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| NorthCUA Nano | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 24.0 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Phi-3 Mini 4K Instruct | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.1 tok/s | Slow | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Gemma 2 9B IT | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.4 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| InternLM2 Math Plus 20B | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.7 tok/s | Very slow | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 41/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.9 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Mistral-NeMo-Minitron 8B Instruct | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 tok/s | Slow | 29Basic quality (D) · 29 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.1 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Falcon-H1R 7B | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 23.0 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Llama 3 8B Instruct | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.1 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| LightOnOCR-3 4B | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 tok/s | Slow | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Phi-3 Vision 128K Instruct | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.7 tok/s | Slow | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 69.0 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| OLMoE 1B-7B Instruct | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.4 tok/s | Runs well | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 92.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| LFM2.5-VL 3B | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.3 tok/s | Runs well | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| S5 nano | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.2 tok/s | Slow | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Olmo 3 7B Think | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30.9 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| InternLM3 8B Instruct | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.7 tok/s | Slow | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 25.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Jamba Reasoning 3B | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.1 tok/s | Runs well | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Command R7B Arabic | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.1 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Qwen2.5 Coder 7B Instruct | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 29.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Voxtral Mini 3B | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.2 tok/s | Slow | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Chandra OCR 2 | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| TeleOCR | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.8 tok/s | Runs well | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 62.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| SmolLM3 3B | 29Basic quality (D) · 29 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.5 tok/s | Runs well | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Raon 1 nano | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.6 tok/s | Slow | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| OpenReasoning Nemotron 7B | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 29.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Jamba2 3B | 29Basic quality (D) · 29 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.6 tok/s | Runs well | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| InternLM2.5 7B Chat | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Phi-4 Mini Reasoning (3.8B) | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.1 tok/s | Slow | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Aya Expanse 8B | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.1 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Apertus 8B Instruct | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.0 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| GLM-4 9B Chat 1M | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30.2 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Falcon 40B Instruct | 15Basic quality (D) · 15 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow | 11Basic quality (D) · 11 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 33/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Granite 3.0 8B Instruct | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 3.1 3B-A800M Instruct | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.8 tok/s | Runs great | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 78.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| LFM2.5 350M | 13Basic quality (D) · 13 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.4 tok/s | Runs great | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 117 tok/s | Runs great |
| GLM-4 9B Chat (2024) | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 24.0 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| LFM2 1.2B | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.7 tok/s | Runs well | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 75.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Devstral 2 (123B) | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.2 tok/s | Very slowover memory limit | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Granite 4.0 H 1B | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.5 tok/s | Runs well | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 60.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5-VL 3B Instruct | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.2 tok/s | Slow | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Foundation-Sec 8B Reasoning | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.1 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Apertus v1.5 8B | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.6 tok/s | Slow | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.2 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| LFM2 700M | 15Basic quality (D) · 15 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.3 tok/s | Runs great | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 55.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Orca 2 13B | 27Basic quality (D) · 27 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.0 tok/s | Very slow | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 41/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 9.5 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| StarCoder2 15B Instruct | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.9 tok/s | Very slow | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 42/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.8 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| WeVisOne-VL 4B | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 tok/s | Slow | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 | 31Basic quality (D) · 31 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Falcon-H1 0.5B Instruct | 13Basic quality (D) · 13 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.8 tok/s | Runs great | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 78.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Dolphin 2.9 Llama 3 8B | 31Basic quality (D) · 31 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 31Basic quality (D) · 31 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.1 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Zamba2 7B Instruct | 31Basic quality (D) · 31 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5-Omni 7B | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 tok/s | Slow | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Qwen3 1.7B | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.5 tok/s | Runs well | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 3.0 3B-A800M Instruct | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.8 tok/s | Runs great | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 78.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| EXAONE 3.0 7.8B Instruct | 31Basic quality (D) · 31 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 4.0 H 350M | 11Basic quality (D) · 11 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.1 tok/s | Runs great | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 120 tok/s | Runs great |
| OLMo 2 7B Instruct | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.2 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| LFM2 350M | 11Basic quality (D) · 11 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.4 tok/s | Runs great | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 117 tok/s | Runs great |
| Falcon3 Mamba 7B Instruct | 31Basic quality (D) · 31 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 31Basic quality (D) · 31 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 31.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| LFM2-VL 450M | 11Basic quality (D) · 11 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.6 tok/s | Runs great | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 90.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.1 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Granite 4.0 H Micro | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.1 tok/s | Runs well | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite Code 20B Instruct | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.7 tok/s | Very slow | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 39/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.2 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Aya Vision 8B | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.7 tok/s | Slow | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.1 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Falcon-H1 1.5B Instruct | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.7 tok/s | Runs well | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 57.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Hermes 2 Pro Mistral 7B | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Starling LM 7B Beta | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Fara 7B | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 27.2 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Gemma 3 1B | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.3 tok/s | Runs great | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen3 0.6B | 9Basic quality (D) · 9 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.0 tok/s | Runs great | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 54.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Falcon 3 3B Instruct | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.1 tok/s | Slow | 29Basic quality (D) · 29 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| EXAONE 3.5 2.4B | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.5 tok/s | Runs well | 29Basic quality (D) · 29 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 50.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct | 29Basic quality (D) · 29 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 tok/s | Slow | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.0 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Granite 3.2 2B Instruct | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.0 tok/s | Runs well | 29Basic quality (D) · 29 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 47.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 3.3 2B | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.0 tok/s | Runs well | 29Basic quality (D) · 29 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 47.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| LFM2.5 230M | 10Basic quality (D) · 10 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.5 tok/s | Runs great | 10Basic quality (D) · 10 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 178 tok/s | Runs great |
| OpenChat 3.5 (0106) | 29Basic quality (D) · 29 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| LFM2 2.6B | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.6 tok/s | Runs well | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 47.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| Falcon-H1 3B Instruct | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.2 tok/s | Runs well | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| StableLM 2 12B Chat | 27Basic quality (D) · 27 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.1 tok/s | Very slow | 19Basic quality (D) · 19 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.7 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| Llama 3.2 3B Instruct | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.0 tok/s | Runs well | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5 0.5B Instruct | 9Basic quality (D) · 9 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.1 tok/s | Runs great | 10Basic quality (D) · 10 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 83.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Llama 3.2 1B Instruct | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.5 tok/s | Runs well | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 71.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| GLM-Z1 9B (0414) | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 24.0 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| DeepSeek MoE 16B Chat | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.1 tok/s | Runs well | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.6 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| SmolVLM 500M Instruct | 9Basic quality (D) · 9 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.5 tok/s | Runs great | 10Basic quality (D) · 10 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 80.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Mistral 7B Instruct v0.2 | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Nous Hermes 2 Mistral 7B DPO | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| OpenChat 3.5 (1210) | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5 1.5B Instruct | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.8 tok/s | Runs well | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 57.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Aya 23 8B | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.1 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| LFM2-VL 1.6B | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.4 tok/s | Runs well | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 56.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5 3B Instruct | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Baichuan 2 13B Chat | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.4 tok/s | Very slow | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 40/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.8 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Granite 3.1 2B Instruct | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.0 tok/s | Runs well | 27Basic quality (D) · 27 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 47.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| Nous Hermes 2 SOLAR 10.7B | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 tok/s | Slow | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| SOLAR 10.7B Instruct | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 tok/s | Slow | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Qwen2.5-Omni 3B | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Llama 2 13B Chat | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.5 tok/s | Very slow | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 41/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 9.5 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| WeVisOne VL 2B | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 49.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| SmolLM2 360M Instruct | 7Basic quality (D) · 7 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.1 tok/s | Runs great | 8Basic quality (D) · 8 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 114 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen1.5 MoE A2.7B Chat | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.5 tok/s | Runs well | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.1 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| GLiDE 0.8B | 7Basic quality (D) · 7 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.0 tok/s | Runs great | 11Basic quality (D) · 11 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 54.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Hermes 3 Llama 3.2 3B | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.0 tok/s | Runs well | 31Basic quality (D) · 31 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 29.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| OpenHermes 2.5 Mistral 7B | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Starling LM 7B Alpha | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Hunyuan 0.5B Instruct | 6Basic quality (D) · 6 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 47.0 tok/s | Runs great | 8Basic quality (D) · 8 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 75.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| SmolVLM2 2.2B Instruct | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.3 tok/s | Runs well | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Code Llama 13B Instruct | 29Basic quality (D) · 29 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.0 tok/s | Very slow | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 2/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Hunyuan 1.8B Instruct | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 tok/s | Runs well | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 49.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Yi 1.5 6B Chat | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| SmolVLM 256M Instruct | 5Basic quality (D) · 5 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 52.4 tok/s | Runs great | 6Basic quality (D) · 6 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 157 tok/s | Runs great |
| Gemma 2 2B | 19Basic quality (D) · 19 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.4 tok/s | Runs well | 27Basic quality (D) · 27 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| DeepSeek Prover V2 7B | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.7 tok/s | Slow | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 44/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.7 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| ERNIE 4.5 0.3B | 5Basic quality (D) · 5 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.1 tok/s | Runs great | 6Basic quality (D) · 6 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 114 tok/s | Runs great |
| Gemma 3 270M | 5Basic quality (D) · 5 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 50.5 tok/s | Runs great | 6Basic quality (D) · 6 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 152 tok/s | Runs great |
| Mistral 7B Instruct v0.1 | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| SmolLM2 1.7B Instruct | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.8 tok/s | Runs well | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 51.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2 0.5B Instruct | 5Basic quality (D) · 5 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.1 tok/s | Runs great | 6Basic quality (D) · 6 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 83.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2-VL 2B Instruct | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.5 tok/s | Runs well | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen1.5 7B Chat | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 42/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.2 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Yi 1.5 9B Chat | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.7 tok/s | Slow | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| SmolVLM 2.2B Instruct | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.3 tok/s | Runs well | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| SmolLM 360M Instruct | 4Basic quality (D) · 4 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.1 tok/s | Runs great | 5Basic quality (D) · 5 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 114 tok/s | Runs great |
| Falcon Mamba 7B Instruct | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 31.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| StarCoder2 15B (base) | 31Basic quality (D) · 31 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.9 tok/s | Very slow | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 38/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.8 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| LLaVA 1.5 13B | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.5 tok/s | Very slow | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 39/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 9.2 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| WizardLM 13B v1.2 | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.5 tok/s | Very slow | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 39/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 9.5 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Granite 3.0 2B Instruct | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.3 tok/s | Runs well | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Neural Chat 7B v3.3 | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 19Basic quality (D) · 19 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| LLaVA 1.6 Mistral 7B | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 19Basic quality (D) · 19 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| SmolLM2 135M Instruct | 4Basic quality (D) · 4 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 76.9 tok/s | Runs great | 4Basic quality (D) · 4 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 315 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite Vision 3.2 2B | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.8 tok/s | Runs well | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| RecurrentGemma 9B IT | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 29.7 tok/s | Runs well |
| Gemma 1.1 7B IT | 19Basic quality (D) · 19 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slow | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 43/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.1 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Falcon-H1 Tiny 90M Instruct | 3Basic quality (D) · 3 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 51.2 tok/s | Runs great | 3Basic quality (D) · 3 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 455 tok/s | Runs great |
| Vicuna 13B v1.5 | 19Basic quality (D) · 19 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.5 tok/s | Very slow | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 38/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 9.5 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Qwen2 1.5B Instruct | 11Basic quality (D) · 11 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.9 tok/s | Runs well | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 57.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| InternLM2.5 1.8B Chat | 15Basic quality (D) · 15 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.4 tok/s | Runs well | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 47.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Zephyr 7B Beta | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Falcon 3 1B Instruct | 11Basic quality (D) · 11 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.3 tok/s | Runs well | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| SmolLM 135M Instruct | 2Basic quality (D) · 2 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 76.9 tok/s | Runs great | 2Basic quality (D) · 2 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 315 tok/s | Runs great |
| OLMo 2 1B Instruct | 9Basic quality (D) · 9 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.8 tok/s | Runs well | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 60.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.7 tok/s | Slow | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Gemma 7B IT | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slow | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 43/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.1 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Zamba2 2.7B Instruct | 15Basic quality (D) · 15 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.1 tok/s | Runs well | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Spark X2.6 1.7B | 11Basic quality (D) · 11 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.9 tok/s | Runs well | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 51.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| DeepSeek Coder 6.7B Instruct | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slow | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 41/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 23.7 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| CodeGeeX4 All 9B | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 24.0 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| GLiDE 2B | 11Basic quality (D) · 11 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.2 tok/s | Runs well | 17Basic quality (D) · 17 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 47.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| surya ocr 2.5 | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.8 tok/s | Runs great | 15Basic quality (D) · 15 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Orca 2 7B | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slow | 15Basic quality (D) · 15 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.5 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| SmolLM 1.7B Instruct | 9Basic quality (D) · 9 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.9 tok/s | Runs well | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 51.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5 Coder 1.5B Instruct | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.8 tok/s | Runs well | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 57.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| TinyLlama 1.1B Chat | 4Basic quality (D) · 4 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 29.3 tok/s | Runs well | 6Basic quality (D) · 6 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 80.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| LLM4Decompile 6.7B V2 | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slow | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 40/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 23.7 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 46/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5-Math 7B Instruct | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 46/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 29.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| Codestral Mamba 7B | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 46/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| DeepScaleR 1.5B Preview | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 46/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 tok/s | Runs well | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 49.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Yi 6B Chat | 19Basic quality (D) · 19 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 46/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Llama 2 7B Chat | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 46/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slow | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.5 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Baichuan 2 7B Chat | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 46/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.4 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| StarCoder 15B | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 46/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.9 tok/s | Very slow | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 42/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.5 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM |
| StableLM 2 1.6B Chat | 7Basic quality (D) · 7 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 46/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.7 tok/s | Runs well | 10Basic quality (D) · 10 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 54.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| StableLM 2 Zephyr 1.6B | 7Basic quality (D) · 7 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 46/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.7 tok/s | Runs well | 10Basic quality (D) · 10 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 54.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| Mathstral 7B | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 46/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| SQLCoder 7B v2 | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 46/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slow | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 39/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 23.7 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| StableLM Zephyr 3B | 11Basic quality (D) · 11 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 46/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.5 tok/s | Runs well | 15Basic quality (D) · 15 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Yi Coder 9B Chat | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 46/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.7 tok/s | Slow | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Phi-2 2.7B | 11Basic quality (D) · 11 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 45/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.6 tok/s | Runs well | 15Basic quality (D) · 15 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| DeepSeek LLM 7B Chat | 15Basic quality (D) · 15 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 45/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.7 tok/s | Slow | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.5 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Qwen2.5 Coder 0.5B Instruct | 7Basic quality (D) · 7 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 45/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.1 tok/s | Runs great | 8Basic quality (D) · 8 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 83.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite Code 8B Instruct (128K) | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 45/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| InternLM2 Math Plus 7B | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 45/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| CodeGemma 7B | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 45/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slow | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 41/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.1 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| LLM4Decompile 9B V2 | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 45/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.7 tok/s | Slow | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| LLaVA 1.5 7B | 13Basic quality (D) · 13 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 45/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.6 tok/s | Slow | 11Basic quality (D) · 11 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 44/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 tok/s | Runs well | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 49.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Gemma 2B IT | 8Basic quality (D) · 8 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 44/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.9 tok/s | Runs well | 11Basic quality (D) · 11 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5-Math 1.5B Instruct | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 44/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.5 tok/s | Runs well | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 57.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Vicuna 7B v1.5 | 11Basic quality (D) · 11 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 44/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slow | 9Basic quality (D) · 9 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.5 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| d1 2B | 19Basic quality (D) · 19 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 44/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.2 tok/s | Runs well | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Yi Coder 1.5B Chat | 11Basic quality (D) · 11 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 44/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.8 tok/s | Runs well | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 60.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Code Llama 7B Instruct | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 43/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slow | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 38/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 23.7 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload |
| OLMo 7B Instruct | 11Basic quality (D) · 11 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 43/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.7 tok/s | Slow | 9Basic quality (D) · 9 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| DeepSeek Coder 1.3B Instruct | 8Basic quality (D) · 8 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 43/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 23.9 tok/s | Runs well | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 65.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| LLM4Decompile 1.3B V2 | 8Basic quality (D) · 8 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 43/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 23.9 tok/s | Runs well | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 65.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| WizardMath 7B v1.1 | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 43/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite Code 3B Instruct (128K) | 19Basic quality (D) · 19 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 43/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.6 tok/s | Slow | 19Basic quality (D) · 19 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 50.1 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Stable Code Instruct 3B | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 43/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.5 tok/s | Runs well | 19Basic quality (D) · 19 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.2 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| InternLM 7B | 10Basic quality (D) · 10 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 43/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 8Basic quality (D) · 8 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| StarCoder2 7B | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 42/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| StarCoder2 3B | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 41/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.6 tok/s | Runs well | 17Basic quality (D) · 17 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| CodeGemma 2B | 9Basic quality (D) · 9 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 40/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.9 tok/s | Runs well | 13Basic quality (D) · 13 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Falcon 7B Instruct | 4Basic quality (D) · 4 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 40/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.5 tok/s | Slow | 4Basic quality (D) · 4 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| gpt-oss 120B | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Kimi K3.1 Pro (2.8T) | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (552B-A16B) | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| GLM-5.3 (753B-A40B) | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen3.8 Max (2.4T-A95B) | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Kimi K3 (2.8T) | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| LongCat 2.5 (1.6T-A48B) | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiMo V2.6 Pro (1T-A42B) | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 (560B-A25B) | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiniMax M3.1 Flash (428B-A23B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Nex N2.6 (321B-A18B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Step 5 Preview (600B-A27B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| GLM-5.3 Flash (320B-A18B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiMo V2.6 Flash (310B-A15B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (552B-A16B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Mistral Large 4 (1T-A52B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen3.8 Flash Next (125B-A6B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| GLM-5.2 (753B-A40B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Hunyuan Hy4 Preview (780B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Muse Spark Open (816B-A42B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.6T-A49B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Kimi K2.6 (1T) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Ling 3.1 Flash (560B-A25B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiMo V2.5 Pro (1T-A42B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Intern-S2 (397B-A17B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| GLM-5.1 (744B-A40B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Nex N2 Pro (397B-A17B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro (April 2026) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Naive N0.5 Flash (309B-A15.5B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen3.5 397B-A17B | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiniMax M3 (427B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| GLM-5 (744B-A40B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| K2-Horizon (375B-A23B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Hunyuan Hy3 (295B-A21B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Beam 1.0 (501B-A23B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Kimi K2.5 (1T) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Kimi K2.7 Code (1T) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash (284B-A13B) | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiMo V2.5 (310B-A15B) | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Ornith 1.5 397B-A17B | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V3.2 (671B) | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Inkling Small (276B-A12B) | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| GLM-4.7 (355B-A32B) | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Inkling (975B-A41B) | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiniMax M2.7 (230B-A10B) | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Step 3.7 Flash (198B-A11B) | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek R1 0528 (671B) | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Kimi K2 Thinking (1T) | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V3.2 Exp | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Ling 2.6 1T | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiniMax M2.5 (230B-A10B) | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek R1 (671B) | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash (April 2026) | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Step 3.5 Flash (196B-A11B) | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V3.1 (671B) | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 (1T) | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiniMax M2.1 (230B-A10B) | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen3 Coder 480B-A35B | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiMo V2 Flash (309B-A15B) | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Ling 1T | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Mistral Large 3 (675B) | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Solar Open 2 250B | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Kimi K2 Instruct (July 2025) | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiniMax M2 (230B-A10B) | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Instruct | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Command A+ (218B-A25B) | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| K-EXAONE 236B-A23B | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| LongCat Flash Chat (560B) | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen3 235B-A22B | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| InternVL3.5 241B-A28B | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Baichuan M3 235B-A22B | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| GLM-4.6 (355B-A32B) | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V3 0324 (671B) | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiniMax-M1 80K | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| GLM-4.5 (355B-A32B) | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiniMax-M1 40K | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Mistral Medium 3.5 (128B) | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Trinity Large Thinking (400B-A13B) | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| ERNIE 4.5 300B-A47B | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Hermes 4 405B | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| NorthCUA Pro | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| dots.llm1 Instruct | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiniMax-Text-01 | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Tülu 3 405B | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V3 (671B) | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek Coder V2 (236B) | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek Coder V2 Instruct (0614) | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V2.5 1210 | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Llama 3.1 405B Instruct | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Llama 4 Maverick (17B x 128E) | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V2.5 | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Jamba 1.5 Large | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V2 Chat | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 5/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 5/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Mixtral 8x22B Instruct | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 5/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 5/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Grok-1 (314B) | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 4/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 4/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Snowflake Arctic Instruct | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 4/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 4/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Falcon 180B Chat | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 3/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 3/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
Image models
61 of 61 image models run on the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1500B NAS (64 GB). 54.4 GB usable for models.
43 of 61 image models run on the Intel Arc A380. 6.0 GB usable for models.
| Model | QualityRyzen Embedded V1500B NAS | SpeedRyzen Embedded V1500B NAS | RunsRyzen Embedded V1500B NAS | QualityArc A380 | SpeedArc A380 | RunsArc A380 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Krea 2 Turbo | 92Excellent quality (A+) · 92 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.2 min | Very slow | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen-Image 2.1 | 92Excellent quality (A+) · 92 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 h | Very slow | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| FLUX.2 [klein] 9B | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.1 min | Very slow | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21 s | Runs welltight fit · CPU offload |
| Qwen-Image 2512 | 89Excellent quality (A+) · 89 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.9 h | Very slow | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| ERNIE-Image | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 62.5 min | Very slow | 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.6 min | Very slowtight fit · CPU offload |
| Fibo 2.0 Dev | 93Excellent quality (A+) · 93 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 63.9 min | Very slow | 93Excellent quality (A+) · 93 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen-Image | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 h | Very slow | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Ideogram 4 | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 63.9 min | Very slow | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at NF4, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen-Image 2.1 Turbo | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.9 min | Very slow | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Ming-Image 0.1 Design | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.7 min | Very slow | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| FireRed-Image-Edit 1.1 | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.4 h | Very slow | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen-Image-Edit 2511 | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.4 h | Very slow | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| FLUX.1 Krea [dev] | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.1 min | Very slow | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 min | Very slowtight fit · CPU offload |
| HiDream-I1 Full | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.5 h | Very slow | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at NF4, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 62.5 min | Very slow | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.8 min | Very slowtight fit · CPU offload |
| MiniMax H3 Image | 91Excellent quality (A+) · 91 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.9 min | Very slowencoder unloaded after use | 91Excellent quality (A+) · 91 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| FLUX.2 [dev] | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.0 h | Very slowtight fit | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| FLUX.1 [dev] | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.1 min | Very slow | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at NF4, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.9 min | Very slowCPU offload |
| FLUX 3 Image Klein | 91Excellent quality (A+) · 91 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.2 min | Very slow | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 73 s | Slowtight fit · encoder in RAM |
| ERNIE-Image Turbo | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 9.1 min | Very slow | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38 s | Runs welltight fit · CPU offload |
| HiDream-I1 Dev | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 55.6 min | Very slow | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at NF4, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MOSS-Image SFT | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.8 min | Very slow | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 min | Very slowtight fit · encoder in RAM |
| FLUX.1 Fill [dev] | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.5 min | Very slow | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| HiDream-I1 Fast | 75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.7 min | Very slow | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at NF4, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Z-Image Turbo | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.1 min | Very slow | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30 s | Runs wellCPU offload |
| FLUX.1 [schnell] | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.7 min | Very slow | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at NF4, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 29 s | Runs wellCPU offload |
| Chroma1-HD | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 56.8 min | Very slow | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.0 min | Very slowtight fit · CPU offload |
| Z-Image | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.3 min | Very slow | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 min | Very slowCPU offload |
| CogView4 6B | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 51.2 min | Very slow | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.6 min | Very slowCPU offload |
| FLUX.2 [klein] 4B | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.8 min | Very slow | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13 s | Runs greatencoder in RAM |
| Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 31.3 min | Very slow | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.2 min | Slowtight fit · CPU offload |
| Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.5 min | Very slow | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19 s | Runs welltight fit · CPU offload |
| HunyuanImage 3.0 (80B-A13B) | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 h | Very slowCPU offload | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Iris-3B | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.5 min | Very slow | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 min | Very slowCPU offload |
| Cosmos3-Super Text2Image (64B) | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.2 h | Very slowCPU offload | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| OmniGen2 | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.5 min | Very slow | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 min | Very slowCPU offload |
| Kolors | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.4 min | Very slow | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38 s | Runs wellencoder in RAM |
| Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.1 min | Very slow | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 58 s | Slowencoder in RAM |
| AuraFlow v0.3 | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.8 min | Very slow | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.8 min | Very slowCPU offload |
| Lumina-Image 2.0 | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.9 min | Very slow | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 67 s | Slowencoder in RAM |
| Kandinsky 3 | 48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 25.6 min | Very slow | 48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.0 min | SlowCPU offload |
| Juggernaut XL v9 | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.8 min | Very slow | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41 s | Slowtight fit |
| RealVisXL V5.0 | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.8 min | Very slow | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41 s | Slowtight fit |
| DreamShaper XL v2 Turbo | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.7 min | Very slow | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12 s | Runs welltight fit |
| Stable Diffusion 3 Medium | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.8 min | Very slow | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30 s | Runs wellencoder in RAM |
| Animagine XL 4.0 | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.9 min | Very slow | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38 s | Runs welltight fit |
| Illustrious XL v0.1 | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.9 min | Very slow | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38 s | Runs welltight fit |
| SDXL-Lightning (4-step) | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.0 min | Slow | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.4 s | Runs welltight fit |
| Playground v2.5 | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.3 min | Very slow | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 69 s | Slowtight fit |
| Pony Diffusion V6 XL | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.8 min | Very slow | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35 s | Runs welltight fit |
| Stable Cascade | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.2 min | Very slow | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 60 s | SlowCPU offload |
| PixArt-Σ XL 1024 | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.3 min | Very slow | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16 s | Runs wellencoder in RAM |
| Animagine XL 3.1 | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.9 min | Very slow | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38 s | Runs welltight fit |
| Stable Diffusion XL 1.0 | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.8 min | Very slow | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41 s | Slowtight fit |
| SDXL Turbo | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 23 s | Runs well | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.4 s | Runs great |
| Hunyuan-DiT v1.2 | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.1 min | Very slow | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 64 s | Slowtight fit · encoder in RAM |
| SD Turbo | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14 s | Runs well | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.8 s | Runs great |
| Realistic Vision V5.1 | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 min | Very slow | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12 s | Runs great |
| DreamShaper 8 | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 min | Very slow | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12 s | Runs great |
| LCM DreamShaper v7 | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 46/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43 s | Slow | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.5 s | Runs great |
| Stable Diffusion 1.5 | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 45/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 min | Very slow | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12 s | Runs great |
Video models
42 of 43 video models run on the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1500B NAS (64 GB). 54.4 GB usable for models.
3 of 43 video models run on the Intel Arc A380. 6.0 GB usable for models.
| Model | QualityRyzen Embedded V1500B NAS | SpeedRyzen Embedded V1500B NAS | RunsRyzen Embedded V1500B NAS | QualityArc A380 | SpeedArc A380 | RunsArc A380 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTX-2.3 | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.8 h | Very slow | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Bernini-R A14B (video generation + editing) | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.1 h | Very slow | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| LTX-2.5 (22B, video + audio) | 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.0 h | Very slowtight fit | 81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Wan 2.2 I2V A14B | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 87.2 h | Very slow | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Wan 2.2 T2V A14B | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 87.2 h | Very slow | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| HunyuanVideo 1.5 (8.3B) | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 76.7 h | Very slow | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| LTX-2 (19B, video + audio) | 81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.8 h | Very slow | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiniMax H3 (33B, video + audio) | 89Excellent quality (A+) · 89 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.5 h | Very slowencoder unloaded after use | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Wan 2.2 Animate 14B | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 103.5 h | Very slow | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Wan 2.1 I2V 14B 720P | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 108.9 h | Very slow | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Wan 2.1 T2V 14B | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 108.9 h | Very slow | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Wan 2.1 VACE 14B | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 119.8 h | Very slow | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| HY-OmniWeaving (8.3B, unified video) | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 25.1 h | Very slow | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| SkyReels V2 T2V 14B 720P | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 102.3 h | Very slow | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| SCAIL-2 14B (character animation) | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 51.2 h | Very slow | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| HunyuanVideo 13B | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 130.7 h | Very slow | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| HunyuanVideo I2V 13B | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 130.7 h | Very slow | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Wan 2.2 TI2V 5B | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 24.6 h | Very slow | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Step-Video T2V (30B) | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 132.1 h | Very slowtight fit | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Open-Sora 2.0 (11B) | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 142.1 h | Very slow | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Wan 2.2 S2V 14B (speech to video) | 75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 54.5 h | Very slow | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Cosmos-Predict2 14B Video2World | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 68.2 h | Very slow | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| SkyReels V2 T2V 14B 540P | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.7 h | Very slow | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| FramePack I2V (HunyuanVideo 13B) | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.1 h | Very slow | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Wan 2.1 I2V 14B 480P | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 49.0 h | Very slow | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| LTX-Video 13B 0.9.8 (distilled) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.6 h | Very slow | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Kandinsky 6.0 Video Lite (3B, video + audio) | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.7 h | Very slow | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Mochi 1 Preview (10B) | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 52.1 h | Very slow | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| CogVideoX 1.5 5B | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.4 h | Very slow | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Wan-Dancer 14B (music to dance) | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 196.9 h | Very slowtight fit · encoder unloaded after use | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Cosmos-Predict2 2B Video2World | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.8 h | Very slow | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Cosmos 1.0 Diffusion 7B Text2World | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.1 h | Very slowtight fit | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Allegro (2.8B) | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 56.8 h | Very slow | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Kandinsky 6.0 Pro (29B, video + audio) | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 181.0 h | Very slowCPU offload | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| CogVideoX 5B I2V | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.5 h | Very slow | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| CogVideoX 5B | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.5 h | Very slow | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Wan 2.1 VACE 1.3B | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.3 h | Very slow | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| SkyReels V2 Diffusion Forcing 1.3B | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.2 h | Very slow | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Wan 2.1 T2V 1.3B | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.4 h | Very slow | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| LTX-Video 2B | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 71.0 min | Very slow | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.0 min | Runs wellCPU offload |
| CogVideoX 2B | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.8 h | Very slow | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.9 min | Runs wellCPU offload |
| AnimateDiff v3 (SD 1.5) | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 46/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 56.8 min | Very slow | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 min | Runs great |
| Cosmos3-Super Image2Video (64B) | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
Decision models
69 of 70 decision models run on the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1500B NAS (64 GB). 54.4 GB usable for models.
63 of 70 decision models run on the Intel Arc A380. 6.0 GB usable for models.
| Model | QualityRyzen Embedded V1500B NAS | SpeedRyzen Embedded V1500B NAS | RunsRyzen Embedded V1500B NAS | QualityArc A380 | SpeedArc A380 | RunsArc A380 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenAI Privacy Filter | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 159 ms | Runs well | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.5 ms | Runs great |
| Qwen3 Reranker 4B | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 23.3 s | Very slow | 89Excellent quality (A+) · 89 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 494 ms | Slow |
| Jina Reranker v3.5 | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 s | Very slow | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 87 ms | Runs great |
| Qwen3 Reranker 8B | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 47.4 s | Very slow | 89Excellent quality (A+) · 89 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.3 s | Slowoffloads to RAM |
| Skywork Reward V2 Llama 3.1 8B | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 92.8 s | Very slow | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| zerank-2 | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 23.3 s | Very slow | 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 494 ms | Slow |
| Jina Reranker v3 | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 s | Very slow | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 92/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 87 ms | Runs great |
| GLiNER2.5 Decide | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.5 s | Very slow | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39 ms | Runs great |
| Shieldstral 1.0 3B | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 22.3 s | Very slow | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 473 ms | Slow |
| GLiDE 27B | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 80.7 s | Very slow | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Intern-Decision 4B | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.4 s | Very slow | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 299 ms | Runs well |
| FRIDA-Decisions | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.5 s | Very slow | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 62 ms | Runs great |
| Qwen3 Reranker 0.6B | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 s | Very slow | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 87 ms | Runs great |
| mxbai-rerank-large v2 | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.9 s | Very slow | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 196 ms | Runs well |
| d1 3B | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 9.2 s | Very slow | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 216 ms | Runs well |
| Skywork Reward V2 Qwen3 8B | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 93.6 s | Very slow | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Llama Prompt Guard 2 86M | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.7 s | Very slow | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44 ms | Runs great |
| Llama Prompt Guard 2 22M | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 443 ms | Slow | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14 ms | Runs great |
| GLiClass ModernBERT Large v3 | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.2 s | Slow | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32 ms | Runs great |
| zerank-1 small | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.0 s | Very slow | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 219 ms | Runs well |
| LemonDecider 4B | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.0 s | Very slow | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| mxbai-rerank-base v2 | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.8 s | Very slow | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 72 ms | Runs great |
| DeBERTa v3 Large Zero-shot v2.0 | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.4 s | Very slow | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35 ms | Runs great |
| GTE Reranker ModernBERT Base | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 932 ms | Slow | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 25 ms | Runs great |
| Qwen3Guard Gen 8B | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 51.5 s | Very slow | 81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.3 s | Slowoffloads to RAM |
| BGE Reranker v2 Gemma | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.5 s | Very slow | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 317 ms | Runs well |
| GLiClass Base v3 | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 591 ms | Slow | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17 ms | Runs great |
| ms-marco MiniLM L6 v2 | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 146 ms | Runs well | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.3 ms | Runs great |
| ModernBERT Large Zero-shot v2.0 | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.2 s | Slow | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32 ms | Runs great |
| Qwen3Guard Gen 4B | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 27.7 s | Very slow | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 723 ms | Slow |
| Granite Embedding Reranker English R2 | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 932 ms | Slow | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 25 ms | Runs great |
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron Safety Guard 8B v3 | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 50.5 s | Very slow | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.2 s | Slowoffloads to RAM |
| Granite Guardian 4.1 8B | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 52.7 s | Very slow | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.3 s | Slowoffloads to RAM |
| DeBERTa v3 Base Zero-shot v2.0 | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 561 ms | Slow | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17 ms | Runs great |
| DuoGuard 0.5B | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 s | Very slow | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 74 ms | Runs great |
| Jina Reranker v2 Base Multilingual | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.7 s | Very slow | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44 ms | Runs great |
| BGE Reranker v2 M3 | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 s | Very slow | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 85 ms | Runs great |
| GLiGuard 300M | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.3 s | Slow | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34 ms | Runs great |
| Laya | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.3 s | Slow | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34 ms | Runs great |
| GLiNER2 Base v1 | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 653 ms | Slow | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19 ms | Runs great |
| ProtectAI DeBERTa v3 Prompt Injection v2 | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.1 s | Slow | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30 ms | Runs great |
| Skywork Reward V2 Qwen3 0.6B | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.4 s | Very slow | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 152 ms | Runs well |
| WildGuard 7B | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.6 s | Very slow | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.1 s | Slowtight fit |
| Granite Guardian 3.3 8B | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 51.4 s | Very slow | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.3 s | Slowoffloads to RAM |
| NuExtract 2.0 4B | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.7 s | Very slow | 75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 961 ms | Slow |
| CompassJudger-2 32B | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 864.2 s | Very slow | 81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Qwen3Guard Gen 0.6B | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.7 s | Very slow | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 126 ms | Runs great |
| HHEM 2.1 Open | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.4 s | Very slow | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35 ms | Runs great |
| Laya Multilingual | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 993 ms | Slow | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 27 ms | Runs great |
| DynaGuard 8B | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 177.7 s | Very slow | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.5 s | Very slowoffloads to RAM |
| GLiNER Multi v2.1 | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 901 ms | Slow | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 25 ms | Runs great |
| NuExtract 2.0 2B | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.6 s | Very slow | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 568 ms | Slow |
| Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 93.3 s | Very slow | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.2 s | Very slow |
| Selene 1 Mini 8B | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 211.8 s | Very slow | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.2 s | Very slowoffloads to RAM |
| ShieldGemma 27B | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 157.5 s | Very slow | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.7 s | Very slowheavy RAM offload |
| gpt-oss-safeguard 20B | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.4 s | Very slow | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.4 s | Very slowheavy RAM offload |
| LettuceDetect Large | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.0 s | Very slow | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 103 ms | Runs great |
| ShieldGemma 9B | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53.5 s | Very slow | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.3 s | Slowoffloads to RAM |
| CompassJudger-2 7B | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 201.0 s | Very slow | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.3 s | Very slowtight fit |
| BART Large MNLI | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.3 s | Slow | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33 ms | Runs great |
| Llama Guard 3 8B | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 50.5 s | Very slow | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.2 s | Slowoffloads to RAM |
| ShieldGemma 2B | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.1 s | Very slow | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 330 ms | Runs well |
| Llama Guard 4 12B | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 75.5 s | Very slow | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 s | Very slowheavy RAM offload |
| Prometheus 2 8x7B | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 289.3 s | Very slow | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DynaGuard 1.7B | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.0 s | Very slow | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.9 s | Very slow |
| Prometheus 2 7B | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 191.0 s | Very slow | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.9 s | Very slowtight fit |
| GLIDER | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 100.8 s | Very slow | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.6 s | Very slow |
| Llama Guard 3 1B | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 9.4 s | Very slow | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 249 ms | Runs well |
| Flow Judge v0.1 | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 100.8 s | Very slow | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.6 s | Very slow |
| gpt-oss-safeguard 120B | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.