QNAP TBS-h574TX

Products · · NAS

QNAP TBS-h574TX

Chips
Intel Core i5-1240P / i5-1340P or Intel Core i5-1235U / i7-1255U
Memory (RAM)
12 or 16 GB
Released
2023

Product page (opens in a new tab) Full AI report

Configurations

Pick one to see which models it runs. More memory lets larger models fit; bandwidth sets how fast they answer.

Configuration Memory Usable for AI Bandwidth LLMs that run well Launch price
Intel Core i5-1240P / i5-1340P · Intel Core i5-1240P / i5-1340P 12.0 GB 8.4 GB 38 GB/s 205 of 622 —
Intel Core i5-1235U / i7-1255U · Intel Core i5-1235U / i7-1255U 16.0 GB 12.0 GB 38 GB/s 214 of 622 —
Intel Core i5-1240P / i5-1340P · Intel Core i5-1240P / i5-1340P 16.0 GB 12.0 GB 38 GB/s 214 of 622 —

Specifications 12.0 GB configuration

MakerQNAP
TypeNAS
ProcessorIntel Core i5-1240P / i5-1340P NAS (12 GB) · Intel Core i5-1240P / i5-1340P
Memory (RAM)12.0 GB
Usable for AI models8.4 GB
Memory bandwidth38 GB/s
FP16 compute0.5 TFLOPS
Runs models onCPU cores
Drive bays5 x E1.S up to 15 mm (PCIe Gen3 x2 each); each bay ships with an adapter that takes one M.2 2280 NVMe SSD…
NAS systemQuTS hero
Containers (Docker)Yes
Virtual machinesYes
Memory upgradesoldered (non-expandable) · up to 16.0 GB per the maker
NotesIntel Core i5-1235U, 10C (2P+8E)/12T, 4.4GHz. Only 10 cores; up to 16 GB RAM. CPU-only inference of small models via Docker.
Product pagewww.qnap.com (opens in a new tab)

Running AI on the QNAP TBS-h574TX

It can, with limits: expect small models only, at modest speed. Models run on its CPU cores, and this configuration leaves about 8.4 GB for them after the NAS system and its storage services. The grades below assume the NAS isn’t busy with backups or media work at the same time. More memory is the upgrade that matters most: see the configurations.

Apps you can install to run models

AppHow it installs
Ollama + Open WebUI In a container (Docker)
Ollama / Open WebUI or any other LLM server image In a container (Docker)
Any Linux VM running an LLM runtime In a virtual machine

Apps that run LLMs on a NAS, with their container images

AI features from QNAP

FeatureWhat it doesWhere the AI runs
Qsirch RAG Search (cloud LLM mode) Natural-language search and Q&A over NAS files; retrieval runs on the NAS but the LLM is a cloud API (Gemini, OpenAI, Azure OpenAI or OpenAI-compatible). Cloud service or another computer

Best LLMs for the QNAP TBS-h574TX 12.0 GB

Quality Model Quant Memory Speed Runs
57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Ling 3.0 Tiny (8B-A1.3B)Ant Group (inclusionAI) Q4_K_M 6.3 GB 31.5 tok/s Runs great
76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. K2 Horizon 7BInstitute of Foundation Models Q4_K_M 8.0 GB 5.1 tok/s Slowtight fit
75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. MiMo V2.6 Distill Qwen 9BXiaomi Q5_K_M 8.2 GB 4.0 tok/s Slowtight fit
74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. SenseNova Loop 9B PreviewSenseTime Q4_K_M 7.6 GB 4.7 tok/s Slowtight fit
66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4BNVIDIA Q4_K_M 6.3 GB 10.2 tok/s Runs well
74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Ornith 1.5 9BDeepReinforce Q5_K_M 8.4 GB 3.9 tok/s Slowtight fit
70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. TMax 9BAi2 Q4_K_M 7.0 GB 5.1 tok/s Slow
73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3.5 9BAlibaba Q5_K_M 8.4 GB 3.9 tok/s Slowtight fit
64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Gemma 4 E4BGoogle Q4_K_M 6.3 GB 10.2 tok/s Runs well
58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Mellum2.1 Thinking (12B-A2.5B)JetBrains Q3_K_M 7.3 GB 22.0 tok/s Runs welltight fit

Best Image models for the QNAP TBS-h574TX 12.0 GB

Quality Model Quant Memory Speed Runs
89Excellent quality (A+) · 89 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. FLUX 3 Image KleinBlack Forest Labs FP8 7.9 GB 8.1 min Very slowtight fit · encoder unloaded after use
76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. FLUX.2 [klein] 4BBlack Forest Labs FP8 6.2 GB 85 s Slowencoder unloaded after use
78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Z-Image TurboAlibaba (Tongyi) Q4 GGUF 6.1 GB 4.7 min Very slowencoder unloaded after use
78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. FLUX.2 [klein] 9BBlack Forest Labs Q4 GGUF 8.0 GB 3.4 min Very slowtight fit · encoder unloaded after use
79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. ERNIE-Image TurboBaidu Q4 GGUF 7.4 GB 6.0 min Very slowtight fit · encoder unloaded after use
81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. ERNIE-ImageBaidu Q4 GGUF 7.4 GB 41.5 min Very slowtight fit · encoder unloaded after use

Best Video models for the QNAP TBS-h574TX 12.0 GB

Quality Model Quant Memory Speed Runs
49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. LTX-Video 2BLightricks FP8 6.1 GB 35.3 min Slowencoder unloaded after use
74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. HY-OmniWeaving (8.3B, unified video)Tencent FP8 7.8 GB 15.5 h Very slowtight fit · CPU offload
53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Wan 2.1 T2V 1.3BAlibaba FP8 7.1 GB 5.7 h Very slowtight fit · encoder unloaded after use
53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Wan 2.1 VACE 1.3BAlibaba FP8 8.0 GB 6.1 h Very slowtight fit · encoder unloaded after use
35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. AnimateDiff v3 (SD 1.5)Shanghai AI Lab FP16 4.7 GB 29.9 min Slow

Best Decision models for the QNAP TBS-h574TX 12.0 GB

Quality Model Quant Memory Speed Runs
78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. OpenAI Privacy FilterOpenAI F16 3.8 GB 55 ms Runs great
68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Llama Prompt Guard 2 22MMeta Q8_0 0.7 GB 129 ms Runs great
86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Jina Reranker v3.5Jina AI Q8_0 2.1 GB 1.0 s Slow
80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GLiNER2.5 DecideFastino Q8_0 1.2 GB 437 ms Slow
84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Jina Reranker v3Jina AI Q8_0 2.1 GB 1.0 s Slow
90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3 Reranker 4BAlibaba Q8_0 5.8 GB 6.7 s Very slow
80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. FRIDA-DecisionsSber AI Q8_0 1.7 GB 728 ms Slow
88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. zerank-2ZeroEntropy Q8_0 5.8 GB 6.7 s Very slow

Spec sources

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.

Was this page helpful?